Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 574

Stats
3316 Pages Viewed
889 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • Viruses/Pandemics/COVID-19

Hospital Data And Care Cannot Be Trusted


by Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn
TheBlueStateConservative.com

By now almost everyone has heard about terrible conditions in hospitals as they face very high levels of COVID patients at the same time that they likely have lost staff because despite being fully vaccinated, they have COVID and are not working.  Just proving that vaccines and booster shots do not work to prevent infection and its transmission.

How trustworthy is all this bad news?
 

Number of COVID patients and deaths

There are two issues to consider:  First, let us consider the number of COVID patients that hospitals say they are dealing with and, not so incidentally, making lots of money from.

There is now a large fraction of hospital patients being classed as COVID that are better seen as incidental COVID cases.  This means that they come into hospitals for a host of ordinary reasons; they are tested for COVID.  Even though most may be asymptomatic they test positive.  Hospitals then treat these as COVID patients in every respect.  This greatly burdens hospitals.  Their eventual outcomes depend on how treatment for the main reason they got admitted are successful.  Remember that omicron, now the dominant form of COVID, for the vast majority of people does not produce serious health problems.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

New Harvard, Yale & Stanford Data Show 4 Out of 5 Americans Have Covid ‘Natural Immunity’


 

by Kyle Becker

In the United States, the media barely mention Covid prior infections or the existence of natural immunity.

But a CDC-sponsored database in partnership with Yale, Harvard, and Stanford universities shows that the overwhelming majority of Americans have natural immunity from prior infections, Becker News can exclusively report.

The covidestim database is supported by a cooperative agreement with the CDC and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Senator Ron Johnson Panel - COVID-19: A Second Opinion


Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world-renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.  Get ready for some eye-opening and HEARTBREAKING testimony by a host of highly respected expert witnesses.  This is a long 5-hour hearing but it's well worth the effort to listen to the whole thing.

For some reason, they recorded about 40 minutes of wait-time.
The meeting begins at 40:20 into the video.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

100 Questions They Don't Want To Answer


The most troubling part of the pandemic to me is the lack of transparency and accountability. The authorities love to create mandates we must follow, but they refuse to be held accountable.

 

By Steve Kirsch
SteverKirsch.substack.com
 

Here’s a list of questions that you can ask your doctor, local, state, and federal lawmakers and health authorities. I haven’t had any luck getting any of these questions answered on camera so I can share the answers with you. Perhaps you will have better luck.

There aren’t 100 questions here yet, but there will be when I’m done with this. Check back in a few days for the update.

IMPORTANT: Hyperlinks will be added later to all the references, but most things are available in Incriminating Evidence.


General questions

  1. Incriminating Evidence is a collection of counter-narrative evidence. Can we go through that one piece at a time and can you explain how these are all wrong? Or conversely, perhaps you can find just one document that you can show is wrong in that article?


Censorship

  1. President Biden has a Disinformation Dozen list. Why not debate these people instead of censoring them? Is it right for the leader of the free world to proudly proclaim a censorship list?

  2. Facebook has removed vaccine victim support groups with over 200,000 users. Why was this done? Why didn’t the medical community say a word in protest? How is removing a support group for vaccine injured a benefit to society?

  3. Will you sponsor a law allowing people who have had live saving content removed from large social media platforms to sue for statutory damages?

  4. Why hasn’t the mainstream medical community come out to denounce censorship attempts by a rogue set of 270 “doctors”?

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Dr. Meryl Nass Explains the Hideous ‘Bait-and-Switch’ Used to Protect Big Pharma While Conning People Into Getting Jabbed


STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • January 11, 2022, the Health and Human Services Committee of the Maine legislature held a public hearing on LD867 “An Act to Prohibit Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations for 5 Years to Allow for Safety Testing and Investigations Into Reproductive Harm”
  • Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist with a special interest in vaccine-induced illnesses and expertise in anthrax and bioterrorism, testified in favor of the bill
  • All currently available COVID shots in the U.S. are experimental. None is licensed. Comirnaty, which has received full license, is not available in the U.S., and won’t be made available as long as doses of the Emergency Use Authorized Pfizer shot, BNT162b2, remain
  • Since the COVID shots are experimental, U.S. law requires potential recipients to have the right to refuse. Experimental drugs also cannot be mandated, and potential recipients must give written informed consent. Informed consent cannot be given when reports of side effects are censored and not disclosed
  • Some foundational safety studies are just now starting and won’t be completed until 2027

January 11, 2022, the Health and Human Services Committee of the Maine legislature held a public hearing on LD8671 “An Act to Prohibit Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations for 5 Years to Allow for Safety Testing and Investigations Into Reproductive Harm.”

The American Cancer Society is vehemently opposed to this rational bill.2 In some twisted, incomprehensible logic, the ACS claims that banning mandatory COVID jabs would “place the health of cancer patients at greater risk.” How, one might ask, could that happen, considering the jabbed are just as likely to contract and spread the virus?

Getting the shot in no way, shape or form protects anyone around you. So, what could it be? One can only wonder if the ACS’ opposition has anything to do with their “long-standing partnership”3 with vaccine maker Pfizer, which in 2020 alone helped the ACS hand out $3.7 million in grants4 — but which also happens to produce one of the COVID mRNA injections?

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Arizona Plan Would Make Employers LIABLE for Complications From Covid Shot


 
 

COVID-19 and its variations undoubtedly are a dangerous threat to the health of a nation’s population, and hundreds of thousands have died of it in America since it apparently came out of a Chinese research lab two years ago.

But also significant are the nearly 600,000 “incidents” that have been reported to the nation’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, identified in a report from Western Journal.

Those include skin problems, neuropathy and numbness, headaches, heart problems, respiratory ailments, blood clots and memory problems, among many more, including death. And they’ve come after someone has gotten a COVID-19 shot.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Croatian MP Confronts Macron Over His Vaccine Mandate Being a ‘Death Penalty’


Croatian MEP Mislav Kolakušić directly confronted French President Emmanuel Macron during an EU Parliament summit, likening his draconian vaccine mandate to the death penalty.

“President Macron, considering many restrictions of citizens’ rights and freedoms in France during the pandemic, I ask of you only one thing,” Kolakušić told a masked Macron on Wednesday.

“While presiding over the EU, do everything exactly the opposite of what you were doing in France.”

Kolakušić then argued that Macron’s vaccine mandate is no different than the “death penalty”, citing the “tens of thousands” who died from the injection.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

A Partial List of the Myriad Abuses That Face Masks Inflict on Our Children


By

I had not originally intended to write a follow up article to detail the harms masks do to kids in a similar fashion to the prior article Facemasks Are Not an ‘Inconvenience’, Facemasks Are Not Trivial, because I thought that the subject had been addressed by plenty of other people, many of whom are credentialed psychologists or psychiatrists (with real expertise). However, I received a ton of feedback by a variety of people requesting an article about the harms of masking to children in the same style, so here goes.


I’m going to skip an intro, as pretty much everyone is well versed in the foundational morality that children are uniquely vulnerable and dependent upon adults, especially their parents, and that we therefore have a unique moral responsibility towards children. The (formerly?) panoptically shared intuitive repugnance of child abuse is a testament to this.
 

Some Basic Child Psychology

So here are a few basic bullet points about children, some of which might seem a bit counterintuitive or at least not the type of thing you would see or hear frequently:

  • Kids, especially younger kids who are untainted by the messiness of life, are like little human lie detectors, and even though they usually lack the comprehension or sophistication to articulate it even to themselves, they absolutely pick up when something untoward is going on.
  • Kids when confronted by a unavoidable contradiction or dissonance will typically resolve it by internalizing that they are to blame in some way.
  • Kids assume that however they experience life (especially in their initial formative years when they first start to build a repertoire of detailed memories) is representative of how life is “supposed to be”.
  • Kids are not resilient in the sense that they can shake off considerable emotional trauma or abuse
  • Kids are very resilient in the sense that they can internalize emotional distress and trauma as “normal”, and suppress their natural instincts and feelings that impede functioning “normally” in this unnatural emotional state.
  • Good parenting is critical and can blunt the negative impacts tremendously. Conversely, bad parenting can be just as powerful as a damaging force.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: You Can Check Into Hospitals, but You Can Never Leave


Story at-a-glance

  • Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet from Truth for Health Foundation lays bare what's been happening inside America's hospital system over the last two years, bringing to mind the 1977 dystopian Eagles’ hit song, “Hotel California,” where people can check in, but they can never leave
  • Where once people could sign out of the hospital against medical advice (AMA), the Foundation's COVID Care Strategy Team has sometimes needed a show of force from police, attorneys, media and family members to liberate patients from a hospital
  • Hospitals have good reason to want to keep patients from leaving since the government has incentivized them to keep you there and watch you die, paying bonuses for every patient tested, admitted or treated with remdesivir for COVID, for every COVID patient on a ventilator and every COVID death
  • Human rights attorney Thomas Renz estimates each of these bonuses can potentially add up to $100,000 extra per COVID patient; this may be one more reason why hospitals are not administering safe and effective medications like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine
  • Vliet cautions people not to get overwhelmed by fear, and instead take action; get prepared with a COVID survival kit and make an action plan if you must be admitted to the hospital

In this 40-minute interview with Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, she reveals to host Dr. Peter R. Breggin many of the atrocities that are happening in hospitals today — not in the name of science, research or misguided intervention, but in the name of worship of the almighty dollar.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

One of the World’s Oldest and Most Respected Medical Journals Just Called Out Covid “Vaccine” and Treatment Shenanigans


By JD Ruker
Uncancelled.news

The BMJ, formerly known as the British Medical Journal, has a history of being more than just a respected peer-reviewed scientific publication. Throughout its 180+ year history, it has acted as a watchdog to protect the public interest from nefarious forces in and out of government who manipulate health sciences and research for their own benefit. Today, they released an editorial slamming the powers-that-be over their handling of Covid-19 vaccines and treatments.

In an article titled, “Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now,” the journal called foul on the lack of transparency behind Big Pharma’s push to jab every man, woman, and child on earth. Penned by Peter Doshi, senior editor, Fiona Godlee, former editor in chief, and Kamran Abbasi, editor in chief, the article points out how lack of transparency in the recent past brought a heavy toll to the people. They called out how there is even less transparency with Covid-19 vaccines and treatments than in past instances that proved to be deadly.

We are publishing their entire editorial here to help spread the word. As a trade publication, this article has the potential to reach those in the industry but it isn’t common practice for the public to peruse such publications in their spare time. This particular article is far too important to leave for those who practice medicine. It dives into the ethics of what has been happening with Covid-19. More importantly, it notes that actions being taken by governments across the world, including the United States, do not align with sound medicine.

Without flat out saying it, one can easily see in the editorial the implications that Big Pharma is driving the actions of governments based on profits alone, not the best interests of the people. This is something that has been asserted in many non-medical publications, including ours, but to see it written in a peer-reviewed opinion from a highly respected medical journal is astounding. This is a bombshell, and the world needs to read it.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
Please Support Us With A Purchase








Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Worthy of Support














Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Guest Users: 574

Stats
3316 Pages Viewed
889 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase