Help Us Go Viral!


We no longer have the
luxury of time.




Who's Online
Guest Users: 490

Stats
8708 Pages Viewed
1036 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • Viruses/Pandemics/COVID-19

Could the COVID Vaccine Be Canceled Before the First Injection?

Follow-up: the astounding failure of all three COVID vaccine clinical trials


By Jon Rappoport
NoMoreFakeNews.com

I covered this breaking story last week.

I analyzed a startling piece in the NY Times that torpedoed the major clinical trials now underway, headed up by Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.

My readers, who know the devil is in the details, saw how absurd these trials are.

Now I want to go back and fill in a few new facts that round out the picture.

As a result of increased scrutiny and pressure, the vaccine companies couldn’t just say their experimental COVID vaccine produced antibodies, meaning there was a “proper immune response” to the vaccine. That wouldn’t be enough to win FDA approval.

No, they would have to create two huge groups of human volunteers, give one group the vaccine, and the other group a saltwater placebo shot.

Then what?

Then wait. Since these companies believe the coronavirus is everywhere, descending from the clouds and infecting millions of people, they would wait for some volunteers to “catch COVID-19.”

How many volunteers? 150. That’s the magic number.

At that point, the clinical trial would stop. Everything would stop.

The big reveal would take place. Of these 150 cases of COVID-19, how many occurred in volunteers who got the vaccine, and how many COVID-19 cases occurred in the volunteers who got the placebo saltwater shot?

Get it? In other words, this information would show how successful the vaccine was in protecting the volunteers from COVID-19.

What would the vaccine companies be hoping and praying for? A breakdown like this: only 50 COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group, and 100 cases in the placebo group.

Why? Because this would prove the vaccine was 50% effective in preventing COVID-19. And that percentage is all the FDA requires to issue an authorization for the vaccine—an authorization to shoot up all Americans.

Absurd. Preposterous. 150 volunteers determine whether 350 million Americans will be targeted for a vaccine. But that’s not the bottom line in this story.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Dr Mike Yeadon: Pandemic Over, Threat Exaggerated, No 2nd Wave, T-Cell Immunity


In this video, Big Pharma insider Dr. Michael Yeadon is speaking out; confirming what I and many others have been reporting, such as:

✅ The pandemic is fundamentally over;
✅ Science clearly indicates that there will not be a second wave;
✅ Many people have t-cell immunity;
✅ COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically fraudulent;
✅ There are 10 times more false positives than actual positives;
✅ Lockdowns are deliberately based on unscientific, completely fake data;
✅ COVID-19 threat has been greatly exaggerated;
✅ Lockdowns led to tens of thousands of avoidable deaths.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Researcher Suggests Deliberate Chinese Propaganda Campaign Forced World Into Lockdown

Communist regime flooded social media with fake videos and bots to whip up COVID hysteria.


By Paul Joseph Watson
Summit.news

Researcher and attorney Michael P. Senger suggests that the Chinese government launched an aggressive propaganda campaign to exaggerate the severity of coronavirus in order to force the rest of the world into a draconian lockdown that would serve to benefit Beijing.

In an article for Tablet Magazine, Senger details how in late January, “international COVID-19 hysteria began” with a series of suspicious videos posted to social media sites showing people in China suddenly collapsing on the streets, including one instance where a man held out his arm to break his fall, suggesting the collapse was staged.

After tens of millions of people were confined to their homes during one of the most brutally enforced lockdowns in history, Senger notes how in February the CCP “reported an exponential decline in coronavirus cases, until March 19 when they announced their lockdown had eliminated domestic cases entirely.”

China has officially recorded just 4,634 deaths from coronavirus, despite having a population almost five times larger than the United States, where the current death toll stands at over 205,000.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

David Icke - Sept. 26, 2020 Trafalgar Square COVID FRAUD Protest - "WE ARE THE TURNING OF THE TIDE!"


This is yet another EPIC speech by David Icke exposing the TRUTH about the COVID Pandemic Hoax and how we have to STOP COMPLYING WITH OUR OWN ENSLAVEMENT!

 

 
 
 

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Scott Atlas Corrects Deliberate Misleading Statements Made By CDC Director Redfield


FINALLY! Trump has put an honest doctor on the podium! Unlike Fauci, Birx and the likes of Redfield, Dr. Atlas is a doctor that's "actually" interested in providing honest information about the so-called pandemic.

This is a clip from a briefing given by Dr. Scott Atlas in which he corrects one of the many deliberately misleading statements made by the totally corrupt Director of the CDC Robert Redfield. Redfield deliberately cited OLD DATA to falsely claim that 90% of people are still susceptible to getting sick from COVID-19 in order to keep the false narratives going, to keep the fear-mongering going.

One of the most striking things about this briefing is the fact that you can hardly find it anywhere. It's been mostly scrubbed from YouTube. No media coverage. BUT, you can find a TON of articles attacking Dr. Atlas with all the usual smears because he's not perpetuating the "official false narratives" needed to keep the mindless hysteria and fear going.

 

 
 
 

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Who’s Who At The W.H.O?

The health agency plays a critical role in the globalists’ development of the New World Order system


This report examines the history of the leadership of the World Health Organization, and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.

 

 
 
 

 

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review


EDITOR'S NOTE:  This article was originally published on the OralHealthGroup.com web site in 2016.  Because COVID-19 has become a political weapon, the article has been removed because it interferes with the current FALSE NARRATIVE being shoved down everyone's throats about how effective masks are.  Now, instead of the article they have this breif statement posted to explain the removal:

If you are looking for “Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review” by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, it has been removed. The content was published in 2016 and is no longer relevant in our current climate.

Note that they don't say that the article is inaccurate in any way.  The issue is obviously "the current POLITICAL climate."

 


Conclusion of Studies
The primary reason for mandating the wearing of face masks is to protect dental personnel from airborne pathogens. This review has established that face masks are incapable of providing such a level of protection. Unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, national and provincial dental associations and regulatory agencies publically admit this fact, they will be guilty of perpetuating a myth that will be a disservice to the dental profession and its patients. It would be beneficial if, as a consequence of the review, all present infection control recommendations were subjected to the same rigorous testing as any new clinical intervention. Professional associations and governing bodies must ensure the clinical efficacy of quality improvement procedures prior to them being mandated.

 

by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC


Yesterday’s Scientific Dogma is Today’s Discarded Fable


Introduction
The above quotation is ascribed to Justice Archie Campbell author of Canada’s SARS Commission Final Report. 1 It is a stark reminder that scientific knowledge is constantly changing as new discoveries contradict established beliefs. For at least three decades a face mask has been deemed an essential component of the personal protective equipment worn by dental personnel. A current article, “Face Mask Performance: Are You Protected” gives the impression that masks are capable of providing an acceptable level of protection from airborne pathogens. 2 Studies of recent diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and the Ebola Crisis combined with those of seasonal influenza and drug resistant tuberculosis have promoted a better understanding of how respiratory diseases are transmitted. Concurrently, with this appreciation, there have been a number of clinical investigations into the efficacy of protective devices such as face masks. This article will describe how the findings of such studies lead to a rethinking of the benefits of wearing a mask during the practice of dentistry. It will begin by describing new concepts relating to infection control especially personal protective equipment (PPE).
 

Trends in Infection Control
For the past three decades there has been minimal opposition to what have become seemingly established and accepted infection control recommendations. In 2009, infection control specialist Dr. D. Diekema questioned the validity of these by asking what actual, front-line hospital-based infection control experiences were available to such authoritative organization as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 3 In the same year, while commenting on guidelines for face masks, Dr. M. Rupp of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America noted that some of the practices relating to infection control that have been in place for decades, ”haven’t been subjected to the same strenuous investigation that, for instance, a new medicine might be subjected.” 4 He opined that perhaps it is the relative cheapness and apparent safety of face masks that has prevented them from undergoing the extensive studies that should be required for any quality improvement device. 4 More recently, Dr. R. MacIntyre, a prolific investigator of face masks, has forcefully stated that the historical reliance on theoretical assumptions for recommending PPEs should be replaced by rigorously acquired clinical data. 5 She noted that most studies on face masks have been based on laboratory simulated tests which quite simply have limited clinical applicability as they cannot account for such human factors as compliance, coughing and talking. 5

Covering the nose and mouth for infection control started in the early 1900s when the German physician Carl Flugge discovered that exhaled droplets could transmit tuberculosis. 4 The science regarding the aerosol transmission of infectious diseases has, for years, been based on what is now appreciated to be “very outmoded research and an overly simplistic interpretation of the data.” 6 Modern studies are employing sensitive instruments and interpretative techniques to better understand the size and distribution of potentially infectious aerosol particles. 6 Such knowledge is paramount to appreciating the limitations of face masks. Nevertheless, it is the historical understanding of droplet and airborne transmission that has driven the longstanding and continuing tradition of mask wearing among health professionals. In 2014, the nursing profession was implored to “stop using practice interventions that are based on tradition” but instead adopt protocols that are based on critical evaluations of the available evidence. 7

A December 2015 article in the National Post seems to ascribe to Dr. Gardam, Director of Infection Prevention and Control, Toronto University Health Network the quote, “I need to choose which stupid, arbitrary infection control rules I’m going to push.” 8 In a communication with the author, Dr. Gardam explained that this was not a personal belief but that it did reflect the views of some infection control practitioners. In her 2014 article, “Germs and the Pseudoscience of Quality Improvement”, Dr. K Sibert, an anaesthetist with an interest in infection control, is of the opinion that many infection control rules are indeed arbitrary, not justified by the available evidence or subjected to controlled follow-up studies, but are devised, often under pressure, to give the appearance of doing something. 9

The above illustrate the developing concerns that many infection control measures have been adopted with minimal supporting evidence. To address this fault, the authors of a 2007 New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) article eloquently argue that all safety and quality improvement recommendations must be subjected to the same rigorous testing as would any new clinical intervention. 10 Dr. R. MacIntyre, a proponent of this trend in infection control, has used her research findings to boldly state that, “it would not seem justifiable to ask healthcare workers to wear surgical masks.” 4 To understand this conclusion it is necessary to appreciate the current concepts relating to airborne transmissions.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Ohio Stands Up!


BREAKING NEWS!

Ohio Stands Up! will be able to enter into the discovery stage of the trial soon and looks forward to deposing under oath the relevant state and federal officials.

"As the state continues to double down on this continued fraud, going so far as to create FEMA “concentration camps,” we are working to shine the light of truth on the dark reality of the COVID response.”

9/10/2020, Toledo, OH – As the state of Ohio continues to discriminate against the elderly and promote fear amongst the population, Ohio Stands Up! is making progress in shining the light of justice on the issue. Recent days have seen some of the most incredible steps yet taken in Ohio’s response to a disease that is only slightly more dangerous to most people than a seasonal influenza. Pursuant to D.O.-Non-Congregate-Shelter-Second-Amended-08.31.20 the state is creating FEMA “prison camps” to place people that are “unable to self-isolate” and showing symptoms of COVID-19.

Ohio Stands Up! attorney, Thomas Renz, said, “In working with our doctors and other experts we have become particularly troubled by this order. The symptoms of COVID-19 are the same or similar to a common cold, allergies, influenza, and even the side effects of some common medications. Since the test is inaccurate, even when used on the governor, how will we know who to imprison, and how will this imprisonment impact these people?”

Attorney Robert Gargasz asked, “Isn’t this similar to what Governor Cuomo did in nursing homes in New York, putting potentially sick and healthy people together in the same settings? Are we poisoning the healthy?” He goes on to ask, “With new reports that deaths are now below pre-pandemic levels, how can these actions be justified?”

Governor DeWine noted recently that the state would be eligible for additional funds for undertaking this project. This seems to indicate that the State makes money for imprisoning people without trial.

Ohio Stands Up! is happy, however, to announce that it appears we will be able to enter into the discovery stage of the trial soon. Attorney Renz stated, “Discovery is a critical part of this trial. The State has consistently told us that there is a public health crisis but refused to share their basis for this assertion. As we proceed through discovery the State will no longer be able to hide their data and models. We will finally be able to see the truth and determine just how dangerous this ‘crisis’ really is. We look forward to deposing the relevant state and federal officials and seeing what they have to say under oath.”

For more information, visit www.ohiostandsup.org.

 

MISSION: Our mission at Ohio Stands Up! is to file the first federal lawsuit in the country challenging a governor’s entire State of Emergency so we can reclaim Ohio. Our lawsuit will set national precedent, and as the saying goes, “Where Ohio goes so goes the nation.” Equally important are our efforts to educate Ohioans and all Americans on the reality of COVID-19 while ensuring our Constitutional rights are honored in the process.

WHO WE ARE: We are a group of 5,000 (and growing) concerned freedom-loving Ohioans, who recognize the tremendous sacrifices made by countless generations of Americans throughout our nation's history to secure, preserve, and protect our God-given rights. We believe it is our duty and privilege to protect our fundamental liberties while demanding our elected leaders be held accountable and be shown they cannot act with impunity for their tyrannical and corrupt behavior. We are united in our common goal to stand against continued violations of our Constitutional freedoms, while working to restore those freedoms from which we have been deprived. Leading Ohio Stands Up! is our all-volunteer Board comprised of 10 courageous Ohioans from all walks of life and careers. The Board is responsible for making all legal and financial decisions and leading this new movement.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Mask Fanatics Have Officially Abandoned Science To Control Your Life


By Georgi Boorman
TheFederalist.com
 

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is now requiring people to wear masks while playing sports. 'Experts' say that’s dangerous, but mask fanatics apparently know better than those they revered just months ago.

It’s nothing new for political religions to produce radicals that develop their own sects or cults. This time around, rigid devotion to enforcing mask compliance has produced runaway fanaticism based on nothing but blind faith that more mask-wearing is always better. Even the public health experts, whom these followers all promoted as great prophets just months ago, can’t tame their fervor.

That’s a problem, because a return to normalcy will require subduing radical factions that agitate for oppression. Restrictions such as mask mandates are like oxygen to followers of radical fundamentalist Covidianism — the abiding belief that only lockdowns, social distancing, and masks can deliver us from the deadly pandemic. The longer mandates stay in place and experts continue promoting mask use — “My mask protects you! Your mask protects me!” — the stronger and more widespread the extremism will grow, and the less influence experts will have over their behavior.

The evidence is abundant, but consider these three cases of radical Covidianism and how they trace back to an abandonment of the scientific standards necessary to maintain public health and a functioning society.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dr. Scott Atlas Disputes COVID-19 Fear Mongering Tactics From Our Health Officials


As coronavirus cases continue to increase across the United States, health officials and Democrat politicians seem to be using that statistic to fear monger and justify closure orders.

Dr. Scott Atlas of the Hoover Institute, discussed why we don’t need to be scared of the increase spread of coronavirus on Good Morning San Diego with KUSI’s Paul Rudy.

Atlas said that he has done more than a superficial analysis of the numbers, and after analyzing them, he doesn’t get scared.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
Please Support Us With A Purchase








Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Worthy of Support











Help Us Go Viral!


We no longer have the
luxury of time.




Who's Online
Guest Users: 490

Stats
8708 Pages Viewed
1036 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase