Netanyahu’s reasoning for his latest land grab lays bare the stark hypocrisy of his Western supporters.
 

Infowars.com

This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that following the fall of Bashar Assad, the 1974 separation of forces agreement between his country and Damascus is “no longer valid.” This deal, brokered by the United Nations, prohibited military deployments in the buffer zone of the Golan Heights, a region legally recognized as Syrian territory but occupied by the Jewish state since 1967.

Netanyahu’s reasoning? Since Syria’s internationally recognized government no longer exists after Assad’s departure, he no longer considers prior treaties with Damascus binding. According to this interpretation, Israel is justified in bombing Syrian airfields, seizing ports, and even expanding its territorial occupation – all under the guise of ensuring its national security.

The US State Department immediately endorsed this position, calling West Jerusalem’s actions a “necessary security measure” in a volatile region. Washington, ever eager to back its Middle Eastern ally, showed no hesitation in adapting its “rules-based order” to fit its strategic goals.

This explains quite a bit, doesn't it? When someone tries to tell you all cultures are equally valid . . . well, this pretty much blows that stupid notion out of the water.

: 10 minutes or less.  : 11- 36 minutes.   : Over 36 min. Fun:

FEATURED VIDEO

•   Israel’s Occupation of Syria is ‘Security,’ Russia’s Moves in Ukraine are ‘Aggression’
  This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that following the fall of Bashar Assad, the 1974 separation of forces agreement between his country and Damascus is “no longer valid.” This deal, brokered by the United Nations, prohibited military deployments in the buffer zone of the Golan Heights, a region legally recognized as Syrian territory but occupied by the Jewish state since 1967.  Netanyahu’s reasoning? Since Syria’s internationally recognized government no longer exists after Assad’s departure, he no longer considers prior treaties with Damascus binding. According to this interpretation, Israel is justified in bombing Syrian airfields, seizing ports, and even expanding its territorial occupation – all under the guise of ensuring its national security.
•   Nick Fuentes on Israeli False Flags and the 2024 Election
  Political commentator Nick Fuentes joined Alex Jones to discuss the escalating geopolitical tensions between Iran and Israel and the possibility of more false flag events in the region leading up to the 2024 election
•   US Spends Fortune on Border Walls in Middle East
  The Democrats controlling Congress continue to fight tooth and nail to prevent the construction of border wall to defend the USA from the ongoing foreign invasion that has been wreaking havoc on our streets and rendering us vulnerable to foreign terrorists and drug cartels. Meanwhile, it shovels our money at Middle Eastern countries specifically to enhance their border defenses.
•   Seven Countries in Five Years ”: The 2001 Regime’s War Plan Resurfaces in 2023?
  This recent deep dive into 2001, spotlighted by Joe Rogan, reveals chilling revelations from General Wesley Clark. Clark claims that the U.S. had ambitions to topple seven countries in just five years. Rogan also examines the potent wartime propaganda used to convince citizens that airstrikes and warfare are the only viable solutions.
•   Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land
  Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East, zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This pivotal documentary exposes how the foreign policy interests of American political elites--oil, and a need to have a secure military base in the region, among others--work in combination with Israeli public relations strategies to exercise a powerful influence over how news from the region is reported.
•   The Chain Of Lies That Lead To The War In The Middle East
  This short video documents the chain of lies, one morphing into the next in a perfectly orchestrated and timed sequence that ensured by the time the new lie was delivered, the previous ones has already been forgotten.  This is what corrupt, lying, manipulative people do to achieve goals that they know nobody would support if they were actually told the truth about what was happening.
•   Helen Thomas on Her Resignation and the Middle East
  This interview was back in 2010 and represents one of the more disturbing examples of what happens to you if you criticize Israel in any way shape or form.   And it shows that NOBODY is immune, not even a veteran reporter like Helen Thomas.  Former White House correspondent Helen Thomas acknowledges she touched a nerve with remarks about Israel that led to her retirement. But she says the comments were "exactly what I thought," even though she realized soon afterward that it was the end of her job.
   

Editor's Note:  What's wrong with this picture?  Sure looks like totally destroying Gaza and genociding the inhabitants amounts to nothing but another controlled demolition land grab by the Zionists.  This has been the goal beginning in 1948.

Infowars.com

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday released a utopian plan for a rebuilt Gaza called “Gaza 2035.”

The Prime Minister’s Office published a 9-page PowerPoint file describing a future where Gaza is de-radicalized from Islamism, transformed into a trade hub of prosperity and innovation and integrated into the Middle East’s economy.

The Balfour Declaration was signed in 1917. It set out British support for the creation of a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. But when the Balfour declaration was signed the British had already promised Palestine to Arabs as an independent state and promised the French government that it would be an internationally administered zone – and even then, most of the land was still under Ottoman control. So why did Britain make these three conflicting promises? How did it try to resolve them? And how did Britain’s strategy in the Middle East help to cause a century of conflict?

PART I

__

1936, British Mandatory Palestine was in flames. In response to rising Jewish immigration and economic dominance, Arab Palestinians revolted against the British attacking military installations and Jewish settlements. The British were scrambling for an answer. In our last episode, we explored Britain’s conflicting promises made during the First World War and how it tried to resolve them. In this episode we’ll examine how the Second World War transformed the conflict in Mandate Palestine once again. Why did Britain change its mind about a Jewish homeland, how did a Zionist underground insurgency defeat the British and how were the borders of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank created?

PART II

The Democrats controlling Congress continue to fight tooth and nail to prevent the construction of border wall to defend the USA from the ongoing foreign invasion that has been wreaking havoc on our streets and rendering us vulnerable to foreign terrorists and drug cartels. Meanwhile, it shovels our money at Middle Eastern countries specifically to enhance their border defenses.

One America News reports:

Revolver.news

We’re beginning to really uncover the past dirty deeds of our corrupt government, and the revelations are truly alarming. Let’s rewind to 2001, when the United States was attacked by Osama bin Laden. Now, we know our government lied to us about “weapons of mass destruction,” but it seems they had an even grander and more deadly scheme in mind, which prominently featured Iran—a nation, alongside Russia, they’ve been itching to attack. Interestingly, the echoes of the past resonate a tad too closely with our present in 2023, as talk of a potential war with Russia and Iran resurfaces once again. Round and round our war machine goes, right?

This recent deep dive into 2001, spotlighted by Joe Rogan, reveals chilling revelations from General Wesley Clark. Clark claims that the U.S. had ambitions to topple seven countries in just five years. Rogan also examines the potent wartime propaganda used to convince citizens that airstrikes and warfare are the only viable solutions.

Here’s what popular X user KanekoaTheGreat said in his post:

This interview was back in 2010 and represents one of the more disturbing examples of what happens to you if you criticize Israel in any way shape or form.   And it shows that NOBODY is immune, not even a veteran reporter like Helen Thomas.

Former White House correspondent Helen Thomas acknowledges she touched a nerve with remarks about Israel that led to her retirement. But she says the comments were "exactly what I thought," even though she realized soon afterward that it was the end of her job.

Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East, zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This pivotal documentary exposes how the foreign policy interests of American political elites--oil, and a need to have a secure military base in the region, among others--work in combination with Israeli public relations strategies to exercise a powerful influence over how news from the region is reported.