By Steve Watson
Infowars.com

CNN continued its wall to wall vaccine pushing coverage with yet another medical “expert” suggesting that in order to force more people to get vaccinated life should be made as difficult as possible for those who are still opting not to take the shots.

Dr. Leana Wen, who formerly headed Planned Parenthood, suggested that Americans should be banned from engaging in social events and forced to undergo PCR tests twice a week if they want to stay unvaccinated.

“It needs to be hard for people to remain unvaccinated,” Wen stated, lamenting “Right now, it’s kind of the opposite.”

“But at some point these mandates, by workplaces, by schools, I think it will be important to say, ‘Hey, you can opt out, but if you want to opt out, you have to sign these forms, you have to get twice-weekly testing,’” Wen emphasised.

Wen made her opinion clear, concluding “Basically, we need to make getting vaccinated the easy choice.”

Later in the broadcast, mandatory vaccinations were once again advocated by talking heads.

Watch:

Story at-a-glance

• Perhaps one of the greatest crimes in this whole pandemic is the refusal by reigning health authorities to issue early treatment guidance. Instead, they’ve done everything possible to suppress remedies shown to work, whether it be corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with zinc, ivermectin, vitamin D or NAC
• According to Dr. Peter McCullough, 85% of COVID deaths could have been prevented had early treatment protocols been widely implemented rather than censored
• It appears the intense censoring and suppression of early treatments was a strategy to promote as much fear, suffering, hospitalization and death as possible in order to prepare the population to accept a new genre of gene transfer technologies on a mass scale
• The overwhelming drive to get a “needle in every arm” is such that health authorities are not even acknowledging the fact that those who have recovered from COVID-19 and many groups have no possibility of benefiting from the vaccine, including younger individuals, pregnant women, women of childbearing potential, and those with immunodeficiencies
• Despite FDA warnings for myocarditis with Pfizer and Moderna and cavernous venous thrombosis with Johnson & Johnson, the vaccine cabal keeps propaganda on full blast

In this interview, Dr. Peter McCullough discusses the importance of early treatment for COVID-19, and the potential motivations behind the suppression of safe and effective treatments.

McCullough has impeccable academic credentials. He’s an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master’s degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States and is the editor of two medical journals.

By Daniel Horowitz
TheBlaze.com

We've spent over a year debating nonexistent evidence that masks effectively protect against the spread of viruses. However, there has been little debate and few published studies on potential harms of mask-wearing, a reality that has allowed zealous maskers to aggressively push their mandate as harmless, with no downside. Well, now we have a randomized controlled trial published in JAMA that raises serious concerns about this practice.

Researchers from Germany conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial of 45 children wearing masks and measured the baseline carbon dioxide levels during inhalation and exhalation behind various masks as compared to the levels of unmasked children. The results are very concerning:

We measured means (SDs) between 13 120 (384) and 13 910 (374) ppm of carbon dioxide in inhaled air under surgical and filtering facepiece 2 (FFP2) masks, which is higher than what is already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Office by a factor of 6. This was a value reached after 3 minutes of measurement. Children under normal conditions in schools wear such masks for a mean of 270 (interquartile range, 120-390) minutes. The Figure shows that the value of the child with the lowest carbon dioxide level was 3-fold greater than the limit of 0.2 % by volume. The youngest children had the highest values, with one 7-year-old child's carbon dioxide level measured at 25 000 ppm. (Emphasis added.)

Why has nobody in our government bothered to study this before experimenting on children for a virus that doesn't affect them?

 

SolariReport.com

These forms were written by Corey Lynn of Corey’s Digs for The Solari Report.

Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections

This puts employers in a box. This is a form every employee who is faced with this needs to submit to the authorized officer of their company. It is 100% legally accurate, forces them to respond to your questions (already on the form for you), provide you with all requirements by the FDA, makes them review all of the ways they are breaking the law, and holds them 100% financially responsible, requiring a signature.

Link to the form

Read the complete disclosure here

Form for Students Attending Colleges or Universities Requiring Covid-19 Injections

This puts colleges in a box. This is a form every student who is faced with this needs to submit to the authorized officer of their school. It is 100% legally accurate, forces them to respond to your questions (already on the form for you), provide you with all requirements by the FDA, makes them review all of the ways they are breaking the law, and holds them 100% financially responsible, requiring a signature.

Link to the form

Read the complete disclosure here.

Please share both the Student and Employee forms with friends, family, co-workers, fellow students, and across social media—far and wide.

 

Related reading:

Letters from Children’s Health Defense: Notice for Employers, Universities and Other Institutions Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines

Letter from Frontline Doctors: Covid-19 Experimental Vaccine Candidates

NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANDATING COVID-19 TESTS

NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANDATING COVID-19 MASKS

NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONSMANDATING COVID-19 VACCINES

By Scott Morefield
TownHall.com

We've been told for well over a year that widespread forced public masking should be implemented because, even if only moderately to slightly to negligibly effective at curbing the spread of COVID-19, there are ZERO drawbacks.

"What's the harm?" they ask.

"It's only a minor inconvenience," they bleat.

"If it saves ONE LIFE, it's worth it!" they implore.

Meanwhile, we on Team Reality have not only continued to point to real-world data that shows masking to be entirely ineffective, we've also maintained that forced public masking, especially long-term, has negative societal and even health ramifications that the powers-that-be are all-too-happy to ignore in subservience to their newfound face mask god. 

It only stands to reason that one of those health ramifications would be the fact that millions of people, particularly children, have been forced to wear and carry around pieces of cloth they've continually breathed through for hours on end. What lurking pathogens might be found on these disgusting contraptions being incessantly handled, stuck in pockets, and mindlessly tossed on books, tables, and desks? Well, one group of Florida parents sent a batch of masks worn by their children to a lab to find out. And yeah, you'll probably need to make sure you aren't eating dinner anytime soon before you digest THESE results. 

 

Updated: 18 May 2021

Source: https://www.exstnc.com/

Scroll down for Directory below

INFORMATION ONLY - NOT GUARANTEED ACCURATE

NOT MEDICAL ADVICE - CONSULT A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL

(See TERMS below)

Heal COVID-19 … Early

Only your immune system can eliminate the coronavirus and related effects that causes COVID-19. Combinations of medications and supplements are used to slow down viral replication as well as provide immune enhancement and regulation until your body can get ahead of and survive long enough to clear the viral load and recover from the resulting damage that the virus initiates.  Earlier treatment is better. Outside of the body, soap and other sanitizers destroy the virus.

The general worldwide population will not have access to COVID-19 vaccines for several months. Even when available, the vaccines will not be 100% effective; people will continue to contract COVID-19 and require treatment. Currently available effective treatments (provided by the medical professionals listed in the directory below), therefore, will remain important to limit physical, emotional and economic suffering resulting from COVID-19

COVID-19 is largely a vascular disease that produces blood clotting. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus causes dysregulation of the body's immune response system resulting in the clotting.  The disease includes inflammation of the vascular tissue in the lungs, strokes, and issues in other parts of the body.

See treatment protocols for all phases of COVID-19 ... including post-COVID ("Long-haul") syndrome at:

         https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-–-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf

Ivermectin (IVM) ... and possibly Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus Zinc, if HCQ is provided very soon after beginning of diagnosis ... have proven effective for COVID-19 therapy. In addition, no adverse reactions (contraindications) are typical from simultaneous use of IVM and HCQ and other substances in the treatment protocols. Some doctors include both IVM and HCQ+Zinc in their treatments.

Based on clinical evidence, Ivermectin is the more effective primary treatment medication... for all phases of COVID-19.

IVM appears to inhibit viral replication, control immune system over-reaction, and minimize excessive blood clotting. Combining IVM with Fluvoxamine and other medications and supplements enhances the effectiveness.  https://c19early.com

 

The following MIT study was quietly released a few months back and the subject was on anti-maskers themselves, as people, saying they are not “science deniers”, instead, they actually value critical thinking more than the “trust the science” crowd. But the researchers offer a twist which they themselves are guilty of.

It seems the key difference isn’t whether ‘anti-maskers’ have more data, are more educated, etc, – what makes ‘anti-maskers’ highly capable is their lack of “trust” in the system. There is also a lack of faith in public health officials who have either blatantly lied, or have been outrageously incorrect for decades. Many feel trust is earned, and the establishment has given people no reason to trust them and every reason not to.

From the findings:

“Most fundamentally, groups we studied believe that science is a process, not an institution.”

“Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data.”

“In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege personal research and direct reading over “expert” interpretations.”

“Its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand.”

“They are highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of scientific elites.”

“The lack of transparency within the data collection systems—which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty—erodes these users’ trust within both government institutions and the datasets they release.”

“their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.”

“data is the only way to set fear-bound politicians straight, and using better data is a surefire way towards creating a safer community.”

“Arguing anti-maskers need more scientific literacy is to characterize their approach as uninformed & inexplicably extreme. This study shows the opposite: they are deeply invested in forms of critique & knowledge production they recognize as markers of scientific expertise”

“We argue that anti-maskers’ deep story draws from similar wells of resentment, but adds a particular emphasis on the usurpation of scientific knowledge by a paternalistic, condescending elite that expects intellectual subservience rather than critical thinking from the public.”

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

A peer-reviewed study found that ivermectin can end the COVID pandemic. The medicine was found to “significantly reduces the risk of contracting the deadly respiratory disease when used regularly.”

Like hydroxychloroquine the drug is well known to doctors. It has been used as an antiparasitic.

The peer-reviewed study on its effectiveness was published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

And the good news is that ivermectin won’t kill you!

The The Weather Channel thought this was important enough to publish:

A peer-reviewed research has claimed that global ivermectin use can end the COVID-19 pandemic, as the medicine significantly reduces the risk of contracting the deadly respiratory disease when used regularly.

The common antiparasitic ivermectin is being touted as a miracle cure for COVID-19 by doctors and campaigners the world over.

Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three US government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies.

Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCT’s).

In a Highwire exclusive, Del sits down with three healthcare workers who were on the frontline of Covid vaccine rollouts in America. In a candid and emotional interview, the three women go back to the day they received their vaccine, the severe reactions they endured starting just days after, and the complete denial the medical community has towards the groundswell of injured people looking for help.

 

Powerful Video: Georgia Mother Says It’s Time To Take The Masks Off Our Children! Courtney Ann Taylor of Georgia recently delivered a powerful public message advocating an end to the mask requirement for school children. The video begins with Taylor saying if Gwinnett County Board of Education officials really believed in the social and emotional health of kids, they’d end the mask mandate immediately.