by Daniel Greenfield
FrontPageMag.com

If you have Dove soap or Axe deodorant in your bathroom, Lipton tea or Breyers in your kitchen, you're buying Unilever products. The huge British-Dutch multinational made $60 billion last year and is known for its leftist politics. But Unilever may have gone beyond virtue signaling to election interference.

Unilever is one of the biggest foreign companies to join the Facebook boycott by leftist pressure groups.

The boycott’s goal is to suppress conservative speech on social media, especially by President Trump, before a presidential election, by convincing advertisers to withhold ads from Facebook until it complies. While Facebook already censors conservatives, it isn’t enough to satisfy the radicals running the boycott.

Rashad Robinson, the president of Color of Change, one of the leaders of the boycott made that clear in an editorial titled, "Will Zuckerberg dump Trump, or continue to serve him?"

"Facebook also loves its advertisers, and they are increasingly joining the boycott," he boasted. "So who will Zuckerberg choose?"

In an interview with the New York Times, Robinson emphasized that this was about the election.

"Honestly, there is an election and I need to get them to enforce the policies on the books before the fall. I need them to have some real rules around elections and voter suppression posts that actually will apply to Trump and other politicians so he doesn’t do anything dangerous on Election Day or before."

Robinson's examples of the kind of speech by President Trump that he wanted to pressure Facebook into censoring included, "claiming victory early".

The #StopHateForProfit campaign promoted by Color of Change, a radical leftist group, is blatant election interference. And it’s backed by huge foreign multinationals who are interfering in our election.

Unilever's own boycott post blatantly referenced the election, stating, "there is much more to be done, especially in the areas of divisiveness and hate speech during this polarized election period in the U.S".

A huge foreign company was pressuring Facebook to interfere in America's presidential election.

And it wasn't alone.

by L Todd Wood
CD Media

Its Time To Level With The Public Mr. President To What The Left Is Really Doing

Let’s start with some facts.

We know the Chinese Coronavirus was developed in a lab in Wuhan, with gain of function capability…in other words, a man-made bioweapon. This has been reported widely.

We know the Obama administration moved the research into COVID-19 from UNC to Wuhan years ago, as the ‘research’ had become illegal in the United States. We know the American government funded the Wuhan lab and COVID research. We know Bill Gates ran a simulation of a coronavirus outbreak as late as October of last year.

We know the Chinese intentionally spread the virus to the West, while preventing travel inside China. This has been confirmed by The White House.

We know that Dr. Anthony Fauci initially downplayed the virus, saying Americans had nothing to worry about, parroting the corrupt World Health Organization. The affect of this action was to allow the virus to spread in the West.

We know the timing of this viral release is Waaay too convenient, coming right after the impeachment charade and right before the 2020 presidential election.

I’m sorry, but I learned a long time ago that if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s most likely a duck.

THE LEFT, AIDED BY COMMUNIST CHINA, IS USING CHINESE CORONAVIRUS AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!

We know Democratic Party politicians are using the lockdowns to hurt the Trump economy, something President Trump confirmed recently. This means these pols are intentionally hurting American small business, American employment, American self-reliance, all traits of Trump supporters.

Despite the recent coronavirus alleged surge in southern states, three states—New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts—account for about 42 percent of COVID-19 deaths in America. Why?

In a recent article in The Atlantic, Thomas Chatterton Williams decried America’s handling of the coronavirus.

The words “utter disaster” are used, and Williams, an expatriate, contrasts America’s response to that of France, where he currently lives.

“As Donald Trump’s America continues to shatter records for daily infections, France, like most other developed nations and even some undeveloped ones, seems to have beat back the virus,” Williams writes.

To be sure, the US response to the coronavirus was far from perfect (more on that later). But the article shows one of the challenges with this pandemic: even as more data is acquired, the picture doesn’t always get clearer.

In some ways, COVID-19 data are like a Rorschach blot from which writers, politicians, and experts can glean whatever conclusions they wish to find. Take Sweden, where daily COVID-19 deaths recently reached zero.

According to Newsweek editorial director Hank Gilman, Sweden’s “lighter touch” approach was a failure because seven times as many people died there than in neighboring Scandnavian countries such as Finland and Norway. He is not alone in the assessment.

On the other hand, Sweden suffered far fewer deaths per capita than several European neighbors that instituted strict lockdowns—including Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom—and has avoided some of the economic fallout other nations have endured. Unlike other countries, its currency is growing stronger.

Indeed, Sweden’s death rate is remarkably close to that of France, which Williams praised as a model in contrast to the “utter disaster” in the US. However, the US actually has a lower per capita death rate than both Sweden and France—at least for now. (While it’s true COVID cases are on the rise again in the US, deaths recently reached three-month lows.)

This raises questions about how we measure success in the age of COVID-19. While most attention is being paid to rising case numbers, death tolls would seem to be the most important metric. While US deaths per capita (401/1M) put the country among the ten highest in the world—ahead of France and Sweden, but just below the Netherlands—those numbers also don’t tell the entire story.

Few may have noticed that 42 percent of all COVID deaths in the US come from just three states—New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. These three states account for nearly 56,000 of the nearly 133,000 deaths in the US, even though they represent just 10 percent of the population. If these three states are excluded, the US suddenly finds itself somewhere in between nations such as Luxembourg (176/1M) and Macedonia (166/1M), where some of the better fatality numbers in Europe are found.

3 US states—New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts—account for roughly 42% of all #COVID19 deaths in America.

These same states represent 10% of the US population. pic.twitter.com/AS6DyG3822

— Jon Miltimore (Parler: @Miltimore79) (@miltimore79) July 7, 2020

Why have New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts suffered so much more than other US states? We don’t yet know the answer to that question, but evidence suggests it could be policy related.

Loving the people you lead is the most basic prerequisite of leadership.

From TheConservativeTreeHouse.com

A weak and pathetic Arizona Governor, Comrade Doug Ducey, is irrationally responding to an increase in positive COVID-19 tests by shutting down most of the state’s recreation activities.  The state’s common sense leadership structure has collapsed under media pressure to comply with politically motivated demands.  Irrational fear now rules.

For three straight months the media took their talking points from political activists who were coordinating a national panic.  The drumbeat was testing, testing, testing… all narrative engineering efforts were specifically structured around testing.

By taking this approach those who were weaponizing fear knew that any increased test rate would be fuel to demand extended lock-downs.  They need this process to continue through the November 2020 election cycle; testing provides fuel for that narrative.

PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona’s governor ordered bars, nightclubs and water parks to close again for at least a month starting Monday night — a dramatic about-face as coronavirus cases surge in the Sunbelt.

Republican Gov. Doug Ducey also ordered public schools to delay the start of the classes at least until Aug. 17. Many districts planned to start the school year in late July or early August. His orders can be extended.

“We can’t be under any illusion that this virus is going to go away on its own,” Ducey said.

Arizona emerged from stay-at-home order in mid-May, but infections have since begun spiking. On Sunday, it reported 3,858 more confirmed coronavirus cases, the most in a single day for the state and the seventh time in recent days that the daily toll surpassed the 3,000 mark. (read more)

By Onar Åm
LibertyNation.com

After the Civil War, the Republican Party was utterly dominant. It successfully abolished the institution of slavery but not the party that advocated it. Why did Republicans allow the Democratic Party to exist? Why did they allow the Democrats to build Confederate statues and install Jim Crow laws? It is the same reason for which the United States allowed Germany and Japan to rebuild after World War II.

Background

In 1861, President Abraham Lincoln brought the Republican Party to power on a wave of anti-slavery sentiment in the West. Britain had abolished slavery just a few years earlier in the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833, and Lincoln was prepared to do the same in the United States.

The southern slave states, governed by Democrats, wanted none of it and seceded from the Union, which led to the worst constitutional, political, and civil crisis in American history. At the end of the Civil War, nearly three-quarters of a million mostly white men had died on the battlefield.

In 1864 election, Lincoln chose Democrat Andrew Johnson as his running mate. That choice was dictated by a strong desire for national unity and healing. Lincoln wisely understood that winning the war was not enough. Wounds had to be healed, bonds had to be re-established, and trust had to be rebuilt.

However, when the Democrat ally John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln in 1865, the United States found itself with a Democrat as its president. President Andrew Johnson used his power for a quick restoration of the former Confederate states without protections for the former slaves. The Republican-dominated Congress impeached him for abuse of power, but he survived in the Senate by a single vote.

However, the Republicans also wanted to bring the seceded states back into the fold without vengeance, and so as part of that process, the Confederate states could keep their dignity. They could raise statues commemorating their fallen soldiers and their generals.

It was a similar strategy the United States used in Germany and Japan after World War II. By allowing them to rebuild and be part of the world community, they generated friends and allies for the future and ended the cycle of war.

Dinesh D’Souza documented in his book Death of a Nation: Plantation Politics and the Making of the Democratic Party that the Democrats created the Ku Klux Klan and the Jim Crow laws in the former slave states in the late 19th and early 20th century. Due to the Republicans’ respect for federalism, they did not intervene – until they pushed through the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

Republican Amnesia

Forgiveness and rebuilding after total victory can be a powerful method for a winner of war to create lasting peace. However, the Republican Party was so eager to let bygones be bygones that it purged its own roots and history. Amazingly, Republicans forgot they were the party that abolished slavery.

Such self-imposed amnesia allowed academics of the left to rewrite history, absolving the Democratic Party of all sin. The entire history of America’s racial divide, Jim Crow, and slavery was projected onto the very people who rid the country of these horrors.

History is Important

One of the main reasons that history is important is to teach future generations not to repeat the mistakes of the past. Another reason for not forgetting the past is to prevent professors with malicious motives to rewrite history and gaslight innocent people.

His name is Damani Felder, and he has something to say to the radical leftists and the Democrat leadership. He just started a YouTube channel with his sibling called “The Right Brothers,” and their motto is “identity politics is dead.”

By Newt Gingrich
FoxNews.com
 

Every time some supposed conservative or Republican explains why he or she can’t vote for President Trump, I wonder if they have thought about the alternative – the Biden-Schumer-Pelosi machine.

Our choice in November will not be between President Trump and President Perfection. It will be between President Trump and a nightmare that would end America as we have known it.

If former Vice President Joe Biden wins, it means the turnout in favor of Democrats will be such that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., remains leader of a Democratic majority in the House. It also means that Democrats will almost certainly gain control of the Senate, making Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the majority leader.

Given control of all three instruments of power, what would the Biden-Schumer-Pelosi team do?

This is not a question that requires wild speculation. As I outlined in a series of podcasts at Gingrich 360, Pelosi’s $3 trillion HEROES (Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions) Act – ostensibly designed to help our economy recover from the coronavirus downturn – by itself contains enough radicalism to be terrifying.

The legislation would legalize all people currently in the U.S. illegally. It would block federal immigration officers from deporting even criminals and gang members. It would give major Democratic donors a huge tax break by reestablishing unlimited deductibility for state and local taxes.

The measure would pay for abortion with taxpayer money. It would release prisoners indiscriminately, so that at least six of the most infamous serial killers would be eligible for release. It would pour money into corrupt local governments and bail out the most wasteful states in America.

You Are Being Used! Black female conservative Samantha Mason @samanthamarika1 destroys the leftist narrative that the Democratic party cares about the black community.