Who's Online
Guest Users: 1124

Stats
13731 Pages Viewed
1871 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • PCR Tests/Virus Tests

Video: Inventor of the PCR Test Kary Mullis Exposes Dr. Anthony Fauci For Who He Really Is!


Kary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR test so if anyone would know whether the test is being used properly or not it would be Kary Mullis. In these clips, Kary makes it quite clear what he thinks of Dr. Anthony Fauci and how his test is being misused to deliberately manufacture the false perception of pandemics that don't actually exist. The pandemics are not viral pandemics but rather FAKE TESTING PANDEMICS!

If you're not already aware, the PCR process Mullis invented is not a "test".  It's a manufacturing process to quickly replicate a tiny sample of something you want to do research on.  Prior to Kary's PCR process it was extremely difficult to replicate samples. 

The PCR process was never intended to be used for diagnostic purposes.  But people like Anthony Fauci realized it could be used to control the public perception of the spread of fake pandemics.  It's ideal for that purpose because if you use a high number of cycles, you can produce the perception of a LOT of positive results. (a cycle is running the PCR process one time to double the sample, two cycles doubles the sample again, etc., etc.) x

So everyone is instructed by the CDC, Fauci, etc., to run the PCR test at high cycles to get a LOT of positive results to make everyone believe a virus is running wild.  Then, when you roll out a fake and dangerous vaccine to make BILLIONS on, you run the tests and a lower number of cycles and, oh lookie!  We get a lot of negative results making people believe the vaccine is working.  You couldn't come up with a better way to manufacture a market for your products when the products are drugs!  The whole thing is a massive criminal hoax.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

For The First Time, A US State Will Require Disclosure of PCR 'Cycle Threshold' Data In COVID Tests


Editor's Note: THIS is the key to ending all this COVID FRAUD INSANITY!!  The entire scam is driven by this fraudulent test that isn't even a diagnostic test.  It's a process created by Kary Mullis to quickly replicate material for research purposes.  IT IS NOT EVEN A TEST.  IT'S ESSENTIALLY A MANUFACTURING PROCESS.  The PCR process is being misused by people like Dr. Fauci because they can manufacture the perception that a pandemic is occurring by controlling the cycles used in the PCR process.  Fewer cycles and you get a lot of negative results.  More cycles you get A TON OF POSITIVES (false positives).   What they don't tell you is the PCR process CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER AN ACTUAL INFECTION IS OCCURRING.  It cannot detect whether the sample is alive or dead.  That's why the vast majority of people allegedly testing positive have no symptoms of any infection.  BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SICK!  The CDC itself has admitted the PCR test is WORTHLESS for diagnostic purposes: CDC Document Confirms PCR Test Has No Value At Detecting COVID-19 Infection

 

ZeroHedge.com

We have detailed the controversy surrounding America's COVID "casedemic" and the misleading results of the PCR test and its amplification procedure in great detail over the past few months.

As a reminder, "cycle thresholds" (Ct) are the level at which widely used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can detect a sample of the COVID-19 virus. The higher the number of cycles, the lower the amount of viral load in the sample; the lower the cycles, the more prevalent the virus was in the original sample.

Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect that data.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic


The perception that a pandemic is occurring has been created by a
totally fraudulent testing process called the PCR TEST

“The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

“…All or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.”

Dr. Michael Yeadon: former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer

This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.

.Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Michael Yeadon - THE PANDEMIC IS OVER! No second Wave!


Former Vice President and Chief Science Advisor at Pfizer Pharmaceutical Mike Yeadon discusses his thoughts as to why the lockdown was a mistake, and why the government strategies to manage the pandemic are only making things worse. Dr. Yeadon exposes the massive amount of misinformation and flat-out LIES being told to the world population, especially how they are using the entirely unreliable PCR test to create a false perception of the virus wielding spreading.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Landmark Legal Ruling Finds That Covid Tests Not Fit For Purpose

So What Does MSM Do? They Ignore It


Court finds that a positive test does not correspond to an actual COVID case
could be as little as 3% accuracy


By Peter Andrews
RT.com

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centred on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

The verdict, delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority. This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favour of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test – the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

How They'll Fake the Success of the COVID Vaccine


by Jon Rappoport
Blog.nomorefakenews.com

I’ve described how the major clinical trials of the COVID vaccine are designed to prevent nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever [1] [2].

The whole plan to gain FDA approval of the vaccine is a stark fraud.

Now let’s move on to the next con: how to make it seem the vaccine is a roaring success.

Brief background: My readers know I’ve presented a complete case to show the SARS-CoV-2 virus was never proved to exist in the first place [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. So the whole idea of a vaccine is a non-sequitur, an absurdity. Likewise, the PCR test for “the virus” is a fraud on several levels [11]:

For example, the number of “cycles” for which the test is set is a key factor. Each cycle is a huge amplification of the tissue sample taken from the patient.

When you blow up that tissue sample above 34 cycles, you get gigantic numbers of false-positive results, even by the standards of the test. Fauci has admitted it. I’ve pointed out that FDA guidelines nevertheless recommend doing the test at up to 40 cycles. This alone explains reports of “rising COVID case numbers.”

Let’s say Pfizer and then Moderna win FDA approval to release their vaccines in the US. With the military doing the logistics of shipping, millions of doses move out, and soon, an extraordinary number of Americans are lining up to take the shot.

After a suitable period of time, the elite medical planners will change the way the PCR test is done. The number of cycles will be drastically reduced. That order will go out to labs in the US.

What does this mean? It means that far fewer positive test results will occur.

Therefore, the trend of “new COVID cases” will stop rising. It will level off, and then it will fall.

This rigging will be heralded as proof that that vaccine is producing a victory over the virus.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Smoking gun: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

Confession from the “beloved” expert of experts


The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart

By Jon Rappoport
blog.nomorefakenews.com

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote:
 

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.

“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.

All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [2]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”

Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [3] Here are money quotes:

“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

“Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

Get the picture?

I hope so.

If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

How Vaccine Makers Learned To Create Pseudo-Epidemics Like Covid-19

Why Covid-19 Will Never End


By Bill Sardi
LewRockwell.com

Hey, if the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic is a hoax as some claim, it would have to fool a lot of university-trained microbiologists.  But surprisingly this isn’t the first time modern medicine has been completely fooled by a pseudo epidemic.  Yes, the COVID-19 pandemic is fake, obviously much larger than the ones that preceded it, but totally fake.  How so, you ask?

Mike Hearn, posting plan99.net clued the whole world in to how the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, now used to diagnose COVID-19 coronavirus infections, fooled three major medical centers into mistakenly believing they were being besieged by a whooping cough epidemic in the years 2004-2007.

Hearn’s report dated July 26, 2020 was entitled: Pseudo-Epidemics: Why COVID-19 Is Guaranteed To Never End.  Few people paid attention to Hearn’s report that likened what happened during suspected infectious disease outbreaks at three major medical centers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Tennessee, to our modern-day COVID-19 calamity.

Post up an online claim that COVID-19 is a hoax and you will be subjected to massive ridicule.  Lay people who have amateurishly claimed COVID-19 is a hoax have reportedly died of this infectious lung disease.  Government propagandists parade testimonies of those who thought COVID-19 was a hoax until they were infected themselves.  But these patients really don’t know they had a COVID-19 infection, they were just told that.

But there really IS a COVID-19 coronavirus that is killing hundreds of thousands of humans on planet earth, right?  That’s what infection control officers thought when they were dealing with a lot coughing workers who obviously had something.

Well, a lot of people are dying of anything, ~8000 a day in the U.S., ~150,000/day  worldwide.  The question is, are they dying of COVID-19?

How do we know, after locking down entire populations inside their homes during winter cold and flu season that these excess death numbers aren’t a result of a lack of sunshine vitamin D rather than a corona cold virus?

If it is not COVID-19, what else could it be?

A Reuters Fact Checking team says in 92.8% of deaths COVID-19 was “found to be the underlying cause of death.”  But frankly, there is no study showing COVID-19 is singularly causal for death, at least not yet.

Strikingly, if prior pseudo-epidemics offer any lesson it is that the rate of false positive tests for COVID-19 approaches 100%!

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Did the CDC Disprove There is a COVID Pandemic?


Brian Wilson compiles and breaks down information released by the Centers for Disease control that contradicts the claim that novel coronavirus 2019 should be classified as an international pandemic.

From the CDC's 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Instrucitons:

Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses.  The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.  Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.

 

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Research: COVID-19 Tests May be Detecting Traces of DEAD Virus, Giving ‘False Positives’ and EXAGGERATING Pandemic

Oxford scientists examined 25 studies on the widely-used polymerase chain reaction test, the most common test used


RT

New research has discovered that coronavirus tests may be finding dead traces from weeks-old infections, resulting in false positives that inflate the scale of the pandemic.

The study was carried out by experts from the University of Oxford’s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England. It found there was a risk of “false positives” because of how Covid-19 testing is being conducted.

The scientists discovered that, despite people with Covid-19 being infectious for only around a week, one test used to detect the disease can still give a positive reading weeks after the patient has recovered.

The team examined 25 studies on the widely used polymerase chain reaction test, which is used to determine if someone has the virus in their system. The test takes a sample from a suspected Covid-19 case and uses a process that increases the amount of DNA, or genetic material, in the sample, to enable it to be examined.

The research found that the tests can amplify coronavirus genetic material that is not a viable virus and no longer capable of causing an infection.

Professor Carl Heneghan, one of the authors of the study, said there was a risk that a surge in testing across the UK was increasing the risk of this sample contamination occurring and it may explain why the number of Covid-19 cases is rising but the number of deaths is static.

“Evidence is mounting that a good proportion of ‘new’ mild cases and people re-testing positives after quarantine or discharge from hospital are not infectious, but are simply clearing harmless virus particles which their immune system has efficiently dealt with,” he wrote in The Spectator magazine.

Professor Heneghan said an “international effort” was required to avoid “the dangers of isolating non-infectious people or whole communities”.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
US Debt Clock
Please Support Us With A Purchase






Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Important Web Sites




















Who's Online
Guest Users: 1124

Stats
13731 Pages Viewed
1871 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase