By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

On Friday an FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.

The panel voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of an experimental vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and the potential risk of heart inflammation – especially among young men.

The FDA hearing prior to the decision was stunning. The hearing was 8 hours long and it included SHOCKING testimony from American doctors.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial than it is harmful for teenage boys.

Dr. Fraiman told the FDA panel he has NOT seen that those who show vaccine hesitancy are uninformed. “That is not what I’ve seen… The vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more COVID deaths and devastation than most people have.”

Dr. Fraiman went on to say he cannot assure a nurse associate who is 30 that the vaccines are safer than catching the virus is for a healthy woman her age.

Dr. Peter McCullough joins Alex Jones with the most current revelations about what's really going on with the "alleged" FDA approval, top FDA officials resigning and much, much more info that totally destroys the "Official COVID Narratives."

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Thursday sent a letter to Dr. Janet Woodruff, acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, demanding answers to five questions pertaining to the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Thursday sent a letter to Dr. Janet Woodruff, acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), demanding answers to five questions pertaining to the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine.

The FDA on Aug. 23 granted full approval to Pfizer’s vaccine, over the objections of some scientists who pointed out that full approval was based on only six months’ worth of data — despite clinical trials designed for two years — and that there was no public discussion of the data.

In his Aug. 26 letter, Johnson asked questions similar to those raised earlier this week by Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryl Nass about the legal distinction between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization, and Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which was granted full licensure.
 

In his letter, Johnson asks these five questions:

1. Why didn’t the FDA grant full licensure for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that is in use and available in the U.S.?

2. How are the Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines “legally distinct” and what are the “certain differences”?

3. There is no doubt that the FDA’s action will lead to more vaccine mandates and increased pressure on those currently choosing not to get vaccinated. Your letter to Pfizer suggests that “there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution.” Is there sufficient supply in the U.S. of the Comirnaty vaccine to ensure that those being vaccinated under mandates will be receiving the FDA-approved version? Or is it more likely (or certain) that they will be vaccinated using the vaccine administered under the reissued EUA?

4. If there is insufficient supply of Comirnaty vaccines for those succumbing to the coercion of mandates, isn’t the FDA de facto endorsing vaccine mandates utilizing EUA vaccines?

5. Will individuals who receive either vaccine be afforded the same legal protections if they are injured by the vaccine? If not, why not?

This isn’t the first time Johnson has written the FDA about COVID vaccines. On Aug. 22, he sent a letter to Woodcock; Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, criticizing the FDA’s decision not to hold a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss Pfizer’s application for full approval of its vaccine.

In July, Johnson held a news conference with families injured by the vaccines, during which he said the medical community was “repeatedly ignoring” the vaccine-injured.

By Erin Elmore
BizPacReview.com

The original purpose of a recent article about the FDA was to quickly and cheekily lambaste them for having a pathetic Instagram account where they brag about blue checkmark status and use exclamation points to boast that the account is verified!

Yes, the Food and Drug Administration, a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services behaves like a teenage influencer.  Yes, our nation’s oldest comprehensive “consumer protection” agency that can trace its roots back to the creation of the Agricultural Division in the Patent Office in 1848 is busy engaging in Instagram banter and trying to persuade users of the platform to get vaccinated via the comment section.  What’s next, an FDA-approved milk crate challenge or the Applebees TikTok dance?

No. What’s next is far more sinister and deadly. Social media behaviors aside, the general credibility of the FDA should be evaluated.

According to Harvard University, FDA-prescribed drugs are the fourth leading cause of death in America. This doesn’t even include deaths and hospitalizations from overdosing, errors, or recreational drug use — those incidents would increase this total.  This article went from a cringe piece to writing a warning: the FDA is dangerous and everyone should know it.

Nearly everyone from the mainstream media to politicians to incentivized group-think doctors blindly trust the FDA. They shouldn’t.  Neither should you.  Hearing that a substance is FDA approved, should not give us a sense of security or reliability.  According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, approximately a third of the drugs that are approved and deemed safe by the FDA have major safety issues.

According to a study conducted by Yale professor Joseph Ross, of 222 new therapeutics approved by the FDA between 2001 and 2010, 32% had safety events arise a median of 4.2 years later.  So, when we hear from air-quotes health experts that the COVID-19 vaccine is completely safe, we should take pause.  Four years is a long time.

Attorney Robert Barnes details the latest SCAM to justify forcing more people to be vaccinated against their will with mandates justified by a bogus FDA approval charade.  The problem for Big Pharma is, with this approval, Pfizer has to disclose "exactly what is in the cocktail" and all the side effects which are not currently included in the packaging so you know they will SLOW WALK this process.   Also, Branes says they will probably be liable for damages caused by the dangerous cocktail with approval.  If that weren't enough, did you know they won't release the data justifying their approval for something like THREE YEARS!

Editor’s Commentary: The FDA has fully-approve the Pfizer Covid-19 injections in spite of a new study coming out of the United Kingdom that shows they may be the most dangerous of all the shots in mass circulation today.

This is not an accident. Pfizer isn’t the first to get the approval out of luck, bribes, or cronyism. They definitely didn’t earn it through effectiveness; as bad as the numbers have been for all of the so-called “vaccines” throughout the rise of the Delta Variant, Pfizer’s have been by far the worst. And that’s the point.

The more we learn about the vaccines, the worse the narrative becomes. Pfizer’s injections have demonstrated some of the most shocking results. If any of them were in danger of getting a bombshell study proving them dangerous, it’s Pfizer’s. This is one of the reasons why they’re the chosen ones by the FDA. Better to get them through while they’re still viable instead of waiting for another bombshell to drop…

…except it already did. In the article by Arsenio Toledo below, it is revealed that a new study shows the Pfizer vaccines aren’t just ineffective. They’re also potentially dangerous, and not just based on the hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions that have been reported to VAERS. They appear to do permanent damage to the immune system itself. I’ll let Arsenio explain…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

By Arsenio Toledo
AmericanConservativeMovement.com

A study from the Francis Crick Institute in the United Kingdom has found that the Pfizer-BioNTech Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine destroys T cells and weakens the immune system. But pharmaceutical corporations are trying to suggest that the only way to prevent this from happening is for people to get third or booster doses of their vaccines.

T cells are immune cells that can focus on targeting specific foreign particles. They are most commonly studied in relation to their ability to fight cancer and infectious diseases, but they are also essential for other aspects of the body’s immune response.

There are two kinds of T cells: killer T cells and helper T cells. Killer T cells directly attack cells that have already been infected by foreign particles. Helper T cells aid other cells to develop killer cells and stimulate other cells to create neutralizing antibodies.

This study from the Francis Crick Institute focuses on the neutralizing antibodies created by T cells. It analyzes whether the Pfizer vaccine helps the T cells create enough antibodies to fight off the COVID-19 variants.

TheConservativeTreehous.com

The current head of the Food and Drug Administration, Janet Woodcock, is serving in an ‘acting’ capacity only, as her name was never nominated to the senate for confirmation.  Several media outlets are now reporting her name will never be nominated because she cannot pass the confirmation process.

Ms. Woodcock (pictured left) has a rather controversial past from her career work inside the FDA which included the advanced authorization for many opioids that created a massive health crisis.  She was, for all intents and purposes, the key figure inside the FDA who gave the pharmaceutical industry cart blanche authorization to create, market and distribute the pain-killing opioids that led to hundreds-of-thousands of U.S. deaths.

Senator Joe Manchin from West Virginia represents one of the constituencies hardest hit by the opioid epidemic.  Manchin was not going to support Woodcock’s nomination.  In a 50/50 senate, she didn’t stand a chance of confirmation.

It does not seem coincidental that Ms. Woodcock was in position as ‘acting director’ just long enough for the first COVID vaccine to gain FDA approval; and then, presto, the announcement of her dispatch.  Suspicious cat remains, well, suspicious.

WASHINGTON DC – U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration has ruled out nominating Janet Woodcock as the permanent head of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Woodcock, who has served as acting commissioner since Biden took office, has faced firm opposition on Capitol Hill for the job from lawmakers including Democrat Senator Joe Manchin, a key swing vote in the evenly divided chamber, the report said. (read more)

On an unrelated note…. I’m not trying to be harsh or anything, but tell me that lady doesn’t look like the perfect East German replacement for Angela Merkel…. just sayin’.

The FDA has officially approved the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine. What most don’t realize is what they are justifying this on. According to the announcement released by the FDA, they’ve found it’s 95% more effective in protecting you from getting COVID-19 within seven days of being injected than if you haven’t gotten the jab. Plus, there’s a lot of other bombshells in their announcement…

FreedomFirstNetwork.com

Today is the day that the FDA has officially approved the very first COVID-19 vaccine. For the Left, they’ve been waiting for this day to throw it in our faces that we need to get The Jab after all of our complaints about it not being FDA approved. I’m expecting businesses to immediately start mandating these injections at rapid pace now, which will cause many of us with concerns to have a difficult road ahead of us.

Unfortunately for us, the vast majority of Americans just look at the headlines. Today, that headline is dedicated to the FDA approval of the Pfizer “Vaccine.” If you take the time to read the “science” that the FDA uses to justify this approval, it will literally shock you.

Well, then again, it may not shock you if you’ve been following along with my show Let’s Talk Right Now every Monday through Friday at 10am PT and understand the lies and deceit surrounding the COVID-19 “pandemic” and the corresponding “vaccines.”

According to the FDA Announcement letter released today, the FDA made its decision based on the “data, and review of manufacturing information regarding product quality and consistency,” as well as their committee vote that was conducted December 10, 2020… which was EIGHT months ago. This vote was conducted after a Pfizer study in which they kept tabs on how many people died from the vaccine, but didn’t release that information because it wasn’t a part of the study. You literally can’t make this kind of stuff up.

By Adam Salazar
Infowars.com
 

An FDA slideshow presentation regarding Covid vaccines last year accidentally displayed a long list of possible adverse reactions to the vaccine, including myocarditis, seizures and even death.

The slide, showing the FDA’s draft list of “possible adverse event outcomes,” appeared briefly during a public meeting by the US Food and Drug Administration’s Product Advisory Committee on Oct, 22, 2020 reviewing the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines.

💉 side effects accidentally shown at FDA presentation 2020 appeared for split second at 2:33:40 of original timing of FDA presentation Oct 22nd. During that split sec, screen showed adverse effects of 💉 which FDA knew about in Oct 2020, even before they allowed it. pic.twitter.com/y85PaD4tsR

— ☣ Gawjus_G ☣ (@gawjus_g) July 28, 2021

The slide is headlined, “FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change***.”

Editor's Note: It should be noted that there are several other effective, safe and inexpensive treatments other than HCQ that are being deliberately suppressed as well to protect MASSIVE FUTURE VACCINE PROFITS.

HUGE! Noted Yale Epidemiologist: Dr. Fauci and FDA Have Caused the 'Deaths of Hundreds of Thousands of Americans' that Could Have been Saved with treatment using Hydroxychloroquine.

TheNewAmerican.com

Risch, it should be remembered, can not be easily dismissed. He is both a PhD and an MD, having received the former from the University of Chicago in 1980 and the latter from the University of California, San Diego, in 1976. He is currently professor of epidemiology (chromic diseases) at the Yale School of Medicine where, according to his Yale profile, he has researched “ovarian cancer, pancreas cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal and stomach cancer, and of cancers related to usage of oral contraceptives and noncontraceptive estrogens. His research interests, Yale says, include the “effects of reproductive factors, diet, genetic predisposition, histopathologic factors, occupational/environmental/medication exposures, infection and immune functioning in cancer etiology.” As if this is not enough, Risch has authored “more than 325 original research publications in the medical literature” and is “Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and Member of the Board of Editors, the American Journal of Epidemiology.”

He is, in other words, an enormously successful and respected epidemiologist. And, he strongly suggests that Fauci and his minions are killing people by standing in the way of the use of hydroxychloroquine. Moreover, Risch charges, Fauci has done this before, condemning Americans suffering from HIV to death by standing in the way of another simple drug treatment in the late 1980s.