| Stats |
Mike Benz: The Four-Letter Agencies are killing the ability to operate an independent website by selectively discriminating against anyone who disagrees with the U.S.
In order for the Deep State to create an effective censorship operation within the United States they had to park it in the only institution engaged in domestic intelligence that doesn't require an act that violates the law for it to expend federal resources to investigate it. At a September 2021 conference, a senior advisor to DHS confessed on tape that what they have done if effectively created a "Domestic CIA" that combined foreign-facing CIA powers that are not allowed domestically with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI but without the oversight. One year later, in 2022, DHS created a domestic intelligence group headed by none other than James Clapper and John Brennan on the day Trump was inaugurated.
FUN FACT: There has been a Bush, a Clinton or a Biden on the ticket of every election since 1976. Think about it. There has been a person from those three families running for either President or Vice President for over the last 4 decades!
Elon Musk exposed how the EU tried to install a backdoor censorship panel to X that would have blanket power to determine what information is allowed on the platform. Alex Jones breaks it all down!
BREAKING: Elon Musk Exposes Secret Illegal Global Censorship System@elonmusk pic.twitter.com/9kj2euqDtS
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 12, 2024
Big Tech coalition Digital Trust & Safety Partnership (DTSP), the UK’s regulator OFCOM, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have come together to produce a report.
The three entities, each in their own way, are known for advocating for or carrying out speech restrictions and policies that can result in undermining privacy and security.
DTSP says it is there to “address harmful content” and makes sure online age verification (“age assurance”) is enforced, while OFCOM states its mission to be establishing “online safety.”
Now they have co-authored a WEF (WEF Global Coalition for Digital Safety) report – a white paper – that puts forward the idea of closer cooperation with law enforcement in order to more effectively “measure” what they consider to be online digital safety and reduce what they identify to be risks.
The importance of this is explained by the need to properly allocate funds and ensure compliance with regulations. Yet again, “balancing” this with privacy and transparency concerns is mentioned several times in the report almost as a throwaway platitude.
NewsGuard, which purportedly “rates” news organizations for their truthfulness, has been described in a Real Clear Wire report as “a powerful censorship tool.”
And constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University whose popular commentary regularly skewers the establishment, has warned against subjecting children in America’s schools to the left-leaning bias of “fact-checkers” like NewsGuard because it “raises the specter of a type of de facto state media.”
Now a report at RedState is revealing U.S. Rep. James Comer, chief of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, is beginning an investigation of the “supposed arbiter of media reliability.”
The goal? Determine the “impact of NewsGuard on protected First Amendment speech and its potential to serve as a non-transparent agent of censorship campaigns.
Chances are, if you’ve been keeping tabs on the COVID “coverup,: you’ve come across this story that began to unfold in 2022. There was a sudden spike in SIDS cases in Ottawa, Canada, where nine babies died shortly after their mothers received the vaccine. One detective, named Helen Grus, took it upon herself to investigate these incidents. Yet, simply for doing her job and delving into the vaccine’s possible role, she found herself suspended and vilified.
The Ottawa police settled with one of the families who felt their privacy was breached, simply because a detective was determined to get to the bottom of their baby’s death, and that’s when Grus was suspended and her life was turned upside down.
Join Tucker Carlson and Mike Benz as they unveil the main driver of censorship in the United States in this eye-opening and informative video. Explore the hidden agendas and powerful forces at play behind the scenes that are shaping the landscape of free speech and expression in the modern age. Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy."
Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear. We must, therefore, be on our guard against extremists who urge us to adopt police state measures. Such persons advocate breaking down the guarantees of the Bill of Rights in order to get at the communists. They forget that if the Bill of Rights were to be broken down, all groups, even the most conservative, would be in danger from the arbitrary power of government.”
—Harry S. Truman, Special Message to the Congress on the Internal Security of the United States (August 8, 1950)
Nothing good can come from allowing the government to sidestep the Constitution.
Unfortunately, the government has become an expert at disregarding constitutional roadblocks intended to protect the rights of the citizenry.
We must act decisively in support and in solidarity with Julian Assange. In this regard, we must understand the history: On how Assange was betrayed and misled by those who allegedly supported him.
In October 2021, the U.S. government began a legal challenge to extradite Julian Assange from the U.K. “to face charges of violating the Espionage Act”. The UK Supreme Court turned down Assange’s appeal to “prevent his extradition to the United States”.
On April 20, 2022, a UK magistrates court formally approved the extradition of Julian Assange to the US “on espionage charges”.
Two days ago, Assange’s final appeal hearing began in the UK’s High Court.
US military contractor Pablo Breuer (left), UK defense researcher Sara-Jayne “SJ” Terp (center),
and Chris Krebs, former director of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (DHS-CISA)
By Michael Shellenberger, Alex Gutentag, and Matt Taibbi
Public.substack.com
A whistleblower has come forward with an explosive new trove of documents, rivaling or exceeding the Twitter Files and Facebook Files in scale and importance. They describe the activities of an “anti-disinformation” group called the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, or CTIL, that officially began as the volunteer project of data scientists and defense and intelligence veterans but whose tactics over time appear to have been absorbed into multiple official projects, including those of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The CTI League documents offer the missing link answers to key questions not addressed in the Twitter Files and Facebook Files. Combined, they offer a comprehensive picture of the birth of the “anti-disinformation” sector, or what we have called the Censorship Industrial Complex.
 |
You can send a check or money order to: The KTAO Project P.O. Box 1086 Crestone, CO 81131 or donate online:  |
| Stats |