Editor's Note: Funny, once they stole the election from Trump, suddenly things like this are happening all over the place. The WHO had DELIBERATELY instructed everyone to use very high cycles on PCR test in order to produce mostly false-positive results, to create the perception of an out-of-control pandemic. They know damned well they have been LYING to us all from the very start! The PCR test is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TEST! It is a process developed to manufactures samples for clinical research. It CANNOT detect viral infections. They have been improperly using the PCR process to control the perception that a pandemic is occurring and then used to manufacture the perception that their dangerous vaccines are being successful. Increase the cycles used, you create "more cases." Decrease the cycles and you create the perception of "fewer cases" which makes everyone think it's because of the wonderful vaccines. THEY ALL KNOW ANYTHING OVER 35 CYCLES WILL CREATE MOSTLY FALSE POSITIVES, which is why they have been instructing to use 40 cycles or more! Fauci admitted this recently. Watch the video here.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned experts not to rely solely on the results of a PCR test to detect the CCP virus.
In updated guidance published on Jan. 20, the WHO said that lab experts and health care practitioners should also consider the patient’s history and epidemiological risk factors alongside the PCR test in diagnosing the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.
The new guidance could result in significantly fewer daily cases.
“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information,” the guidance says.
It’s unclear why the health agency waited over a year to release the new directive. The WHO didn’t reply to an inquiry from The Epoch Times.
Scientists and physicians have raised concerns for many months of an over-reliance on and a misuse of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool since it can’t differentiate between a live infectious virus from an inactivated virus fragment that is not infectious.
Additionally, the high cycle threshold values of most PCR tests—at 40 cycles or higher—increases the risk of false positives. A higher threshold value indicates less viral load and that the person is less likely to be infectious, while a person with a lower cycle threshold value has a higher viral load, or is more infectious.
The WHO did not specify what the threshold value cutoff should be for a positive diagnosis, but said to only “determine if [a] manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.”