On March 8th, 2019, we prepared a list of the more than 100 times that Obama’s Deep State FBI took actions that deviated from standard practice and/or were corrupt and/or were criminal in their efforts to exonerate Hillary from her crimes and then spy on and frame candidate and then President Trump.  After the Mueller train wreck this past week we thought we’d provide an updated list of these unbelievable actions.
 

By Joe Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

As we noted in March, current and former FBI associates were embarrassed to even turn on their TV’s before the Mueller testimony.  Now they must be enraged.

Time magazine of all places reported about the many efforts the FBI took related to Hillary’s exoneration and then the framing of President Trump.  These corrupt and criminal actions have taken a desperate toll on the current members of the FBI –

In normal times, the televisions are humming at the FBI’s 56 field offices nationwide, piping in the latest news as agents work their investigations. But these days, some agents say, the TVs are often off to avoid the crush of bad stories about the FBI itself. The bureau, which is used to making headlines for nabbing crooks, has been grabbing the spotlight for unwanted reasons: fired leaders, texts between lovers and, most of all, attacks by President Trump. “I don’t care what channel it’s on,” says Tom O’Connor, a veteran investigator in Washington who leads the FBI Agents Association. “All you hear is negative stuff about the FBI … It gets depressing.”

Of course the employees of the FBI are in a funk, their fearless and corrupt leaders, as well as leaders in Obama’s corrupt DOJ, participated in extravagant efforts to exonerate the obvious criminal actions of Hillary Clinton, and then to do all they could to prevent candidate Trump from winning an election.  Then once the election was won by President Trump, they went to unheard of depths of deceit and corruption to attempt to remove him from office.

Here’s our list from March of more than 100 actions the Deep State FBI and DOJ took that were either outside of policy and/or were corrupt and/or were criminal surrounding the 2016 Presidential election and exoneration of Hillary Clinton and the setup/attempts to remove Donald Trump from office.

Former Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy called for the September 2016 Papadopoulos/Halper transcript to be released.

The former Congressman explained that “there is exculpatory evidence in the transcript and the FBI hid the information from the FISA court. Gowdy also told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo that there are more transcripts. George Papadopoulos told Bartiromo that the transcript of his conversation with Halper will prove he didn’t take the bait when Halper brought up Hillary’s ‘hacked emails,’” according to the Gateway Pundit.

Papadopoulos allegedly told Halper that it was treason if he were to accept help from Russia, Bartiromo stated.

“That’s CRAZY! Are you kidding me? That’s treason! People get hanged for stuff like that! I would never do something like that,” Papadopoulos allegedly stated when speaking to Halper during the September 2016 meeting, which took place in London.

“What you just described is textbook exculpatory information. It tends to show that a person did not commit a crime,” Gowdy stated.

It is important to think back to September of 2016, when Stephan Halper connected with Papadopoulos out of the blue via email, offering him “$3,000 dollars and a trip to London under the guise of needing his expertise on energy dealings,” according to TGP. “This was after Halper met with Trump’s other campaign advisor Carter Page in July of 2016,” the outlet explains.

Take a look at the Fox News report below:
 

Intro: Victoria Toensing and Joe diGenova take aim at Robert Mueller over his testimony on Capitol Hill.

Rep. Nunes calls Mueller hearing ‘spectacle” and ‘political theater’

POWERFUL: GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe Essentially Gets Robert Mueller to Admit He Ignored Bedrock American Principle of ‘Presumption of Innocence’ in Order to Frame President Trump: ‘Volume II of This Report was Not Authorized Under the Law’.

Rep. John Ratcliffe’s full questioning of Robert Mueller

Rep. Steve Chabot’s full questioning of Robert Mueller. 
BOMBSHELL: Mueller claims he knows nothing about Fusion GPS?!

Rep. John Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor brings the heat and shows everyone watching what a disgrace this whole “investigation” was.

Rep. John Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor brings the heat and shows everyone watching what a disgrace this whole “investigation” was.

Worth the watch. pic.twitter.com/Rcjrish9mR

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) July 24, 2019

The Epoch Times

Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.

But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.

Read more:

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said he is “confident” that when Attorney General Bill Barr concludes his investigation of the origins of the investigation of President Trump’s 2016 campaign, the American people will learn that the FBI and CIA under the Obama administration engaged in foul play.

President Trump and his supporters have questioned how the investigation started in the first place, accusing the FBI of carrying it out under false pretenses. King is among those leveling such allegations.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said he is “confident” that when Attorney General Bill Barr concludes his investigation of the origins of the investigation of President Trump’s 2016 campaign, the American people will learn that the FBI and CIA under the Obama administration engaged in foul play.

President Trump and his supporters have questioned how the investigation started in the first place, accusing the FBI of carrying it out under false pretenses. King is among those leveling such allegations.

But it is not just the FBI that King believes engaged in underhanded tactics. He believes U.S. intelligence was involved as well.

“Just from evidence I’ve seen over the last several years being on the Intelligence Committee, being a member of Congress, there’s no doubt to me there were severe serious abuses that were carried out in the FBI, and I believe the top levels of the CIA,” he said.

A recent RealClearInvestigations report of Mueller's findings pointed to various inconsistencies, as well as the influence of former CIA Director John Brennan, an outspoken critic of President Trump. That report also noted that Mueller's team did not personally investigate the hacking of Democratic National Committee emails, but used a DNC contractor to determine that Russia was behind it.

King is no longer on the House Intelligence Committee, but current members will have an opportunity to ask Mueller about this when he testifies before the committee on July 17.

Mueller was subpoenaed by Democrats, who have discussed impeaching Trump over evidence in Mueller’s report they believe support a case for obstruction of justice. Republicans, meanwhile, are looking forward to asking Mueller about the origins of the investigation, as well as exactly when Mueller determined that the evidence did not support claims that Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia.

Robert Mueller faces grilling on Capitol Hill; reaction from Fox News contributor Sara Carter, 'The Russia Hoax' author Gregg Jarrett and Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz.

by Cristina Laila
GatewayPundit.com

The State Department in a letter to the Chairman of the very powerful Finance Committee, Senator Grassley (R-IA) confirmed Hillary Clinton’s classified material violations.

The State Department stated that it has assessed culpability to 15 (unnamed) individuals, some of whom were culpable in MULTIPLE security incidents related to Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server and her mishandling of classified information.

“Consistent with longstanding policy, the Department does not release the names of current or former employees participating in the security incident program. However, in the spirit of cooperation, the Department can share with you certain information about the status of the ongoing review. To this point, the Department has assessed culpability to 15 individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents. DS has issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents under 12 FAM 550. This number will likely change as the review progresses,” Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Legislative Affairs Mary Elizabeth Taylor wrote.

Individuals still employed by the State Department will be referred to the Bureau of Human Resources and some may receive disciplinary action…that’s it?

Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) talks with Judicial Watch about how Mueller hired people who he knew hated President Trump. He said, "We’ve never had a special counsel that hired people that hated the subject of an investigation. You had Strozk and Page and he didn't fire them when he found out about their bias against President Trump. He only fired them when their texts came out. Mueller hired people who he knew hated the president. From day one, it was clear that this was not a guy on a mission for justice. It was a guy on a mission for revenge."

TheConservativeTreehouse.com

The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.

Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server.  Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.

The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked.  In a court filing (full pdf below) the scale of sketchy has increased exponentially.

Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack.  When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission.  Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.