Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Editor
Guest Users: 668

Stats
7147 Pages Viewed
1287 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase






  • Home
  • Elections/Vote Fraud

Thousands of Georgia Ballots Seem To Be Photocopies of One Joe Biden Ballot- Dem Judge Orders Forensic Audit



 

RealClearInvestigations.com

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they'd been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.

In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine.

“All of them were strangely pristine," said Voyles, who said she’d never seen anything like it in her 20 years monitoring elections in Fulton County, which includes much of Atlanta.

She wasn’t alone. At least three other poll workers observed the same thing in stacks of absentee ballots for Biden processed by the county, and they have joined Voyles in swearing under penalty of perjury that they looked fake.

Now election watchdogs have used their affidavits to help convince a state judge to unseal all of the 147,000 mail-in ballots counted in Fulton and allow a closer inspection of the suspicious Biden ballots for evidence of counterfeiting. They argue that potentially tens of thousands may have been manufactured in a race that Biden won by just 12,000 votes thanks to a late surge of mail-in ballots counted after election monitors were shooed from State Farm Arena in Atlanta.

“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” said Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, one of the leading advocates for election integrity in the state.

He said the suspect ballots remain in the custody of the election officials and inaccessible from public view.

 “We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

He and other petitioners were ordered to meet at the warehouse May 28 to settle the terms of the inspection of the absentee ballots. But the day before the scheduled meeting, the county filed a flurry of motions to dismiss the case, delaying the inspection indefinitely.

“We will be in court on June 21 to resolve these motions,” said Favorito, calling them another “roadblock” the county has tried to throw in their way. He expects talks over the logistics of the inspection to resume after the Fourth of July holiday.

As part of his May 21 order, Superior Court Judge Brian Amero requested officials guard the warehouse around the clock until an inspection date can be set. But just eight days later, a breach in security was reported after sheriff’s deputies left their post for a couple of hours.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

IMPOSSIBLE: A Sample of 950 Military Ballots Were Recently Audited In Georgia and ALL Went for Joe Biden


By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

In Georgia in a sample of military ballots were reviewed recently and all went for Joe Biden.  There is no way these were legit.   

Yesterday John Fredricks was interviewed on the War Room with Steve Bannon.  There were many nuggets in Fredricks’ interview.  Another key item discussed involved military ballots.  Fredericks said that of 950 military mail-in ballots sampled in a recent review, 100% went to Biden.
 

We reported previously how the military ballots in Georgia and Michigan were nearly all mysteriously and impossibly for Joe Biden.  (This most likely occurred across the country.  This is what the Democrats think of our military.)

This is not possible.  These votes are clearly manipulated by the left. 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Georgia Judge Decides to Unseal Absentee Ballots in Fulton County for Review


Editor's Note: Remember the FRAUD caught on security cameras where workers are seen scanning the same ballots at least three times?  Well, FINALLY, we have a courageous judge who sees it for what it is and decided to do something about it.

 

By Zachary Stieber
TheEpochTimes.com

A judge in Georgia on Friday ruled to unseal absentee ballots submitted in the 2020 presidential election.

Petitioners in an ongoing case will be able to go to where the ballots are stored in Fulton County, Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero said at the conclusion of a hearing.

Amero plans to issue an order soon that will set forth protocols governing a fresh scanning of the ballots, which will be done by county workers while petitioners and their experts observe.

A group of voters filed a petition last year asking for a forensic inspection of mail-in ballots that were sent in for the 2020 election. The petition alleged an abnormal vote increase for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and an abnormal reduction in President Donald Trump’s tabulation, among other alleged abnormalities.

Amero allowed the petitioners in March access to scanned images of the ballots, but attorneys for the petitioners argued in court that the resolution, 200 dots per inch (DPI), was too low to perform proper analysis.

The petitioners asked for images at 600 DPI or higher, and access to the ballots themselves.

David Sawyer, a forensics expert, testified for the petitioners. He said he identified a discrepancy in the number of batches that were received by petitioners and the number that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office listed as having been examined in a risk-limiting audit.

He told the judge that direct access to ballots would be best “because that’s the original evidence, and that’s the best evidence.”

Lawyers for Fulton County and Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, a Republican, argued that letting the petitioners examine the ballots outside of the presence of county workers would violate federal law. They also said a “citizen audit” wasn’t provided for in state law. If the judge allowed such an audit, he should pick the auditing team or allow the parties to reach an agreement on which firms should do the audit, they added.

Amero assured them he was largely of the same mind.

“I have no inclination at all to release these ballots to anyone other than the clerk or the county,” he said.

But he pushed back on the notion that petitioners did not have the ability to get better scans of the ballots or visually inspect them.

“That seems to be something that they have the authority and the right to do,” he said.

“I have never seen in this case a motion to dismiss from anyone for any reason and in the absence of considering things in that way then this does take the form of a civil case where there is some discovery” under state law, he said.

The parties are scheduled to meet at the Fulton County ballot storage location on May 28.

Raffensperger told The Epoch Times via email: “From day one I have encouraged Georgians with concerns about the election in their counties to pursue those claims through legal avenues. Fulton County has a long standing history of election mismanagement that has understandably weakened voters’ faith in its system. Allowing this audit provides another layer of transparency and citizen engagement.”

Raffensperger, who asked the judge last month not to grant petitioners access to the physical ballots, will have a representative present next week.

Fulton County did not return an inquiry.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Windham, NH Audit Results Show Ample Evidence that Voting Machines Favored Democrats, Are Not Reliable and Cannot be Trusted


By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

Dr. David Strang M.D., is the Belknap County Republican Committee State Committee Member, with the New Hampshire GOP.

On Sunday Dr. Strang examined the latest results coming from the Windham, New Hampshire elections audit.  He was stunned with the results and wrote up an analysis out for The Gateway Pundit.

Dr. Strang told The Gateway Pundit that there were at least two other towns that had voting machines, similar to Machine #2 in Windham, that showed Democrat favoritism.  According to Dr. Strang these voting machines were always the machines that were fed the most ballots in these communities.  So this is a repetitive peculiarity that we are seeing.

Dr. Strang believes the state has a huge problem on its hands.  The totals from the Windham machines cannot be replicated.  Only the hand recounts are reliable.  And the machines are shorting Republicans in Windham at a greater rate than Democrat candidates.

Via Dr. Strang:

I have looked at the actual machine tapes from the audit and the numbers are WORSE than what Ken Eyring reported on his chart that you featured in this morning’s post.

Here is my take:

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Maricopa Audit Bombshell: Election Officials DID NOT Have Admin Control of Elections

This tells us the only ones who likely had admin control over the voting machines was Dominion Voting Systems.


By JD Ruker
AmericanConservativeMovement.com


Maricopa County election officials admitted to auditors today that they do not have possession of administrative passwords that grant full control over the voting machines used in the 2020 election. Those machines and ballots are currently being audited by a third party group hired by the state Senate to determine the degree of voter fraud that took place in November.

Steve Bannon and John Solomon reported on War Room today that Maricopa County officials do not have the administrative passwords for the voting machine. Whether they’re lying or not, this is bad. If they’re lying, that means they know something funny was done to the machines and vote totals that can be discovered if they hand over the administrative passwords. If they are telling the truth, then they really had no control over the election they were charged with managing and an outside, non-government force was actually in control.

“It is a chain-of-custody, it is a control issue,” Solomon said.

According to The Gateway Pundit, the only ones with admin control would be Dominion Voting Systems.

The fact that the County does not have system administrators who have administrative access to the Dominion voting machines is a big concern. By allowing Dominion to have the administration access only, the County has basically turned over the system to the Dominion voting machine system people. There is no IT control here because that’s been ceded to Dominion.

By the way, in general, most frauds that include IT-related processes have at least one IT person involved in the fraud. See the video below with OAN and Steve Bannon:

This shows that the election was not run by the County, it was in essence subcontracted to Dominion which is likely not provided for in the law. The election function should be run by County election employees, not some subcontractor.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Miracle! Fox News Covers Election Fraud!


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton joined Maria Bartiromo (pretty much the only person with big enough ovaries left on Fox) on Sunday Morning Futures on Sunday morning. Maria asked the Texas Attorney General about fraudulent activity in the 2020 presidential election. Paxton did not hold back. He also highlights the criminal coverups that occurred in other states where they deliberately comingled all the ballots so you could never do a proper audit of mail-in ballots.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

2006 Pima County, AZ Computer Technician Manipulated Election Data Offline To Get Desired Outcome


Editor's Note: This kind of thing has been going on all over our country ever since electronic voting machines have been put in place.  They need to be ABOLISHED ENTIRELY!!  You cannot have secure elections using electronic voting machines.

 

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com

A reader sent this on the similarities between the Maricopa County elections audit today and the  2006 RTA bond election in Pima county AZ (Tucson).

This $2 Billion proposal was to add a sales tax for roads. It was defeated on the four prior occasions, and polls had it losing for the 5th time. But the bond measure won in a landslide 60/39. The lawsuit brought by the Libertarian Party found that election databases were replaced, and more.

The similarities to the 2020 election fraud are uncanny.

Pima County Elections Director Brad Nelson radically changed procedures for the 2006 RTA bond election. Employees who previously had access to the counting room were no longer allowed in that area. Poll Observers on the night of this 2006 election noticed something odd. Using telephoto lenses they captured images of a staff member using a Microsoft Access manual that was open to the pages on how to alter database files. The GEMS system had a well-know “back door” where data could be changed using MS Access without a password. The poll observers immediately asked Brad Nelson to make a back-up CD of the elections that night, seal it in an envelope and provide it to the police until an investigation could be opened. Nelson refused. Later that night, at 10PM Nelson told observers counting was finished for the evening and sent observers home. The lawsuit discovered counting started up again at 10:13PM that night and continued to tabulate votes without observers until 3AM the next morning. Sound familiar?

Testimony shows that Bryan Crane was the primary Pima election computer technician and was quite familiar with the ability of the GEMS system to export election data and manipulate it off line. He had done so in 1996 election at the instructions of County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry. The audit log of May 11, 2006 had shown that 33 seconds after the election computer was opened that morning, Crane created a second “Day 1 backup” , erased the original and replaced it with this second “Day 1 backup.” Crane operated the GEMS software for ten years before the RTA election and this was not his usual process. Crane personally told key witnesses he “Rigged the RTA election”. As the lawsuit continued, Crane’s story began to change. The AG’s office accepted his fourth story under oath, without comparison to prior explanations. The AG investigators did not question any contradictory witnesses.

Failure to create daily backups of precinct data was a very significant departure from normal practices. It was suggestive that vote total manipulation was occurring off line for the RTA election. The precinct data was not backed up “until 3 days later,” after the results had been published. The missing and errant poll tapes were closely correlated with an abnormally high number of malfunctioning memory cards detected in the electronic files. Consider the odds that the same precincts that had upload errors were the same exact ones missing their poll tapes? The lawsuit revealed that ten months prior to this RTA election, at the request of Crane, Pima County purchased a “crop scanner” tool used for circumventing normal functions of memory cards. This is a read-write computer hacking tool that alters the way a memory card records and reports elections outcome on a precinct level.

After 2 years of legal battles, the plaintiffs litigation team was finally allowed by the courts in 2008 to inspect the poll tapes. But Terry Goddard from the State AG’s office intervened at the last minute and confiscated all paper documents from the election. Godard initially promised to examine the poll tapes, but never did. The AG’s office conducted a “dog and pony show” hand recount. A year later the litigants discovered why. Of the 368 precincts, 112 were missing poll tapes. Another 50 precincts didn’t match their final canvas totals. In totality, this called into question about half of the precincts counted.

Former EAC auditor iBeta originally conducted a joint “investigation” with the suspects (Pima County) and the State AG’s office. It became clear the investigation was steered by the suspects down blind alleys. The iBeta results contained no reference to either swapping or replacing a database. Pima County Board of Supervisors originally assigned county administrator John Moffat to oversee this special RTA election. During the investigation, Moffat had directed the iBeta engineer to look at the Preferences table in the database. The simplest manipulation would have been done in the Candidate tables of the database where you could just reassign votes. Needless to say, the iBeta engineer found no evidence of tampering. The iBeta report contained 5 tests. Two were conducted by Moffat and another where iBeta accepted Moffat’s explanation.

The litigation went on for a total of 8 years and incurred year after year of judicial obstruction, change of venues, judges recused, violation of court orders, etc.  In many instances evidence was not allowed to be heard, lost, or destroyed. The AG’s office never allowed a forensic audit, or independent hand count, even though ballots of different paper thickness were obvious to workers. Time had run out and all the paper ballots were eventually destroyed. No one faced any criminal charges.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Emails Show Democrat Election Officials Colluded with Tech Platforms to Censor Vote Fraud Intel


By Shane Trejo
BigLeaguePolitics.com

Documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from Judicial Watch show that government officials pleaded with tech platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, essentially begging them to censor content throughout last year’s election.

Judicial Watch has obtained 540 pages of documents showing how the California secretary of state’s office demanded for tech giants to censor claims of fraud and irregularities. The tech giants happily complied with the orders in most cases, showing how the private and public sectors are colluding to enforce Big Brother controls against free speech.

Jenna Dresner, who works as senior public information officer for the Office of Election Cybersecurity, admitted to the role of the secretary of state’s office to enforce Big Brother.

“We don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play,” Dresner said. “We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media companies and we let them make that call based on community standards they created.”

Judicial Watch noted that the California secretary of state’s office has targeted their content, falsely claiming it is misinformation and demanding for social media companies to remove their videos.

“These new documents suggest a conspiracy against the First Amendment rights of Americans by the California Secretary of State, the Biden campaign operation, and Big Tech,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. 

“These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’ – as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies,” he added.

While it has been well-known that social media companies are in the tank for the Democrats for quite some time, these email leaks show how Democrat officials work hand-in-glove with monolithic corporations to control the flow of information.

One leaked email shows Chris Miller, listed as communications coordinator for California secretary of state Alex Padilla, demanding that certain information be censored, and Facebook’s affirmative response that they would comply with future requests.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)
Please Support Us With A Purchase








Please Make A One Time Donation
You can send a check
or money order to:
The KTAO Project
P.O. Box 1086
Crestone, CO 81131
or donate online:
Or Better Yet Become A Supporting Member
Worthy of Support
















Help Us Go Viral!

Who's Online
Editor
Guest Users: 668

Stats
7147 Pages Viewed
1287 Unique Visits
What's New
Stories  last 2 weeks
My Account
Please Support Us With A Purchase