By Joe Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

Much of what is presented below comes from the good work of Kevin Moncla

The Georgia audit held in November 2020 after the election that provided the corrupt Secretary of State support that the election in his state was fine was not fine itself.  Some damaging information provided through a FOIA request confirms this.

In January we determined that the firms selected by Maricopa County in Arizona to perform audits of the 2020 Election were not certified when they were selected by the county as had been claimed.

One of these firms selected by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to perform the audit there for the country was also used by corrupt Brad Raffensperger in Georgia in performing an audit there in November 2020 after the early November election.  We noted therefore that the audit there was not performed by a certified auditor since Pro V&V was not certified at that time.  This clean audit opinion was given after looking at no ballots from the election.

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

German officials defended the security of their elections at a meeting this week. Dr. Theil stressed the fact that Germany does not have voting machines like in the US and therefore their elections are more secure.

Even Europe knows the US elections are a fraudfest.

Via Deutsche Welle

At a press conference on Wednesday flanked by the heads of Germany’s election authority, domestic intelligence agency, the BfV, and cybersecurity agency, the BSI, Seehofer laid out the security threats to Germany’s election and how the authorities are planning to fend them off…

…Thiel was also keen to underline the fact that Germany does not use voting machines, like in the US. “We don’t have a situation with voting machines that we may know from the US. The actual voting procedure at the polling station is old school,” said Thiel. “When I explained to a senior official from the Interior Ministry recently that it works with paper and pencil, he said, ‘that reassures me’.”

We have no voting machines — at the end of the day, it’s the ballot paper that gets counted,” he said. Thiel also went on to stress that any citizen has the right to walk in and watch the votes being counted.

Voting systems in both countries have been subject to similar accusations, but are structured differently.

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

In recent closed meetings the government’s Election Assistance Commission (EAC) eliminated the requirement that banned voting machines from connecting to the Internet.

The AP reported (emphasis added):

Key elements of the first federal technology standards for voting equipment in 15 years should be scrapped because language that would have banned the devices from connecting to the internet was dropped after private meetings held with manufacturers, according to a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday.

The lawsuit against the U.S. Election Assistance Commission [EAC], filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., claims those meetings should have been open and that changes to the draft standards should have been shared with the commission’s advisory and standards boards. The lawsuit seeks to have those changes set aside.

The standards, approved in February, did not include draft language that would have banned wireless technology from voting equipment under federal certification guidelines. Voting security experts say the machines will be vulnerable to hacking without such a ban.

While the commission’s certification guidelines are voluntary, multiple states use them to set mandatory requirements for voting equipment.

TheGatewayPundit.com

Last week, Judge Amy Totenberg unsealed a long-anticipated report by Michigan University’s Professor J. Alex Halderman.  According to a tweet summarizing his findings, Prof. Halderman claimed that not only did they find “critical issues”, such as an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability, but that these flaws remain unpatched.  And will not be patched until after the 2024 Presidential Election, despite CISA releasing a security advisory and Dominion, in response, creating an update to the software.  Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has been aware of the issues for two years now, and with 18 months to go until 2024’s election, he will not update the machines to help secure these vulnerabilities.

Prof. Halderman states in his blog based on the report that “the most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction.  This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.”

While Halderman offers an overview of how malware can be spread throughout a county with simple access to the EMS, he also explains in the report how this can defeat the testing of the machines in two ways:  one through Hash Validation and the other through Logic and Accuracy Testing.

Hash Validation

Let’s start with the SHA-256 Hash Validation.  Hash Validation is a method of checking that the system itself is exactly the same as the system that was installed.  Any changes should return a SHA-256 hash that does not match the hash provided.

TheGatewayPundit.com

In June 2022 The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft reported that an Obama judge had sealed the much anticipated Halderman Report on election voting machines using in Georgia.

Corrupt Obama Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of an investigation of voting machines in Georgia.  This report has still not been released.  This week CISA released a report showing material discrepancies in these systems while attempting to downplay these material issues. 

Corrupt Obama Judge Amy Totenberg s the sister of NPR’s far-left correspondent Nina Totenberg.

(Above Otero County Commission at the beginning of the day making the pledge of allegiance.)

The Otero County Commission had a long day of discussions and reports today and then they landed upon the issues with the 2020 Election.  They voted to eliminate voting machines in the county!

TheGatewayPundit.com

Maricopa County’s ballot printer source, OKI Data Americas, recently responded to the County’s sham ballot printer investigation, debunking false claims and demanding a corrected report from the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.

According to OKI’s statement, Maricopa County did not even contact the company, and they were “completely unaware that an investigation was underway.”

The Gateway Pundit reported on Maricopa County’s Ballot-on-Demand Printer Investigation led by former Arizona Supreme Court Justice Ruth McGregor.

TheGatewayPundit.com

CISA released its much-anticipated report on Dominion Voting Machines on Friday afternoon before the weekend.

Last Saturday, CNN admitted that Dominion Voting Machine Software has flaws that can be exploited.

You should find the following stories and information extremely disturbing.  We have taken an awful lot for granted in this country because most of us felt we could trust our government and felt that the citizens charged with the election process are actually interested in producing an accurate counting of all of our votes.  Well, it's pretty clear that our trust is totally misplaced and it's falling to ordinary citizens like Bev Harris, to hold the people running elections accountable.  Nobody in the media will spend any time investigating the election process, how votes are actually counted, and the massive security holes every step along the way.  We pay ridiculous amounts of money to the government and yet it's becoming increasingly clear that WE are going to have to monitor our election process ourselves, like hawks, if we ever hope to actually get an honest election.

These videos and audio interview demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that our elections are a total sham and the last thing we can do is trust those conducting them.

The government pays a couple corporations millions upon millions of dollars for voting machines that are proven to be easy as pie to hack and on top it it, provide no secure system for counting the votes.  And paying the big bucks for a recount only goes to expose the fact that the system is utterly incapable and unwilling to provide honest results.

If our votes are not counted accurately, we have no power over our government.  It's just that simple.  The following info demonstrates we don't even have the most minimal security in place to ensure votes are not tampered with.  The ballots are routinely put in cardboard boxes, secured with nothing more than flimsy tape.  It's absolutely a crime we should all be up in arms about.  At the very least, some of those millions should have been spent on establishing a secure chain of custody procedure and something like lockable, metal boxes to put the ballots in, with key card access that records exactly who accesses them.

Vote Fraud Expert Convinced Chain of Custody is Corrupt

by Paul Joseph Watson

Fresh from her confrontations in New Hampshire during which public officials were grilled about slapdash chain of custody and ballot box tampering issues, Bev Harris is now convinced that a "criminal enterprise" is running the primary recount.

Harris was fundamental in the vetting and production of the HBO special Hacking Democracy, and has contributed towards bringing charges against vote fraudsters who cheated in Ohio in 2004.

Harris traveled to New Hampshire personally to discover for herself the disgraceful lapses in chain of custody for the memory cards and ballot boxes used in the recent primary

Embarrassed Diebold officials apologized after one of their electronic voting machines prematurely revealed the winner of our upcoming sham election.