Who's Online
Guest Users: 586

Stats
212 Pages Viewed
103 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • CDC (Center for Disease Control)

CDC Changed Definition of Breakthrough COVID-19 After Emails About ‘Vaccine Failure’


 

TheEpochTimes.com

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) altered its definition of COVID-19 cases among the vaccinated, leading to a lower number of cases classified as a breakthrough, according to documents obtained by The Epoch Times.

The CDC in early 2021 defined the post-vaccination cases as people testing positive seven or more days after receipt of a primary vaccination series, according to one of the documents.

The definition was changed on Feb. 2, 2021, to only include cases detected at least 14 days after a primary series, another document shows.

“We have revised the case definition,” Dr. Marc Fisher, the lead of the CDC’s Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigation Team, wrote to colleagues at the time.

The rationale for the change was redacted.

A CDC spokesperson defended the altered definition.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

CDC’s ‘Chest’ Feeding Completely Ignores Infant Safety, Nutritional Needs


Editor's Note: The CDC is a totally captured agency and is nothing but a massive public menace at this point.  It does not have any concern for the health of the public.

 

 

Mercola.com

For years world health leaders have encouraged mothers to breastfeed their babies exclusively for the first six months of life, as a mother’s milk provides a range of health benefits for the infant.

Now, the CDC is endorsing “chest” feeding by transgender individuals, with the help of medications to induce lactation and supplementation with pasteurized human donor milk or formula. Well, that may be affirming to transgenders, but it completely ignores the safety and nutritional needs of the baby, says author Michael Shellenberger.

The combination of drugs biological males can use to induce lactation include aspirin, contraceptive pills, anti-nausea medication, heart medication, an antipsychotic, a sedative and an off-label lactation drug called domperidone. What doesn’t make sense is that while biological females are cautioned against these drugs while breastfeeding, no such warnings are given to transgenders.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

CDC Admits Heart Disease Risk Skyrockets 13,200% Following Covid Injections



DiscernReport.com

The top two public health agencies in the United States conducted a joint study showing that the risk of developing autoimmune heart disease among the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is a shocking 13,200 percent higher than it is among the unvaccinated.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered that compared to the background risk in the general population, the risk of myocarditis is 133 times greater in those who took the mRNA injections from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

CDC Covers Up ‘Breakthrough Cases’ by Lowering PCR Cycle Thresholds for Vaccinated People Only


Editor's Note:  We've been reporting for a long time that THIS IS HOW THEY CONTROL THE PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE FAKE PANDEMIC.  They control the cycle thresholds of the PCR process.  If you use higher cycle thresholds you get a lot of false-positive results creating the perception that a while pandemic is occurring.  Lower the number of cycles the PCR process runs and you get a lot of negative results creating the perception that the pandemic is under control, or in this case, to create the perception that the vaccines that aren't vaccines are working.

 

There is no scientific reason to lower the threshold for vaccinated people only. There's simply a narrative they need to protect

By JD Ruker
NOQReport.com

There’s an old saying that goes something like this: “If you torture the numbers long enough, you can make them say anything.” In our Covid-hysteria world, the CDC and other medical organizations have practiced a variation of the saying. If you run enough cycles of the PCR tests, you can make any sample test positive for Covid-19.

For over a year, there have been questions from doctors and scientists about the efficacy of having high “Cycle Thresholds” (Cts) for swab testing for Covid-19. Every cycle doubles the chances of finding a positive case, so 34 cycles will have 16-times more coronavirus materials than a 30-cycle test. There is no consensus about how many cycles should be run to give an acceptably accurate determination of Covid infections. Some doctors say it should be as low as 10. Others go as high as 35.

Some labs where PCR tests are checked will go over 40 or even 50 cycles. This is likely how a pawpaw fruit and goat, neither of which are capable of contracting Covid-19, both tested positive last year in a stunt by Tanzanian President John Magufuli.

The CDC has left the guidelines about the appropriate number of cycles ambiguous from the beginning. As a result, Covid-19 “cases” have skyrocketed at times even though a high Ct threshold can result in false-positives very easily. But things have changed now that tens of millions of Americans have been vaccinated. The CDC suddenly wants limits to the number of cycles but ONLY for those who have been vaccinated.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

FREE Video Library: CDC (Center for Disease Control)


: 10 minutes or less.  : 11- 36 minutes.   : Over 36 min. Fun:

 

  •   Former CDC Chief Refield: Mandating Covid Shots “One of the Greatest Mistakes” . . calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated.
    Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated.  Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research.
  • The CDC Has No Authority To Make Decisions For Americans
    The CDC's job is to do research and provide information. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has admitted that it wants to preserve the CDC's authority and power.  These people who lead these federal health agencies and other bureaucracies, these bureaucrats are unelected and unaccountable. And if they can promulgate rules that then have the full force and effect of the law on every single person in America, that's a huge amount of power. And they don't want to give that up. They are basically preparing for another possible opportunity during which they might want to deploy this power. That's what this is really about.
  • A Brief History of CDC Corruption
    This is a segment from the film PLANDemic II which details a bit of the totally corrupt operations of the CDC. Nothing has changed. They are doing it again with the FAKE COVID-19 PANDEMIC!  This agency has been a menace to socieity from its inception!  YOU CANNOT TRUST ANYTHING COMING OUT OF THE CDC.
  • Whistleblower: How CDC Is Manipulating The COVID-19 Death-Toll
    A Montana based physician has blown the whistle on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is exaggerating the COVID-19 death toll by manipulating Coronavirus death certificates. Dr. Annie Bukacek, MD, is a longtime Montana physician with over 30 years of experience practicing medicine. Signing death certificates is a routine part of her job.
  •   'The CDC is actually a vaccine company' – Robert F. Kennedy Jr
    Watch this RT interview with Robert Kennedy to see how corrupt the CDC is. We cannot trust this corrupt organization with our health. The CDC has a large financial interest in pushing untested vaccines on the public.  WHO is even more under the control of Big Pharma. The organization is corrupt beyond the meaning of the word. “The WHO is a sock puppet for the pharmaceutical industry.” — Robert F. Kennedy .

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Ladapo: "The_CDC, Their House is Crumbling"

DR. LADAPO: “THE CDC, THEIR HOUSE IS CRUMBLING.”


In March 2022, Florida Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, faced significant criticism for advising against the COVID-19 vaccine for children under 17, citing reported risks outweighing the benefits. Now, W.H.O. has rolled back its own recommendation on the vaccine for healthy children and teenagers. Dr. Ladapo joins Del for a nice ‘I told you so’.
 

 

 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

CDC Document Confirms PCR Test Has No Value At Detecting COVID-19 Infection


By Hsaive
JustPaste.it

CDC Admits the PCR Test Will Test Positive with Cold of Flu Virus "

The highlighted limitations below are evidence that the CDC is fully aware that PCR is not capable of diagnosing an infectious coronavirus.

CDC Document dated 07/13/2020

CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)  Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 07/13/2020

Document Link PDF:   http://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

CDC Found COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals Months Earlier Than Previously Known, Files Show


 

EpochTimes.com

The top U.S. public health agency identified hundreds of safety signals for the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines months earlier than previously known, according to files obtained by The Epoch Times.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found more than 700 signals—including acute heart failure and death—for the vaccines in May 2022, the files show.

The CDC detected many of the same signals in July 2022, The Epoch Times previously reported. The new files show that the first time the CDC conducted an analysis called Proportional Reporting Ratio on vaccine injury reports, signals were identified.

The analysis went over reports lodged between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 6, 2022.

The CDC initially claimed it did not run the reporting ratio, a data mining method, on the injury reports made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The CDC later claimed it started the method in February 2021, shortly after the vaccines were rolled out. Both of those claims were false, the CDC ultimately said, adding that it did not start the analyses until March 2022.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

BOGUS COVID TEST - CDC/FDA Smoking Gun of Smoking Guns


• They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find
• This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin

By Jon Rappoport
blog.NoMoreFakeNews.com
 

Quiz: If an agency of the federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a diagnostic test that was used on millions of people; but the test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown; and the lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions of lives; however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis for the test; would you buy what they’re selling?

If your answer is yes, you’re in good company; the company I call Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.

The CDC issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.

The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: CDC Aware of Hundreds of Safety Signals for COVID Jab


 

Story at-a-glance

  • In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. The CDC refused. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has now forced the release of these data, and they are stunning
  • The CDC’s PRR monitoring has identified several hundred safety signals, including for Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and death. In individuals aged 18 and older, there are 770 safety signals for different adverse events, and more than 500 of them have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis and pericarditis
  • In the 12- to 17-year-old age group there are 96 safety signals, and in the 5- to 11-year-old group there are 66, including myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease and vitiligo
  • The proportions of deaths, which were only provided for the 18-plus age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines
  • The FDA is also required to perform safety monitoring, using empirical Bayesian data mining. The Epoch Times asked the FDA to release its monitoring results in July 2022 but, like the CDC, the FDA refused, only to admit in December 2022 they’d confirmed the Pfizer shot was linked to pulmonary embolism

In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. PRR1 measures how common an adverse event is for a specific drug compared to all the other drugs in the database.

According to the standard operating procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is run jointly by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to perform these data mining analyses.

Not only did the CDC refuse to release the data, but it also provided false information — twice — in response to The Epoch Times' questions about the monitoring being performed. As reported by The Epoch Times back in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses were "outside the agency's purview" and that no monitoring was being done by them.

Eventually, the agency admitted it was doing PRRs, starting in February 2021, only to later claim they didn't perform any PRRs until March 2022. The Epoch Times also cited several papers in which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their data mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we find that was all a pack of lies.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
US Debt Clock
Please Support Us With A Purchase






Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Important Web Sites














Who's Online
Guest Users: 586

Stats
212 Pages Viewed
103 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase