Video: Germans Being Mass Brainwashed by TV to Submit to Islam

Nationwide re-education program indoctrinates public to surrender their culture


Germans are being mass brainwashed by television to surrender their culture and submit to Islam.  This is what capitulation looks like.

 

 
 

This is what’s being shown on German State TV.

Germany is running out of time. pic.twitter.com/LQlXTNerNZ

 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Faith Goldy - Immigrant Master Race?


Editor's Note:  Faith Goldy is really great.  She makes you think.  In this piece she discusses immigrations issues that are rarely talked about, government policies that end up creating a whole new set of problems in attempts to solve other perceived problems.
~~~~~~~~~


Is an immigrant overclass coming to America?

Certain groups have a higher mean IQ than European Americans. And so, without discriminatory quotas in place (like the ones that are now being investigated by President Trump's DOJ), these groups will be over represented as a percentage of the population in postsecondary institutions and associated workplaces that follow.

Will the passage of the RAISE Act exaggerate and accelerate those trends?

Visit VDARE.com for more on this topic!

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Supreme Court Allows Full Enforcement of Trump Travel Ban


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to fully enforce a ban on travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries.

This is not a final ruling on the travel ban: Challenges to the policy are winding through the federal courts, and the justices themselves ultimately are expected to rule on its legality.

But the action indicates that the high court might eventually approve the latest version of the ban, announced by President Donald Trump in September. Lower courts have continued to find problems with the policy.

Opponents of this and previous versions of the ban say they show a bias against Muslims. They say that was reinforced most recently by Trump’s retweets of anti-Muslim videos.

“President Trump’s anti-Muslim prejudice is no secret. He has repeatedly confirmed it, including just last week on Twitter. It’s unfortunate that the full ban can move forward for now, but this order does not address the merits of our claims,” said Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. The ACLU is representing some opponents of the ban.

Just two justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, noted their disagreement with court orders allowing the latest policy to take full effect.

The new policy is not expected to cause the chaos that ensued at airports when Trump rolled out his first ban without warning in January.

The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Lower courts had said people from those nations with a claim of a “bona fide” relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.

The courts were borrowing language the Supreme Court itself came up with last summer to allow partial enforcement of an earlier version of the ban.

Now, those relationships will no longer provide a blanket exemption from the ban, although visa officials can make exceptions on a case-by-case basis.

The justices offered no explanation for their order, but the administration had said that blocking the full ban was causing “irreparable harm” because the policy is based on legitimate national security and foreign policy concerns.

In lawsuits filed in Hawaii and Maryland, federal courts said the updated travel ban violated federal immigration law. The travel policy also applies to travelers from North Korea and to some Venezuelan government officials and their families, but the lawsuits did not challenge those restrictions. Also unaffected are refugees. A temporary ban on refugees expired in October.

All the rulings so far have been on a preliminary basis. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, will be holding arguments on the legality of the ban this week.

David Levine, a University of California Hastings law school professor, said that by allowing the ban to take effect just days before the appeals court arguments, the justices were signaling their view.

“I think it’s tipping the hand of the Supreme Court,” Levine said. “It suggests that from their understanding, the government is more likely to prevail on the merits than we might have thought.”

Both appeals courts are dealing with the issue on an accelerated basis, and the Supreme Court noted it expects those courts to reach decisions “with appropriate dispatch.”

Quick resolution by appellate courts would allow the Supreme Court to hear and decide the issue this term, by the end of June.

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Why Muslims Cannot Assimilate Into Canada, America, Europe & Western Countries


By Frosty Wooldridge
Rense.com
 

Voltaire on Islam

“The Quran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine. It talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that Muhammad, a camel trader, sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith; now this is certainly something that no one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him.” Voltaire 1694-1788

With worldwide Moslem terror events becoming regular front-page news, leaders of Western countries might ask themselves why they promote Moslem immigration.

Where Islam gains a foothold in any host country, conflict ensues at the local level until it boils over onto the national stage. While Moslems lay low in the beginning stages of their “hijrah” (‘seeding’ as advocated by the Quran to spread Islam) of host countries, as their numbers grow, they push for Sharia Law.

Already in the United Kingdom after 25 years of intense Moslem immigration, Islam features 3,000 mosques, 130 Sharia courts, 50 Muslim Sharia Councils and dozens of ‘no go zones’ where Moslem ‘Sharia’ patrols ensure no one disobeys Sharia Law.
Main rules of Sharia Law: Islamic law opposes free speech, women’s rights and religious choice. It advocates honor killings, female genital mutilation, four wives per husband, women as property of men, arranged marriages, wife beating, decapitation, and Islam supreme over all other religions.

Unfortunately, Islamic law diametrically contradicts Constitutional-democratic-republican law in every way.

Today in Canada, America and Europe—Moslems dictate the rules with millions of followers creating parallel societies inside of Western countries. Once they arrive, no one understands why they fail to leave their barbaric rituals and become modernized.

I spoke with fellow research journalist Peter Goodchild on his understanding of Moslems in Western countries. Could you give us an idea as to how and why Moslems cannot and do not assimilate into Western countries?

“The Muslim world-view differs greatly from that of the Westerner,” said Goodchild. “Largely because Muslims are tribalist. There are many forms of Islamic culture, and tribalism is very much an Arabic characteristic, but it is common throughout the Muslim world. Muslim tribalism is also similar to that of native people in the Americas, or in Africa. Allegiance is to the tribe, not to a “country.” Arabic countries did not even exist until such political entities were forced upon them in the 20th century by the British and the Americans. The essence of tribalism is that a man’s (and secondarily a woman’s) loyalty is to the tribe. (Even in my Omani classrooms in 2008-11, if there was a student in a class who was not in the same tribe as the other students, then there could be trouble.) Muslims have two names, just as Westerners do, but the big difference is that a Westerner’s last name is a family name, whereas a Muslim’s last name is that of a tribe.

“Because a Muslim belongs to a tribe, he is raised from birth to regard people outside his own tribe as enemies. Because other people are enemies, it is senseless to speak of a “crime” against them. For example, killing someone from another tribe is not “murder.” “Lawrence of Arabia” fell into this problem when he was trying to unite the Arabs and get them to side with the British against the Turks in WWI.

“The issue of tribalism came up — with apparently little awareness on the part of Westerners — in the last few years, when large numbers of Muslim migrants poured into Europe. Westerners were appalled by the “crimes” being committed. But from a Muslim perspective these were not crimes at all. And from a Muslim perspective, Westerners are basically subhuman because they have no tribes. Because they have no tribes it is senseless to say that a Muslim is committing a “crime” against such people.

“Again as in the Americas or in Africa, a member of a tribal society regards his women as his property. The more women the better! To a tribalist, a law enforcing monogamy is senseless. Why should a man be deprived of a chance to increase his women or his donkeys or camels? And why should a man have to accord a woman the same rights as a man?

“One can go beyond the above, and consider religion. Muslims commonly say that Allah appeared first to Moses, secondly to Jesus, and thirdly to Muhammad. Westerners understand only the first two stages and are therefore doomed by Allah. A Muslim feels no compassion for a Westerner, since the latter has not only no tribe, but no real religion

“What people such as Justin Trudeau, [Merkel, Macron, Trump, Theresa May, et al.] are doing is getting themselves elected as overlords of the Muslim tribes. The political unit is geographically somewhat larger than the Muslims are used to, but the concept of the Westerner as a subhuman pre-tribal enemy is already well in place.

“Westerners often use simple emotion-laden language, based almost entirely on Western assumptions about morality, to criticize Muslims for their “crimes,” or to criticize people such as Trudeau or [Trump] for helping Muslims. But to do so is to display the Westerner’s misunderstanding of the Muslim world-view. We can be appalled at tribal mentality, but it goes back thousands of years and should not be dismissed as merely some unfortunate aberration. In any case, without an understanding of that world-view, any moral objections are certainly simplistic — and somewhat misplaced. To deal with Islam one must first understand it.

“The above comments about Muslim tribalism are relevant to patterns of immigration in Canada, [America and Europe], but they are especially relevant to what can be called psychological warfare, “PSYOP” — warfare carried out by psychological devices rather than conventional weapons. Such warfare is often used by governments against their own citizens. Trudeau and his colleagues are experts at psychological warfare.

“Canadian leader Justin Trudeau is using Muslims, people who do not understand Western values, and would have no interest in such values even if they did understand them, as a means of asserting control over his own compatriots, Canadians — Westerners. In that sense, Trudeau is betraying his country.”

“Immigrants devoted to their own cultures and religions are not influenced by the secular politically correct façade that dominates academia, news-media, entertainment, education, religious and political thinking today,” said James Walsh, former Associate General Counsel of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. “They claim the right not to assimilate, and the day is coming when the question will be how can the United States regulate the defiantly unassimilated cultures, religions and mores of foreign lands?  Such immigrants say their traditions trump the U.S. legal system.  Balkanization of the United States has begun.”  Speech given by James Walsh in 1991

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

George Soros Letter Reveals Globalist Plan To Destroy the First World

By eliminating national borders with global migrant blitzkreig invasions


 



As the Left continues to lose the battle for America's soul, its greatest champions are going full-out in an attempt to turn the tide any way they can – even if it means destroying the country.

One of the vilest among them is billionaire George Soros, a Hungarian-born U.S. citizen who now seeks to demolish the country that gave him his riches along with its allies.

As reported by Breitbart London, Soros recently publicly confirmed that, yes, he seeks to essentially wipe out all European borders following an accusation made last week by the prime mister of his birth country, Viktor Orban (who, unlike Soros, actually has to deal with the tens of thousands of second- and third-world migrants streaming into his country and other European nations – while Soros lives free of such inconveniences in his $10 million mansion/castle outside of New York City).

In recent days, Orban has accused Soros of deliberately encouraging the migrant crisis now engulfing the continent.

"This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other by those (human rights) activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state," Orban said. "This Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George Soros."

 

 

'Let's take down all borders'

Following Orban's statement, Soros sent an email to Bloomberg Business, in which he claimed that his foundations actually help "uphold European values," while Orban's actions in bolstering the Hungarian border and thus impeding a huge influx of migrants "undermine those values."

"His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle," Soros added. "Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle."

 

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

President Trump Signs Executive Order Temporarily Halting All Refugees


Breitbart

President Trump signed an executive order late Friday which temporarily bars refugees from entering the United States.

Trump signed the order on refugees while at the Pentagon, minutes after General James Mattis was sworn in as Secretary of Defense by Vice President Mike Pence at a brief ceremony which the president attended.

The executive order, “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals,” contained these key elements:

  • Suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for 120 days, prohibiting the arrival of refugees into the United States from any country during that period
  • Ordered the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to undertake a complete review of the refugee vetting process
  • Permanently banned Syrian refugees until President Trump determined otherwise, and
  • Lowered the ceiling of refugees allowed to enter the United States during FY 2017 to 50,000.

Opponents of the federal refugee resettlement program praised Trump’s actions. “This is a great beginning, and much needed,” Ann Corcoran of Refugee Resettlement Watch told Breitbart News.

During the 12 months up to September 30, 2016, the federal government accepted 84,995 refugees in the United States.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)