Who's Online
Guest Users: 602

Stats
4256 Pages Viewed
1092 Unique Visits

New Users
LibertyTess
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • Pandemics/COVID-19/Viruses

Video: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai - Lockdown Lunacy: “Experts” Promote Panic and Pandemonium

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai crushes Dr. Fauci, exposes Dr. Birx, the Clintons, Bill Gates and the WHO


By Kelleigh Nelson
Source: NewsWithViews.com

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. —Benjamin Franklin

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground. —Thomas Jefferson

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. —Edmund Burke

But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty once lost is lost forever. —John Adams

Today the fear of contagion gives government cover for its assaults on freedom and poses a question the government does not want to answer: If liberty can be taken away in times of crisis, then is it really liberty; or is it just a license, via a temporary government permission slip, subject to the whims of politicians in power.

The President has handled this nightmare as best he could, considering he is surrounded by sharks and people who are not really advising him well on the science and he’s having to deal with Dr. Fauci/Dr. Birx both of whom are embedded into the scientific community which has created an unfortunate lie about the immune system and the solution to infectious disease.  The 15-minute video with MIT scientist and biological engineer, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai crushes Dr. Fauci, exposes Dr. Birx, the Clintons, Bill Gates and the WHO.

 

 
 
 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Whistleblower: How CDC Is Manipulating The COVID-19 Death-Toll


"Based on how death certificates are being filled out you can be certain the number is substantially lower than what we are being told. Based on inaccurate, incomplete data people are being terrorized by fear mongers into relinquishing cherished freedoms.”
- - Dr. Annie Bukacek

A Montana based physician has blown the whistle on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is exaggerating the COVID-19 death toll by manipulating Coronavirus death certificates. Dr. Annie Bukacek, MD, is a longtime Montana physician with over 30 years of experience practicing medicine. Signing death certificates is a routine part of her job.

In a brief video presentation, Dr. Bukacek blows the whistle on the way the CDC is instructing physicians to exaggerate COVID 19 deaths on death certificates:

Few people know how much individual power and leeway is given to the physician, coroner, or medical examiner, signing the death certificate. How do I know this?  I’ve been filling out death certificates for over 30 years.

More often than we want to admit, we don’t know with certainty the cause of death when we fill out death certificates. That is just life. We are doctors, not God. Autopsies are rarely performed and even when an autopsy is done the actual cause of death is not always clear. Physicians make their best guesstimate and fill out the form. Then that listed cause of death… is entered into a vital records data bank to use for statistical analysis, which then gives out inaccurate numbers, as you can imagine. Those inaccurate numbers then become accepted as factual information even though much of it is false.

So even before we heard of COVID-19, death certificates were based on assumptions and educated guesses that go unquestioned.  When it comes to COVID-19 there is the additional data skewer, that is –get this— there is no universal definition of COVID-19 death.  The Centers for Disease Control, updated from yesterday, April 4th, still states that mortality, quote unquote, data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19.  That’s from their website.

Translation? The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same. They call it death by COVID-19. They automatically overestimate the real death numbers, by their own admission.  Prior to COVID-19, people were more likely to get an accurate cause of death written on their death certificate if they died in the hospital. Why more accurate when a patient dies in the hospital? Because hospital staff has physical examination findings labs, radiologic studies, et cetera, to make a good educated guess. It is estimated that 60 percent of people die in the hospital. But even [with] those in-hospital deaths, the cause of death is not always clear, especially in someone with multiple health conditions, each of which could cause the death.

Bukacek refers to a March 24 CDC memo from Steven Schwartz, director of the Division of Vital Statistics for the National Center for Health Statistics, titled “COVID-19 Alert No. 2.”

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Researcher Predict Virus/5G Crisis In 2018


In this hard-hitting and prophetic interview from May 2018, Dr. Edward Group and Alex Jones break down the dangers of 5G that’s now gaining massive worldwide attention, forcing governments to conflate it with the coronavirus outbreak in a bid to discredit 5G skeptics.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

The CDC Admits About 90% of Coronavirus Hospitalized Patients Have Underlying Conditions


Editor's Note: What part of "THEY LIE TO US ALL THE TIME" don't you understand!? The stats are virtually the same for people who die from the seasonal flu stains. They have people believing COVID-19 "IS WORSE THAN THE SEASONAL FLU." It's not. It's just different and so far the COVID-19 strain 'IS NOT" MORE DEADLY than the seasonal flu.

 

By Dr. Susan Berry
Breitbart.com

Nearly 90 percent of U.S. coronavirus patients who have been hospitalized have underlying health problems, or comorbidities, reports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), released Wednesday, focuses on hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with confirmed coronavirus disease, or COVID-19.

CDC reports among 1,482 patients from 14 states who were hospitalized with COVID-19 in March, 74.5 percent were 50 years of age or older, and 54.4 percent were male.

According to Dr. Shikha Garg and associates, during the month of March, among 178 (12%) adult patients with data on underlying conditions, 89.3% had one or more underlying conditions:

[T]he most common were hypertension (49.7%), obesity (48.3%), chronic lung disease (34.6%), diabetes mellitus (28.3%), and cardiovascular disease (27.8%).

Medscape provided a bar graph of the data regarding underlying conditions of those hospitalized for the infection caused by the novel coronavirus that originated in China:

 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Letter To Dr. Anthony Fauci


By Bill Sardi
LewRockwell.com

Excuse me, Dr. Fauci

Shall I get my measles immunity papers also?  You mean I can’t go to work or even get a job without having papers showing I have antibodies against each and every pathogenic disease or others can sue me if they believe I infected them?

And why do I need proof I developed antibodies against COVID-19 coronavirus when the seasonal flu is more harmful, that is according to what the Centers for Disease Control says.  Some 36,000 deaths from influenza every flu season and supposedly only 12,000 deaths from coronavirus this year.

How about my influenza papers, and chicken pox papers, and polio papers, and tuberculosis papers given that migrants in the U.S. spread TB bacterium all over America?

And I’m sure you are talking about proof of having sufficient antibodies from natural exposure to COVID-19 coronavirus, but even antibodies won’t ensure you won’t get the disease again.  I don’t have to inform you about that as you are the preeminent infectious disease specialist in the US being in charge of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, so I hope I’m not educating you about that.

And what about the 240 other vaccines that are under development?  Will we need papers for all of those too?  Don’t you think having to inoculate children and adults for over 100 different pathogenic bacteria and viruses would be absurd?  Maybe even insane?

Dr. Fauci, you certainly learned, or should have learned, that the trace mineral zinc is required to make memory T-cells in your thymus gland.  And with sufficient zinc, exposure to ANY pathogenic bacteria or virus, whether we are exposed to them via vaccination or naturally from circulation in the community, will produce memory antibodies that provide life-long immunity.  In other words, vaccines don’t work very well without zinc and we may not even need vaccines if zinc is going to facilitate antibody production from any and all pathogens, do we?

Dr. Fauci, you need a zinc suppository, stat!  Your ideas are as old as Dr. Edward Jenner and his cow pox technology of yesteryear.  Today zinc replaces all those vaccines.  They didn’t tell you this in your virology course in college?

Dr. Fauci, you first.  Show us your papers that you have antibodies against each and every common infectious disease.  Then maybe we can talk.  Until then, go back home and stay in your room.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Media Panicked Over Chloroquine But New Data Suggests It's Ventilators That Are Killing People


The media for weeks has been throwing a fit over President Trump touting "unproven," potentially "deadly" hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for coronavirus but they've been hyping the clear and present danger of America not having enough ventilators without ever questioning their effectiveness.

It turns out ventilators appear to be killing coronavirus patients en masse.

From AP, "Some doctors moving away from ventilators for virus patients":

NEW YORK (AP) — As health officials around the world push to get more ventilators to treat coronavirus patients, some doctors are moving away from using the breathing machines when they can.

The reason: Some hospitals have reported unusually high death rates for coronavirus patients on ventilators, and some doctors worry that the machines could be harming certain patients.

[...] Mechanical ventilators push oxygen into patients whose lungs are failing. Using the machines involves sedating a patient and sticking a tube into the throat. Deaths in such sick patients are common, no matter the reason they need the breathing help.

Generally speaking, 40% to 50% of patients with severe respiratory distress die while on ventilators, experts say. But 80% or more of coronavirus patients placed on the machines in New York City have died, state and city officials say.

Higher-than-normal death rates also have been reported elsewhere in the U.S., said Dr. Albert Rizzo, the American Lung Association’s chief medical officer.

Similar reports have emerged from China and the United Kingdom. One U.K. report put the figure at 66%. A very small study in Wuhan, the Chinese city where the disease first emerged, said 86% died.

Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, an ER and critical care doctor from New York City, concluded that ventilators were doing more harm than good over a week ago and suggested oxygen as a superior treatment:

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Why Are We Ignoring all the Contrarian Scholars on COVID-19?


By Daniel Payne
TheCollegeFix.com

Media ratings and political calculus, maybe?

A few months into the coronavirus panic here in this country, and one thing is clear: People love bad news. Headlines obsessively chart each new case and each new death; medical doctors are constantly on television and in news media warning us that “the worst is yet to come,” that “the fight is just beginning,” that this is the “new normal” and that we won’t be able to resume typical social conventions “for a long time.”

You might think it’s a universal consensus that this disease is both world-ending and here to stay. Yet many scholars—a growing amount of them, more and more every day—are sounding the alarm on what they’re calling a major overreaction to this disease: epidemiologists, public health officials, preventative medicine experts, professors and numerous other academics have all been raising red flags regarding the draconian, ongoing response to the coronavirus outbreak here, namely by pointing out that lockdowns are ineffective, unwise and destructive policy that will put millions out of work while doing little to halt the spread of the disease.

Why is nobody paying attention to them? Are they less credentialed, more inexperienced, less trustworthy? None of those things are true. There are, rather, likely two elements here: In the first place, much of the media are largely invested in terrifying, scary headlines and news stories meant to shock and frighten readers with seemingly grim and dire predictions: Readers, for whatever reason, will often keep returning to news sources that scare the living daylights out of them. We’re a strange species.

Government officials, too, are very much invested in promoting doomsayer scenarios, simply because that’s what they’ve been doing all along: We’ve been told from the beginning that this is a once-in-a-century pandemic that could result in literally millions of deaths if major, disruptive, open-ended government measures are not taken to combat it. It would be humiliating, and in some cases politically suicidal, if they were to entertain the less-panicky models and projections, let alone endorse them. Better to just keep heralding the end of the world even as the data get better on a daily and sometimes hourly basis.

There are differing, dissenting opinions on this pandemic from scholars and academics who can be trusted. They’re worth listening to. Don’t be afraid to seek them out.

MORE: Stanford epidemiologist warns that coronavirus crackdown is based on bad data

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

It’s Time to Ask: Is “Virus Science” Any More Accurate than “Climate Science”?


By Debbie Georgatos
AmericaCanWeTalk.org

America has gone from what may have been history’s strongest economy to total shutdown and near depression in less than 60 days.   It has gone from the land of the free and the home of the brave to a nation of meek serfs bowing to police state totalitarian government edicts to stop working and stay at home, or else. And it has done so in face of a pandemic that has claimed less than half the lives already estimate to be claimed by the ‘regular flu’ this flu season.

Joe Everyman has the ability to see all of this, call BS, and say WTH?   Why can’t anyone at any level of government?

Ah! But the science!!! The science told us this could result in millions of deaths; the science told us hospitals will be quickly overwhelmed; the science told us we can’t possibly have enough ICU units; the science told us we must shut down everything, maintain social distancing, rat on our friends and neighbors to give us even a fighting chance to contain this apocalypse, and no one should ever question science.

Plus this wasn’t just the 97% consensus of scientists who’ve been 0 for 41 on their predictions as to climate change, this was the almighty Dr. Anthony Fauci himself telling us these things! And he’s a friend of Bill Gates!

Let’s look at the famous scientific model of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), funded by Bill and Melinda Gates (H/T Derek Hunter, “Is What We’re Being Told About the Coronavirus Wrong?“).

On April 4th, the IHME model predicted there would be between 120,963 and 203,436 Americans requiring hospitalization, with the average of that range being 164,745.

In reality, there were 18,998. Missed it by 84%..against the low end of the prediction.

Same model…the average projected ICU beds needed on April 4th was 31,057.

The reality was 4,686. Missed it by 85%.

And of course, the infamous Imperial College model told the UK to expect a half million deaths—and sent the whole country into panic, sadly including PM Boris Johnson—before revising downward to 20,000. Missed it by 96%.

But it’s science. You flyover idiots don’t understand…models can be off, sure, but don’t be a denier. Besides, it’s better to be safe than sorry. And if the shut down of America saved even one life, it’s all worth it! In science we trust.

Somehow Americans were able to turn away from the siren song of climate alarmists; they could sense how climate computer models, while increasingly sophisticated, are still only as good as the assumptions and inputs and algorithmic correlations and calibrations built into them. And as much as ‘hockey stick’ Michael Mann sought the iconic status in climate science that Dr. Anthony Fauci has in ‘virus science’, his scientific credibility was questioned, and didn’t hold up under scrutiny. He never became an oracle.

So what explains Americans’ abject capitulation to the apocalyptic predictions of virus science that they so naturally resisted in the case of climate science?

Well, there’s obviously a much, much longer history of medical research and knowledge and therapeutic results by comparison to the relatively new domain of climate science.   And real pictures of sick and suffering people with COVID-19 move the emotions far more immediately and significantly than a staged-to-convey-a-false-impression picture of a stranded polar bear on a piece of floating ice. Plus everyone has a doctor or nurse in their family or their circle of friends and relatives, and they are generally good people who chose their profession in large part due to a desire to help sick people recover.  They can be trusted.  Few people know a climate scientist.

So the population at large is educated by the culture to assign much, much higher credibility to a pandemic model than a climate change model.

But at the end of the day, here we are: living through hell on the basis of pandemic models’ predictions of calamity, and not one of those on whom the ‘experts’ are relying has been anywhere close to accurate, and ALL have erred in the same direction: to grossly overestimate the danger. Dr. Fauci ought to be out of a job.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
US Debt Clock
Please Support Us With A Purchase






Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Important Web Sites














Who's Online
Guest Users: 602

Stats
4256 Pages Viewed
1092 Unique Visits

New Users
LibertyTess
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase