• Home
  • Elections/Vote Fraud

Video: Bev Harris: New Hampshire Recount a "Criminal Enterprise"


You should find the following stories and information extremely disturbing.  We have taken an awful lot for granted in this country because most of us felt we could trust our government and felt that the citizens charged with the election process are actually interested in producing an accurate counting of all of our votes.  Well, it's pretty clear that our trust is totally misplaced and it's falling to ordinary citizens like Bev Harris, to hold the people running elections accountable.  Nobody in the media will spend any time investigating the election process, how votes are actually counted, and the massive security holes every step along the way.  We pay ridiculous amounts of money to the government and yet it's becoming increasingly clear that WE are going to have to monitor our election process ourselves, like hawks, if we ever hope to actually get an honest election.

These videos and audio interview demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that our elections are a total sham and the last thing we can do is trust those conducting them.

The government pays a couple corporations millions upon millions of dollars for voting machines that are proven to be easy as pie to hack and on top it it, provide no secure system for counting the votes.  And paying the big bucks for a recount only goes to expose the fact that the system is utterly incapable and unwilling to provide honest results.

If our votes are not counted accurately, we have no power over our government.  It's just that simple.  The following info demonstrates we don't even have the most minimal security in place to ensure votes are not tampered with.  The ballots are routinely put in cardboard boxes, secured with nothing more than flimsy tape.  It's absolutely a crime we should all be up in arms about.  At the very least, some of those millions should have been spent on establishing a secure chain of custody procedure and something like lockable, metal boxes to put the ballots in, with key card access that records exactly who accesses them.

Vote Fraud Expert Convinced Chain of Custody is Corrupt

 

by Paul Joseph Watson

Fresh from her confrontations in New Hampshire during which public officials were grilled about slapdash chain of custody and ballot box tampering issues, Bev Harris is now convinced that a "criminal enterprise" is running the primary recount.

Harris was fundamental in the vetting and production of the HBO special Hacking Democracy, and has contributed towards bringing charges against vote fraudsters who cheated in Ohio in 2004.

Harris traveled to New Hampshire personally to discover for herself the disgraceful lapses in chain of custody for the memory cards and ballot boxes used in the recent primary

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Stephen Spoonamore on Stealing Elections Through Electronic Voting Machine Tempering


It's time for all of us to end our wilful denial and acknowledge that our elections are no longer free and fair. They are routinely tampered with, which means we do not have a democracy. It's a joke. It's time to grow up and face the fact that there are people very interested in stealing elections and they are doing it. If we are to establish an election system that actually provides accurate outcomes, we have to take control of it away from the criminals that control it now.

The good news is we can do this by exploiting the voting system to our advantage to vote out all incumbents and demand the new Congress get rid of ALL electronic voting machines.  We can do this by orchestrating landslide elections AGAINST INCUMBENTS.  The tampering that is going on is an average of 3-5% thrown towards whoever they wish to win.  At worst exit polls have show up to 12%.  So worst case scenario, 88% of the votes are being counted accurately.  So if we can get only 20% of voters to deliberately vote against incumbents, vote tampering won't be able to stop the outcome.

This documentary exposes the vulnerability of computers - which count approximately 80% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections - suggesting that if our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  Below is a clip from the film "Hacking Democracy" that shows exactly what happens all the time with electronic voting machines.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Hacking Democracy


This documentary exposes the vulnerability of computers - which count approximately 80% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections - suggesting that if our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  Below is a clip from the film "Hacking Democracy" that shows exactly what happens all the time with electronic voting machines.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Hillary Clinton Did Use the Fake Dossier She Colluded With Russian On To Influence The Outcome of the Election


Editor's Note: Wow. This has been pretty much scrubbed from everywhere. Hillary DID USE THE FAKE DOSSIER SHE PAID FOR to influence the outcome of the election. Luckily one spot archived it. AND REMEMBER, the info in this fake report CAME FROM THE RUSSIANS!! So who colluded with the Russians to influence the outcome of the election?

 

Carter Page: I Told Government That Hillary Hired Steele DURING The Election

 

By Patrick Howley
BigLeaguePolitics.com

Former President Donald Trump campaign adviser Carter Page said that he reported Hillary Clinton’s role in the anti-Trump dossier to governments during the 2016 election, and he believes that Attorney General Jeff Sessions should not be constrained in the Russia case because he got “poor advice” from the DOJ.

Page said he suspected early on that he was the target of a sting operation involving British intelligence. We now know that British spy Christopher Steele compiled a debunked anti-Trump dossier for Fusion GPS, a firm paid millions by the Clinton campaign.

“I didn’t know for sure before the election, but I knew that the Clinton campaign’s opposition political research were behind the fakeness” of the dossier, Page told Big League Politics in an exclusive interview.

In October 2016, while the election was still going on, Page sent a letter to the inter-governmental Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) — provided to Big League Politics — where he stated: “I have learned from a reliable source that a law firm close to the Clinton campaign has hired a London-based private investigator to investigate my trip to Russia. This approach is closely consistent with past tactics that investigators affiliated with Mrs. Clinton have historically taken toward their targeted victims: ‘Impugn…character and veracity until…destroyed beyond all recognition.'”

The United States government is represented in the OSCE.

As Big League Politics reported, the Hillary Clinton campaign promoted the Christopher Steele dossier DURING the presidential election, using the intermediary of Yahoo reporter Michael Isikoff. The Clinton campaign’s press release on the matter has almost completely disappeared from the Internet, but we found its preserved contents — proving that Clinton used the Steele dossier to influence the election.

Page thinks Sessions can still be involved with the Russia case if he figures out how to dis-recuse himself.

“It’s a little bit more difficult to do an un–recusal there at Justice, but any unbiased and logical review of potential conflicts makes it clear that there’s no reason that he should be constrained,” Page told Big League Politics in an exclusive interview.

“I think he is a good man, and it’s a shame that he was given poor advice by people at DOJ. Showing a similar history, bear in mind how Chairman Nunes was falsely accused of having conflicts of interest. But he patiently fought back and has been able to do great things,” Page told BLP.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Research: Google Search Manipulation Can Swing Nearly 80 Percent of Undecided Voters


 

By Allum Bokhari
Breitbart.com

By inserting negative search suggestions under the name of a candidate, search engines like Google can shift the opinions of undecided voters by up to 43.4 percent, according to new research by a team at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and reported exclusively by Breitbart News.

The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.

His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion.

From the study:

The voting preferences of participants who saw no search suggestions shifted toward the favored candidate by 37.1%. The voting preferences of participants in the search suggestion groups who saw only positive search suggestions shifted similarly (35.6%). However, the voting preferences of participants who saw three positive search suggestions and one negative search suggestion barely shifted (1.8%); this occurred because the negative search suggestion attracted more than 40% of the clicks (negativity bias). In other words, a single negative search suggestion can impact opinions dramatically. Participants who were shown four negative suggestions (and no positives) shifted away from the candidate shown in the search bar (-43.4%).

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

FREE Video Library: Elections/Vote Tampering/Fraud


  • Hacking Democracy
    This HBO documentary exposes the vulnerability of the voting machines counting roughly 80% of the votes cast in our county, state and federal elections - and exposes the fraud, corruption of the Diebold company that produces them.  If our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  These machines are clearly not designed to produce secure, accurate elections.  They are clearly designed to rig them.
  • Stephen Spoonamore on Stealing Elections Through Electronic Voting Machine Tampering
    This is an incredible interview with an expert on electronic machine transactions, namely ATM, secure transactions and what's required to chain of custody and totally secure records.  You will be socked to learn what is opinion is of the equipment we use for our elections.

     

Short Videos

Funny Videos

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Gerrymandering: 'Voters Should Pick Their Politicians -- NOT the Other Way Around'


Gerrymandering is a practice intended to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries. The resulting district is known as a gerrymander, however that word is also a verb for the process.  The term gerrymandering has negative connotations. Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).

In addition to its use achieving desired electoral results for a particular party, gerrymandering may be used to help or hinder a particular demographic, such as a political, ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, or class group, such as in U.S. federal voting district boundaries that produce a majority of constituents representative of African-American or other racial minorities, known as "majority-minority districts". Gerrymandering can also be used to protect incumbents.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)