Who's Online
Guest Users: 590

Stats
7479 Pages Viewed
1598 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • Pandemics/COVID-19/Viruses

THIS Is Why They Moved The Fear Porn Goal Post From COVID Deaths to COVID Cases


Editor's Note:  THIS IS WHY THEY MOVED THE FEAR PORN GOAL POST FROM REPORTED DEATHS TO REPORTED "CASES" FOR THEIR CURRENT FEAR PORN ASSAULT. This chart below is from the CDC web site.  

What they ARE NOT TELLING YOU is we have more cases because theirs more testing and THEY ARE NOT TELLING YOU that for 99.9% of the newly reported cases, NOBODY IS EVEN SICK! They are all asymptomatic.  They are scaring the crap out of you by deliberately implying that a positive test means a death sentence! TOTAL DELIBERATE LIE.
 

 Source:  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

How COVID-19 Fatality Reports Are Distorting the Data on Daily Death Rates

Health departments publish two fatality figures; the media pick the more frightening one.


 

By Daniel Payne
JustTheNews.com

Seven months into the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, state governments and media outlets continue to publicize confusing, misleading data on the spread of the disease here, perpetuating fears that deaths from the virus are skyrocketing on a daily basis even as those fatalities are generally distributed across a period of days, weeks or even months. 

At issue is how state health departments publicize daily reports of fatalities within the state's borders. State health officials have for months been publishing two sets of mortality statistics: deaths that occurred on the publication date in question, and deaths that have only recently been catalogued from state backlogs. 

The Arizona Department of Health Services publishes both of those figures on its coronavirus dashboard: On its "Summary" page, it lists the "number of new deaths reported today," while on its "Covid-19 Deaths" tab, the state lists the actual "deaths by date of death."

The distinction is a critical one: The state's "new deaths" every day do not actually reflect the number of coronavirus fatalities Arizona has logged in the past 24 hours, but rather the number of COVID-19 deaths it has identified from both new and older death certificates. 

Health department spokeswoman Holly Poynter confirmed to Just the News on Friday that the state's "new deaths" figure is not drawn exclusively from the most recent 24-hour period of fatalities. 

"While we had 91 new deaths reported today, the graph [on the dashboard] shows them by the actual date of death," she said on Friday. "Although those 91 were reported today, it doesn't mean today was the date of death. Those deaths may have occurred at any time on the graph but were simply reported today."

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai - The Real Truth About Coronavirus, According to MIT Biologist


Editor's Note: Everyone's ignorance about what viruses are and ignorance about how our immune system works is being exploited big time! The MSM and Globalists have ZERO interest in providing any genuine understanding. They are only interested in manipulating you into doing what they want.

 

Dr. Shiva will explain, “Viruses do not harm or kill us.” 
 

A screenshot of a slide from his broadcast that a lot of people may find shocking.

 

by 
 

Two days ago, we published an article about Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT biologist, after he posted a tweet sharing his concerns about the the coronavirus and how the “fear mongering on coronavirus will go down as biggest fraud to manipulate economies.” The article is the most read story since the inception of our website, and has since gone viral online. Within 24 hours, the story attracted over half a million unique visitors.

Now, Dr. Shiva just came out with a follow-up video that goes into a great detail to explain the real truth about coronavirus and why as a nation, we need to focus more on immune health. He also expressed his concerns about lack of understanding about the complexity of the body immune systems among the people advising our government. Dr. Shiva is not alone in talking about the importance of immune health. Other research have also shown also boosting our immune health can help reduce the risk of infectious diseases and supporting recovery if we do get sick.

Before we dive right in, here is a little background about Dr. Shiva. He has four degrees from MIT. He graduated from MIT in 1986 with a degree in electrical engineering and computer science. He has done extensive research at the molecular level and he was also speaker at National Science Foundation for the science of information on the immune system. Dr. Shiva also also holds a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from MIT. In 2004, he returned to MIT to work on a Ph.D. in systems biology, a relatively new field that integrates biology, engineering and computer science.

Below is a broadcast he did yesterday on Periscope. Enjoy!

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

The Clown Cars Are Fully Loaded And Dr. Fauci’s Is Leading The Parade

When it comes to the topic of clown cars, we’d say Dr. Fauci gets a limo version all to himself.


Yesterday he uttered the following incoherent babble, saying the recent surge in new cases is because the Virus Patrol didn’t go far enough in throwing 50 million Americans out of work:

We did not shut down entirely,” Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said. “We need to draw back a few yards and say, ‘OK, we can’t stay shut down forever.’ …You’ve got to shut down but then you’ve got to gradually open.”

Got that?

What does this pretentious old windbag think—-that the blooming, buzzing mass of a $21 trillion economy can be calibrated up and down by the week via some magical dimmer switch?

Never mind because he was then on to this preposterous comparison:

Fauci also said he expects the public to compare the Covid-19 pandemic to the 1918 pandemic flu, which killed around 50 million people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Well, it so happens that the U.S. death rate from the Spanish Flu was 655 per 100,000 persons (675,000 deaths in a population of 103 million). That’s obviously orders of magnitude larger than the 39 per 100,000 deaths to date from the Covid.

In fact, the impact of the Spanish Flu was not only 17X greater in terms of the overall mortality rate, but it was also a true Grim Reaper in the sense that it struck across the entire age spectrum of the population (dark blue bars).

It actually started in the giant domestic military training compounds stood up by Woodrow Wilson to join a European war that was none of America’s business, but the virus did kill tens of thousands of 18-30 year-old draftees in their own barracks long before they got to the killing fields of France.

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/deaths%20covid%20vs%20spanish%20flu_1.jpg?itok=NJQ1-nGM

By contrast, as we now surely understand, and you would think Fauci would, too, the Covid (light blue bars) is primarily a harvester of elderly persons already struggling with life-threatening respiratory, heart, vascular, renal and diabetic illnesses.

Accordingly, among the 191 million Americans under the age of 45 years, there have been only 1.5 WITH-Covid deaths per 100,000, while for the elderly, the opposite is true. Nearly 70,000 or more than 60% of all WITH-Covid death have been among the 75 years and older population, resulting in mortality rates as follows:

  • 85 years & Over: 581 per 100,000 persons;
  • 75-84 years: 200 per 100,000 persons;

Now, you don’t need to take a single class in epidemiology to understand a core truth: That is, when nearly 60% of the population under 45 years accounts for only 2.5% of the reported WITH-Covid deaths and has a rounding error mortality rate, while the 6.5% of the population 75 years and older accounts for 60% of the deaths—you don’t fight the disease with a one-size-fits all strategy of generic locksdowns, quarantines and social regimentation.

And surely you don’t shutdown the schools, gyms, bars, restaurants, movies, ball games, concerts, beaches, theme parks etc. because the vulnerable elderly don’t patronize these venues in appreciable numbers anyway, and could easily be warned to stay strictly away.

The key point, however, is that this whole unspeakable Lockdown Folly does not remotely stem from the “science”, as the MSM supporters of Fauci claim.

It’s just a hair-brained experiment in social control that happened because the Donald was too weak, ill-informed, distracted and innumerate to send Fauci and his camarilla of doctors and vaccine-peddlers packing when the mid-March guidelines were first issued by the CDC.

Yes, the Donald’s political enemies in the ranks of big city mayors and Blue State governors have feasted upon the chum Fauci & Co have persistently tossed into the fetid waters of national politics, but that doesn’t let Trump off the hook.

If the truth be told, this is the Trump Lockdown Folly and ranks among the greatest blunders ever committed by a US President. That’s because even at this late date nearly four months into the resulting economic disaster:

  • there is no evidence that asymptomatic persons are transmitters of the virus,
  • there is powerful statistical evidence that 95% of the population can cope with the disease and recover if they do become infected.

Yet, the twin pillars of Fauci’s hair-brained social regimentation scheme assumes they very opposite: Namely, that healthy Americans must be put under house arrest because they are silent spreaders and killers of their fellow citizens; and that the disease is so virulent that its #1 enemy—the powerful immune system of every healthy American—cannot be trusted to do its job if the virus is permitted to follow its natural course of contagion and eventual herd immunity.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Kristi Noem Protected Her State’s Economy — And Kept People Safe

She resisted the pressure to lockdown.


 
by Ellie Gardey
Spectator.org
 

Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota announced Thursday that her state achieved a $19 million surplus for the 2020 fiscal year.

For Noem, one of five governors who did not issue a stay-at-home order, it was a vindication of her hands-off approach to the COVID-19 pandemic, which protected her state’s economy while at the same time safeguarding the health of the people of South Dakota.

“As many states closed their economies, I trusted South Dakotans to make the right decisions for themselves and their loved ones,” said the 48-year-old Republican governor in announcing the surplus. “Our future remains bright because we kept our state open for business and we live within our means.” 

South Dakota experienced one of the smallest outbreaks of the virus in the nation even without the stringent measures imposed on most of the country. This is likely a consequence of the state’s low population density, its rural nature, voluntary social distancing, and the reasonable restrictions Noem did set in place.

Only 116 deaths attributed to COVID-19 have been recorded as of Friday in the state, which has the fifth-lowest population density in the nation and a population of around 880,000. South Dakota has also not experienced a recent climb in cases like many states have — on Thursday, July 16, the state recorded only 42 new cases. 

The surplus is more evidence that South Dakota’s economy has been spared the devastation wrought in other states by the pandemic. 

Across the country, states are facing budgets destroyed by drastically reduced tax revenue and increased spending to fight the virus: Connecticut had a $1 billion deficit for the 2020 fiscal year and New York had a $13.3 billion deficit for the fiscal year, for instance.

Sales and use tax, South Dakota’s largest revenue source, grew 4.6 percent in 2020 over the last fiscal year, according to a press release

South Dakota has also recorded the second-smallest contraction in gross domestic product of any state in the first quarter of 2020, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Only Nebraska, which also did not have a stay-at-home order, fared better. 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Why Face Masks DON'T Work, According To SCIENCE


So much debate over whether or not we should be wearing masks in order to fight C0VlD but multiple scientific studies over the past decade have already settled this question. Not only do medical masks not prevent the spread of virus, but a 1995 study proves that wearing a cloth mask can put you at greater risk for infection. Ben Swann breaks down the science.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

The Face Mask Placebo

New England Journal Of Medicine Admits The Futility Of Wearing Face Masks To Protect Against COVID-19


By Bill Sardi
LewRockwell.com

MASSIVE OUTBREAK OF PUBLIC STUPIDITY AS MASSES FEARFULLY WEAR INEFFECTIVE FACE MASKS IN NEED TO RELIEVE THEIR COVID-19-INDUCED ANXIETY.

Health Authorities Admit Face Masks Don’t Halt Infectivity But The Fearful Masses Need Something To Handle Public Anxiety. Even The New England Journal Of Medicine Admits The Futility Of Wearing Face Masks To Protect Against COVID-19 Coronavirus.

What is desperately needed are valium-laced face masks with drug-laced inserts to facilitate the continued aerosol delivery of anti-anxiety medications directly into the lungs.  Public anxiety over a contrived threat from a mutated coronavirus has the masses acting like frightened sheep.

You mean face masks aren’t going to protect me from getting the dreaded COVID-19 coronavirus?  Answer: They are not.  Invincible Microbe: Tu... Blank, Alison Best Price: $7.88 Buy New $7.99

You mean face masks don’t really keep me from spreading the infection to others?  Answer: No.

Here are direct quotes from The New England Journal of Medicine April 1, 2020 report on universal face masking to protect against transmission of the COVID-19 Coronavirus:

“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…

“The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is… minimal….

“…During the care of a patient with unrecognized Covid-19…. A mask alone in this setting will reduce risk only slightly, however, since it does not provide protection from droplets that may enter the eyes or from fomites on the patient or in the environment that providers may pick up on their hands and carry to their mucous membranes (particularly given the concern that mask wearers may have an increased tendency to touch their faces)…..  

“…Universal masking alone is not a panacea….  

“The extent of marginal benefit of universal masking over and above these foundational measures is debatable….  

“Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety.”

  In fact, by wearing masks you may be delaying others from developing memory antibodies for long-lasting protection against viral infection so our society can return to normal.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

New England Journal of Medicine: Wearing A Mask Outside Healthcare Facilities Offers Little, If Any Protectoin from Infection


Editor's Note:  The FACTS explained below have been well known from the very beginning of this SCAMDEMIC, this massive fraud being perpetrated against us all.  We have lunatic and/or totally ignorant politicians who are acting out of "their own mindless fears or worse, purely political motivations," and corrupt conflicted people and institutions like the WHO, CDC, Fauci, Gates, etc., LYING TO YOU ALL TO KEEP YOU IN CONSTANT FEAR to coerce you into complying with their Draconian nonsense about the need to wear masks all the time!!  The only people that you need to be concerned about spreading a coronavirus are people who are displaying symptoms! You DO NOT NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT SICK! And people who are not sick should not be wearing face masks all the time.

 

Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era

New England Journal of Medicine

By:

  • Michael Klompas, M.D., M.P.H.,
  • Charles A. Morris, M.D., M.P.H.,
  • Julia Sinclair, M.B.A.,
  • Madelyn Pearson, D.N.P., R.N.,
  • and Erica S. Shenoy, M.D., Ph.D.

As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues to explode, hospital systems are scrambling to intensify their measures for protecting patients and health care workers from the virus. An increasing number of frontline providers are wondering whether this effort should include universal use of masks by all health care workers. Universal masking is already standard practice in Hong Kong, Singapore, and other parts of Asia and has recently been adopted by a handful of U.S. hospitals.

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

The calculus may be different, however, in health care settings. First and foremost, a mask is a core component of the personal protective equipment (PPE) clinicians need when caring for symptomatic patients with respiratory viral infections, in conjunction with gown, gloves, and eye protection. Masking in this context is already part of routine operations for most hospitals. What is less clear is whether a mask offers any further protection in health care settings in which the wearer has no direct interactions with symptomatic patients. There are two scenarios in which there may be possible benefits.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

The COVID-19 Lockdown Induced Housing Crisis Of 2020

Millions Of Americans Missed Their Last Rent Payments, And Tens Of Millions Could Soon Be Evicted


By Micheal Snyder
TheEconomicCollapseBlog.com

Most Americans believe that “the worst is behind us”, but the truth is that we are sleepwalking into an unprecedented economic nightmare.

Week after week we continue to get economic numbers that are absolutely horrific, and it appears that we are heading for a housing crisis that will be even worse than what we witnessed in 2008. 

Back then, millions of Americans lost their homes, but this time around it could be tens of millions.

I know that a statement like that may sound overly dramatic, but I believe that many of you that feel that way may change your minds after reading this entire article.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Face Masks Being Mandated by Government Specifically Say They Don’t Protect Against COVID-19

“Anything other than tight-fitting, surgical-grade masks are utterly pointless.”


Editor's Note:  WAKE UP PEOPLE!!  Forcing you to wear face masks IS NOT ABOUT YOUR HEALTH!

 

By Paul Joseph Watson
Inforwars.com

The same type of face masks that the UK government is mandating people wear in shops from July 24 onwards to protect against the spread of coronavirus specifically state on their packaging that they don’t protect against coronavirus.

Genius.

Earlier this week, the government confirmed that anyone caught not wearing a mask when entering a shop or supermarket will be subject to a police fine of £100, prompting the Chair of the London Metropolitan Police Foundation to complain that this would be totally unenforcable.

However, the law states that cloth masks, scarves or other textile items that don’t require the use of hands to hold them in place are acceptable forms of protection against COVID-19.

One problem with that, the packaging on these kind of cloth masks specifically states that they don’t protect against COVID-19.

“This product is an ear loop mask. This product is not a respirator and will not provide any protection against COVID-19 (coronavirus) or any other viruses or contaminants,” states the packaging on a standard set of cloth masks currently being sold.

Skeptics have also pointed out that people continually touching potentially infected masks and then touching surfaces could even exacerbate the spread of coronavirus.

“Apart from everything else, the only coverings the Government is insisting on are cloth ones, which every man and his dog knows are COMPLETELY USELESS,” writes Toby Young.

“As Allison Pearson says in her excellent comment piece in today’s Telegraph, “anything other than tight-fitting, surgical-grade masks are utterly pointless – like trying to stop a bullet with a chain-link fence”. I mean, the evidence that the gold-standard N95 masks are effective in non-healthcare settings is threadbare at best – and they have to be disposed of after a single use.”

“There is literally no evidence that re-usable cloth masks are effective in community settings. None. It’s like wearing a tin foil hat in case you get struck by lightening – an ineffective way to protect yourself from an almost non-existent risk. What has become of us?”

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said mandating the wearing of masks would “give people more confidence to shop safely and enhance protections for those who work in shops,” however many have reacted to the law by asserting that they will simply avoid shops altogether.

This will lead to yet more economic devastation, more high street job losses and in the longer term, more poverty and death.

Again, genius.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
US Debt Clock
Please Support Us With A Purchase






Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Important Web Sites




















Who's Online
Guest Users: 590

Stats
7479 Pages Viewed
1598 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase