Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 505

Stats
1281 Pages Viewed
433 Unique Visits

New Users
submarelime76
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • WHO (World Health Organization)

WHO Changes CCP Virus Test Criteria in Attempt to Reduce False Positives


Editor's Note:  Funny, once they stole the election from Trump, suddenly things like this are happening all over the place.  The WHO had DELIBERATELY instructed everyone to use very high cycles on PCR test in order to produce mostly false-positive results, to create the perception of an out-of-control pandemic.   They know damned well they have been LYING to us all from the very start!  The PCR test is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TEST!  It is a process developed to manufactures samples for clinical research.  It CANNOT detect viral infections.  They have been improperly using the PCR process to control the perception that a pandemic is occurring and then used to manufacture the perception that their dangerous vaccines are being successful.   Increase the cycles used, you create "more cases."  Decrease the cycles and you create the perception of "fewer cases" which makes everyone think it's because of the wonderful vaccines.  THEY ALL KNOW ANYTHING OVER 35 CYCLES WILL CREATE MOSTLY FALSE POSITIVES, which is why they have been instructing to use 40 cycles or more!  Fauci admitted this recently.  Watch the video here.

By Meiling Lee
TheEpochTimes.com

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned experts not to rely solely on the results of a PCR test to detect the CCP virus.

In updated guidance published on Jan. 20, the WHO said that lab experts and health care practitioners should also consider the patient’s history and epidemiological risk factors alongside the PCR test in diagnosing the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

The new guidance could result in significantly fewer daily cases.

“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information,” the guidance says.

It’s unclear why the health agency waited over a year to release the new directive. The WHO didn’t reply to an inquiry from The Epoch Times.

Scientists and physicians have raised concerns for many months of an over-reliance on and a misuse of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool since it can’t differentiate between a live infectious virus from an inactivated virus fragment that is not infectious.

Additionally, the high cycle threshold values of most PCR tests—at 40 cycles or higher—increases the risk of false positives. A higher threshold value indicates less viral load and that the person is less likely to be infectious, while a person with a lower cycle threshold value has a higher viral load, or is more infectious.

The WHO did not specify what the threshold value cutoff should be for a positive diagnosis, but said to only “determine if [a] manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

W.H.O. Acknowledges Chi-Com Virus Tests are Highly Flawed


TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT:
C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

By Michael Thau
RedState.com

Well, what are the odds?

It just so happens that—on the very day Joe Biden took office—the World Health Organization also released new guidelines ratcheting up the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19.

A single positive PCR test for the virus isn’t going to cut it anymore.

For some reason, as of today, the organization decided that those tests for the virus we’ve been relentlessly assured are the gold standard for detecting infection are, in reality, just a mere “aid for diagnosis.”

Clinicians now, not only can, but “must” also consider a wide array of other factors, like “timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts,” and even something called “epidemiological information”—whatever that exactly is—before diagnosing anyone with COVID-19.

WHO has also suddenly decided that, if you don’t show any symptoms, you’ll need to get a second test for confirmation as well.

 

That’s a whole heck of a lot of extra hoops a person has to jump through to make the list of those officially infected or killed by COVID-19.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Ten Times The World Health Organization Erred: Why Is WHO Still Credible & Not Disbanded?


By Susan Hamner
TheWashingtonStandard.com

When medical professionals deal with the health of the public, the information relied upon has to be accurate, meet the standards of the scientific method, and meet the gold standard of the medical profession. Those on the frontlines have relied on various agencies and associations to obtain their information, such as the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institute of Health (NIH), the American Medical Association (AMA), and a host of others. But, what happens when one of these sources becomes unreliable, committing serious errors that jeopardize the health and well-being of the public? The public gets half-hearted apologies.

GreatGameIndia.org documents ten times the World Health Organization (WHO) has errored bringing into question the legitimacy of the United Nations’ health organization to be a source for medical professionals around the world.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a primary agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. However, in recent times, the WHO has been criticized for either acting too late or too little during a health crisis. There have been instances where WHO was caught grossly unprepared with its course of action. Other times, the scientists and researchers at WHO have made laughable errors while preparing reports. This begs the question: Why WHO makes so many mistakes? Is it deliberate? Or is there some other reason behind WHO’s never ending list of errors?

Working backwards, beginning with the CON-VID-19 scam-demic, here are WHO’s top ten blunders.
 

WHO Blunders in Coronavirus Risk Assessment”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Who’s Who At The W.H.O?

The health agency plays a critical role in the globalists’ development of the New World Order system


This report examines the history of the leadership of the World Health Organization, and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.

 

 
 
 

 

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

W.H.O. Skips Wuhan During China Trip; “Sat in Beijing For Three Weeks”

“Any chance of finding a smoking gun is now gone”


ZeroHedge.com

A delegation from the World Health Organization tasked with investigating the origins of COVID-19 failed to go to Wuhan, China – ‘ground zero’ for the pandemic, and instead “sat in Beijing for three weeks” according to a senior US official, who told the Financial Times that Western governments are skeptical over China’s commitment to identifying the origins of the pandemic.

“Any chance of finding a smoking gun is now gone,” the official continued. Though we’re not sure what any team of investigators would find after China blocked international epidemiologists for eight months after the outbreak began.

Australian MP Dave Sharma told the Times: “The international community is right to have serious concerns about the rigour and independence of the WHO’s early response to this pandemic, and its seeming wish to avoid offending China.

“If this allegation is proven, it is another disturbing incident of the WHO — which is charged with safeguarding global public health — putting the political sensitivities of a member state above the public health interests of the world, in the critical early stages of this pandemic. We are all now bearing the immense costs of such a policy.”

The WHO, meanwhile, says that the three-week visit was ‘merely laying the groundwork in advance of a full international mission,’ but gave no indication when this might happen.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Corbett Report - The WHO Publishes A Guide On How To Deal With Vocal Vaccine Deniers


Editor's Note:  The WHO is a globalist controlled organization that IS NOT CONCERNED WITH GLOBAL HEALTH!  It is an organization that was formed by the globalist to push/impose their medical tyranny onto all of humanity.  They are vaccine pushers!  This is just the latest example of this fact. 

 

The WHO (World Health Organization) has made a handy-dandy guide on how to debate vaccine deniers. Today on #PropagandaWatch, James delves into the document and examines its ideas.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

FREE Video Library: WHO (World Health Organization)


: 10 minutes or less.  : 11- 36 minutes.   : Over 36 min. Fun:

 

  •   Who’s Who At The W.H.O?
    This report examines the history of the leadership of the World Health Organization, and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.
  •   What is the WHO (World Health Organization)?
    James Corbett clarifies the founding, the funding and the true intentions of the World Health Organization. Join James as he lays out some of the information connecting the WHO to big pharma, Bill Gates and the Covid World Order agenda.
  •   Corbett Report - The WHO Publishes A Guide On How To Deal With Vocal Vaccine Deniers
    The WHO (World Health Organization)is a globalist controlled organization that IS NOT CONCERNED WITH GLOBAL HEALTH!  It is an organization that was formed by the globalist to push/impose their medical tyranny onto all of humanity.  They are vaccine pushers!  This is just the latest example of this fact. The WHO has made a handy-dandy guide on how to debate vaccine deniers.  James delves into the document and examines its ideas.
  •   The WHO and the Vaccine Industry Are Total FRAUDS - And So Are The Alleged Pandemics They Orchestrate
    In the video, Reese discusses a 2010 Forbes article titled “Why The WHO Faked a Pandemic,” which breaks down how the World Health Organization in 2010 attempted to stage a fake Swine Flu outbreak, with scientists describing the “false pandemic” as “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”  The article explains how WHO was able to fake the pandemic by changing the definition to “eliminate severity as a factor.”

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Lethal Lockdowns: The WHO-CDC Global Genocide


 

By  William F. Jasper
TheNewAmerican.com

 

The COVID “cure” will prove to be far more deadly than the much-hyped, much-feared coronavirus.

“How do I kill thee? Let me count the ways.” Well, let’s see. Dr. Fauci’s dictatorial lockdowns were instituted (so we are told) to save lives from the dreaded COVID “pandemic.” But the lockdowns have very likely already taken more lives globally than the virus ever would have, as we will show below. And here’s the most important point: The COVID “cure” will keep on killing for many years to come. 

The full extent of COVID cure-related deaths is only beginning to be revealed, even as the CDC finally admits that its earlier death-rate estimates for the virus were way overblown. Yes, the wild estimates that were used by the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control, and the media to create panic and justify totalitarian edicts are now thoroughly discredited — while the far-greater death tolls from the lockdowns and the socio-economic havoc they are causing are only beginning to be tabulated. And the fatality numbers from the “cure” that are coming into view are horrific. As a result of the COVID lockdowns and mandates, many millions more people worldwide will die of famine, suicide, drug and alcohol abuse, cancer, heart failure, kidney failure, stroke, diabetes, tuberculosis, pneumonia, depression, loneliness, and other conditions.
 

Hundreds of Doctors Warn

On May 19, Simone Gold, M.D., and more than 500 physicians from across the country signed a letter to President Donald Trump urgently requesting that he end the national shutdown. Dr. Gold, an emergency medicine specialist in Los Angeles with 31 years of medical experience, and her distinguished list of co-signers sketch the very stark reality concerning the deadly impact of the shutdowns that they are already seeing in their medical practices.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

WHO: Healthy People Should Only Wear Masks When 'Taking Care of 'Sick People'


The World Health Organization is recommending healthy people, including those who don't exhibit COVID-19 symptoms, only wear masks when taking care of someone infected with the contagion, a sharp contrast from the advice given by American public health officials who recommend everyone wear a mask in public.

"If you do not have any respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough or runny nose, you do not need to wear a mask," Dr. April Baller, a public health specialist for the WHO, says in a video on the world health body's website posted in March. "Masks should only be used by health care workers, caretakers or by people who are sick with symptoms of fever and cough."

The recommendation has not changed and differs from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which urges individuals to wear a mask or face-covering in public settings, regardless of infection or not, to limit the spread of the virus.

"We now know from recent studies that a significant portion of individuals with coronavirus lack symptoms ('asymptomatic') and that even those who eventually develop symptoms ('pre-symptomatic') can transmit the virus to others before showing symptoms," the CDC mask guidance says. "In light of this new evidence, CDC recommends wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain."

Baller noted that masks can give people a "false feeling of protection" and noted that sick individuals should wear one to prevent transmitting the virus to others.

The news comes after the CDC recommended last month that people wear nonsurgical face coverings when out in public after previously advising only health care workers and people exhibiting symptoms to do so.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
Please Support Us With A Purchase








Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Worthy of Support












Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 505

Stats
1281 Pages Viewed
433 Unique Visits

New Users
submarelime76
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase