TheDailySignal.com

The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on the pivotal transgender case U.S. v. Skrmetti, and both the lawyers arguing against a Tennessee ban on “gender-affirming care” and three Supreme Court justices made dubious claims and stated outright falsehoods in support of experimental transgender “treatments.”

Tennessee’s SB1 bans medical procedures on minors for the purpose of “enabling a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or “treating purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity.”

The American Civil Liberties Union, representing the parents of minors who claim to identify as the opposite sex and claim to have benefited from these procedures, sued to block the law, and the Biden administration joined the lawsuit on the ACLU’s side.

TheGatewayPundit.com

Millions of women and girls across the country can breathe a sigh of relief as the Biden regime was blocked from implementing its radical changes to Title IX in several states.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported in April that the Regime proudly announced that women would be forced to allow men in their locker rooms and bathrooms with a 1577-page Title IX ruling. Moreover, they would be forced to accept men on their sports teams.

Now, this will not happen. As CNN reported, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday smacked down a request from the Regime to implement the rule in 10 states after being blocked from doing so by lower court federal judges. The rule is also blocked in 16 other states as part of ongoing lawsuits.

TheGatewayPundit.com

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas questioned Jack Smith’s authority as special counsel in his concurring opinion on the high court’s presidential immunity ruling.

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 6-3 that Trump has absolute immunity for his core Constitutional powers.

Former presidents are entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts.

The Supreme Court ruled there is no immunity for unofficial acts.

TheGatewayPundit.com

THE COURT RULES FOR TRUMP!

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 6-3 that Trump has absolute immunity for his core Constitutional powers.

The court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers.”

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of former President Donald J. Trump, establishing a precedent for presidential immunity in criminal cases involving official acts during a president’s tenure.

The ruling, stemming from the case Trump v. United States, underscores the constitutional protections afforded to the highest office in the land, ensuring that a former president cannot be criminally prosecuted for actions taken within the scope of their official duties.

The case arose from an indictment against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith, accusing him of conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The charges included spreading claims of election fraud and attempting to obstruct the certification of the election results.

Trump’s legal team argued that these actions, fell within the scope of his official duties as President, and therefore, he should be immune from prosecution.

TheGatewayPundit.com

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine, fundamentally altering the balance of power between the judiciary and federal agencies.

The ruling, which came in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al., marks a significant shift in the balance of power between the branches of government.

The Chevron doctrine, established in the 1984 case Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, has long been a source of contention. It granted deference to federal agencies in interpreting ambiguous statutes, effectively allowing unelected bureaucrats to make laws through their regulatory actions.

However, by a 6-3 majority, the SCOTUS has now declared that such power is unconstitutional and goes against the principles of democratic governance.

__

“Today is a win for justice. It’s a win for fairness. It is a major repudiation of this vengeful, destructive, petty Department of Justice.”@julie_kelly2 joins Steve Bannon to discuss the Supreme Court’s Fischer v. United States ruling on the obstruction charges brought against… pic.twitter.com/c09EPtGUcY

— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) June 28, 2024

TheGatewayPundit.com

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has overturned the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) use of 1512(c)(2), a statute pertaining to obstruction of an official proceeding, in cases related to the events of January 6th (J6).

This ruling signifies a major win for those political prisoners and is seen as a significant setback for the Biden regime.

This decision reveals that the Department of Justice unlawfully prosecuted over 350 Americans for their participation in January 6—a blatant misuse of the law aimed at punishing those who protested Biden’s election and at criminalizing political dissent.

The DoJ and U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves are prosecuting Donald Trump under 4 counts of protesting the 2020 presidential election.  Two of the four charges are for violating 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2) and (k) for conspiring to do so.  Because the other two counts are fuzzy, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Trump could collapse in an ocean of vagueness without the only two clear counts.

TheDailySignal.com

The Supreme Court struck down a lower court’s injunction preventing the federal government from pressuring Big Tech companies to suppress free speech in a pivotal ruling Wednesday.

The court did not rule on the question of whether the government may pressure social media companies to suppress speech in a way that would be illegal for the government to do itself. Instead, the court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to establish Article III standing to bring the case.

‘We will look at the Supreme Court and figure out what can be done
about that extremely corrupted and contaminated body.’

TheFederalist.com

Democrats are so desperate to keep the Supreme Court from torpedoing their lawfare efforts against former President Donald Trump that members like Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., are openly vowing to launch a coordinated attack on the judicial branch if they don’t get their way.

Last week, The New York Times published a smear piece on Justice Samuel Alito “to indict the conservative judge as a partisan ideologue corrupted by far-right politics” all because an “Appeal to Heaven” flag flew outside his New Jersey beach home last year, my colleague Tristan Justice explained. The story came days after another hit piece alleged Alito was compromised because of an upside-down American flag flown by his wife.

The Supreme Court voted to rein in the power of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate wetlands in a complex decision issued on May 25, the second time in a year that the court has curbed federal environmental authority.

Infowars.com

House Democrats have introduced a bill Thursday that would enforce “accountability” of the Supreme Court by establishing an Office of the Inspector General within the Judicial branch to oversee Supreme Court Justices.

The “Judicial Ethics Enforcement Act of 2024″ co-sponsored by Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) seeks to create “effective oversight” of the Supreme Court to “restore public trust” in the institution.