Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 365

Stats
3379 Pages Viewed
539 Unique Visits
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • WHO (World Health Organization)

Video: THE PLAN – WHO Plans for 10 Years of Manufactured Pandemics, from 2020 to 2030


THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans.

You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened.

For example, data from the World Integrated Trade Solution shows that in 2017 and 2018, hundreds of millions of COVID-19 Test Kits were distributed worldwide, long before the COVID-19 disease appeared in China, towards the end of 2019.

Let this sink in for a second: literally hundreds of millions of COVID-19 test kits were exported and imported, all over the world, during 2017 and 2018. Hundreds of millions! 

Make sure to watch, and share this everywhere.

 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty


Mercoloa.com

Story at-a-glance

  • The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more
  • The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission
  • More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment
  • The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, 2022, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations, May 22-28, 2022, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties.

The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place is now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order.

The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.

In “The Corbett Report”1,2 above, independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg - The Broad Issue of Corruption in the World Health Organization (WHO)


In this intimate sit down interview from the film "Planet Lockdown" with Wolfgang Wodarg, we discuss the broad issue of corruption in the WHO, how we should understand the "pandemic," or lack there of and how we must stop this diabolical trend towards a fake medical dystopia that will take over all aspects of our lives justified by a fake testing process. He is one of the most honest and thoughtful people we have ever met and has an amazing resume and has lived a rich life full of experiences that uniquely qualifies him to understand the depth and breadth of this complex situation we find ourselves in.

Wolfgang began his career as a doctor in internal medicine, was unhappy about the focus on making money off people who were sick so went on to be a public health official in northern Germany where he is from. There he made surveys to measure annual flu waves, by having his secretary calling factories, school and businesses to see if people were at home sick. It wasn't uncommon in a decent flu wave for 10% to be home sick. From there he became a member of the German Parliament. While there the Swine Flu scare occurred and he knew something wasn't right when 800 cases in Mexico was declared a pandemic. He dug into the issue and discovered a hornets nest of lies and corruption inside the WHO. He floored a bill called Fake Pandemic and did much to deflate that fake scare at the time, to the consternation of the corrupt functionaries of these institutions. He went on to work in the Counsel of Europe and is a truly one of the most honorable and honest voices to provide perspective on our current situation. We were honored to get one remote interview earlier in the year and this in person one. Listen and learn from this man of integrity!

 

 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

WHO Chief Scientist Served Legal Notice in India for Allegedly Suppressing Data on Drug to Treat COVID-19


By Meling Lee
TheEpochTimes.com

The Indian Bar Association has taken legal action against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan for her alleged role in spreading disinformation on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

The association served a legal notice (pdf) on Swaminathan on May 25, claiming that she was “spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfill her agenda” and sought to prevent her from “causing further damage.”

They further say that Swaminathan, in her statements against the use of ivermectin, ignored research and clinical trials from two organizations—the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD)—who have presented solid data showing ivermectin prevents and treats COVID-19.

“Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has ignored these studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin,” the plaintiff said in a statement (pdf).

In a May 10 tweet that has since been deleted after the notice was issued, Swaminathan wrote, “Safety and efficacy are important when using any drug for a new indication. WHO recommends against the use of ivermectin for COVID-19 except within clinical trials.”

Swaminathan made the Twitter post soon after Goa’s health minister announced that every Goa resident 18 and older would be given ivermectin as prevention regardless of their COVID-19 status, as part of the state government’s effort to stop the transmission of the virus. India has been hit hard in the second wave of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic beginning in March 2021.

The legal notice calls for a clear response from Swaminathan on a number of key points, and the association said that in the case of a failure to provide a clear response, it reserves the right to initiate prosecution under sections of the Indian Penal Code and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

The WHO’s chief scientist didn’t reply to a request for comment.

Continue Reading

Video: Trust WHO? Clandestine Influences Revealed


By Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • “TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, delves into the corruption behind the World Health Organization
  • Industry influences, from Big Tobacco to the nuclear industry and pharmaceuticals, dictated WHO’s global agenda from the start; WHO’s 2009 H1N1 pandemic response was heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry
  • WHO works closely with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a promotor of the nuclear industry, and has downplayed health effects caused by the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear disasters
  • WHO’s investigation into COVID-19’s origins is corrupt, as China was allowed to hand pick the members of the WHO’s investigative team, which includes Peter Daszak, Ph.D., who has close professional ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) that was being investigated
  • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was the biggest funder of WHO when Donald Trump stopped U.S. funding, making Gates’ priorities the backbone of WHO
    Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily influenced, if not outright controlled, by Bill Gates and industry, WHO’s usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be reevaluated.

     

 
 
 

The World Health Organization was created in 1948, founded by 61 member states and financed from their contributions. It appeared to be a promising start, intended to end human suffering and save lives but, according to Robert Parsons, a journalist based in Geneva, Switzerland, where the WHO headquarters are based, “it was infiltrated by industry from the very start.”

Parsons is just one expert interviewed in “TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck that delves into the corruption behind the preeminent organization that’s being trusted with public health. It started in the 1950s, a time when the scientific evidence on the harms of smoking was emerging, and has continued through nuclear disasters and at least two pandemics — swine flu in 2009 and COVID-19 in 2020.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

W.H.O. Adviser: ‘Actual Investigation’ in W.H.O. Wuhan COVID Probe ‘Done by Chinese Authorities’


By Selwyn Duke
TheNewAmerican.com

After first being panned as a conspiracy theory before gaining even some mainstream-media acceptance, the claim that the coronavirus originated in a Wuhan lab was recently “debunked” by a World Health Organization (WHO) investigation. That was the story, anyway. But a WHO advisor asserts that it’s a lie.

That man, Jamie Metzl, “said Tuesday night ‘the actual investigation was done by Chinese authorities’ and was ‘very short,’” reports WND.com.

“‘And so, the WHO investigators were basically receiving reports from the Chinese officials,’ he told the Fox News Channel’s Laura Ingraham” (video below).

 

Metzl “was an official in the National Security Agency and the State Department during the Clinton administration,” WND relates. “Along with his WHO advisory role, he is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.”

As for WHO’s “findings,” the head of its “mission, Peter Ben Embarek, said Tuesday it was ‘extremely unlikely’ that the virus leaked from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan,” WND also informs. “The team suspects the virus originated in animals before spreading to humans but doesn’t know how.”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

WHO Changes CCP Virus Test Criteria in Attempt to Reduce False Positives


Editor's Note:  Funny, once they stole the election from Trump, suddenly things like this are happening all over the place.  The WHO had DELIBERATELY instructed everyone to use very high cycles on PCR test in order to produce mostly false-positive results, to create the perception of an out-of-control pandemic.   They know damned well they have been LYING to us all from the very start!  The PCR test is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TEST!  It is a process developed to manufactures samples for clinical research.  It CANNOT detect viral infections.  They have been improperly using the PCR process to control the perception that a pandemic is occurring and then used to manufacture the perception that their dangerous vaccines are being successful.   Increase the cycles used, you create "more cases."  Decrease the cycles and you create the perception of "fewer cases" which makes everyone think it's because of the wonderful vaccines.  THEY ALL KNOW ANYTHING OVER 35 CYCLES WILL CREATE MOSTLY FALSE POSITIVES, which is why they have been instructing to use 40 cycles or more!  Fauci admitted this recently.  Watch the video here.

By Meiling Lee
TheEpochTimes.com

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned experts not to rely solely on the results of a PCR test to detect the CCP virus.

In updated guidance published on Jan. 20, the WHO said that lab experts and health care practitioners should also consider the patient’s history and epidemiological risk factors alongside the PCR test in diagnosing the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

The new guidance could result in significantly fewer daily cases.

“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information,” the guidance says.

It’s unclear why the health agency waited over a year to release the new directive. The WHO didn’t reply to an inquiry from The Epoch Times.

Scientists and physicians have raised concerns for many months of an over-reliance on and a misuse of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool since it can’t differentiate between a live infectious virus from an inactivated virus fragment that is not infectious.

Additionally, the high cycle threshold values of most PCR tests—at 40 cycles or higher—increases the risk of false positives. A higher threshold value indicates less viral load and that the person is less likely to be infectious, while a person with a lower cycle threshold value has a higher viral load, or is more infectious.

The WHO did not specify what the threshold value cutoff should be for a positive diagnosis, but said to only “determine if [a] manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

W.H.O. Acknowledges Chi-Com Virus Tests are Highly Flawed


TOTAL COINCIDENCE ALERT:
C19 Diagnostic Criteria Tightened by WHO on Biden Inauguration Day!

By Michael Thau
RedState.com

Well, what are the odds?

It just so happens that—on the very day Joe Biden took office—the World Health Organization also released new guidelines ratcheting up the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19.

A single positive PCR test for the virus isn’t going to cut it anymore.

For some reason, as of today, the organization decided that those tests for the virus we’ve been relentlessly assured are the gold standard for detecting infection are, in reality, just a mere “aid for diagnosis.”

Clinicians now, not only can, but “must” also consider a wide array of other factors, like “timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts,” and even something called “epidemiological information”—whatever that exactly is—before diagnosing anyone with COVID-19.

WHO has also suddenly decided that, if you don’t show any symptoms, you’ll need to get a second test for confirmation as well.

 

That’s a whole heck of a lot of extra hoops a person has to jump through to make the list of those officially infected or killed by COVID-19.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Ten Times The World Health Organization Erred: Why Is WHO Still Credible & Not Disbanded?


By Susan Hamner
TheWashingtonStandard.com

When medical professionals deal with the health of the public, the information relied upon has to be accurate, meet the standards of the scientific method, and meet the gold standard of the medical profession. Those on the frontlines have relied on various agencies and associations to obtain their information, such as the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institute of Health (NIH), the American Medical Association (AMA), and a host of others. But, what happens when one of these sources becomes unreliable, committing serious errors that jeopardize the health and well-being of the public? The public gets half-hearted apologies.

GreatGameIndia.org documents ten times the World Health Organization (WHO) has errored bringing into question the legitimacy of the United Nations’ health organization to be a source for medical professionals around the world.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a primary agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. However, in recent times, the WHO has been criticized for either acting too late or too little during a health crisis. There have been instances where WHO was caught grossly unprepared with its course of action. Other times, the scientists and researchers at WHO have made laughable errors while preparing reports. This begs the question: Why WHO makes so many mistakes? Is it deliberate? Or is there some other reason behind WHO’s never ending list of errors?

Working backwards, beginning with the CON-VID-19 scam-demic, here are WHO’s top ten blunders.
 

WHO Blunders in Coronavirus Risk Assessment”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Who’s Who At The W.H.O?

The health agency plays a critical role in the globalists’ development of the New World Order system


This report examines the history of the leadership of the World Health Organization, and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.

 

 
 
 

 

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
Please Support Us With A Purchase








Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Worthy of Support














Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 365

Stats
3379 Pages Viewed
539 Unique Visits
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase