• Home
  • Elections/Vote Fraud

Video: Stephen Spoonamore on Stealing Elections Through Electronic Voting Machine Tempering


It's time for all of us to end our wilful denial and acknowledge that our elections are no longer free and fair. They are routinely tampered with, which means we do not have a democracy. It's a joke. It's time to grow up and face the fact that there are people very interested in stealing elections and they are doing it. If we are to establish an election system that actually provides accurate outcomes, we have to take control of it away from the criminals that control it now.

The good news is we can do this by exploiting the voting system to our advantage to vote out all incumbents and demand the new Congress get rid of ALL electronic voting machines.  We can do this by orchestrating landslide elections AGAINST INCUMBENTS.  The tampering that is going on is an average of 3-5% thrown towards whoever they wish to win.  At worst exit polls have show up to 12%.  So worst case scenario, 88% of the votes are being counted accurately.  So if we can get only 20% of voters to deliberately vote against incumbents, vote tampering won't be able to stop the outcome.

This documentary exposes the vulnerability of computers - which count approximately 80% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections - suggesting that if our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  Below is a clip from the film "Hacking Democracy" that shows exactly what happens all the time with electronic voting machines.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Hacking Democracy


This documentary exposes the vulnerability of computers - which count approximately 80% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections - suggesting that if our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  Below is a clip from the film "Hacking Democracy" that shows exactly what happens all the time with electronic voting machines.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Hillary Clinton Did Use the Fake Dossier She Colluded With Russian On To Influence The Outcome of the Election


Editor's Note: Wow. This has been pretty much scrubbed from everywhere. Hillary DID USE THE FAKE DOSSIER SHE PAID FOR to influence the outcome of the election. Luckily one spot archived it. AND REMEMBER, the info in this fake report CAME FROM THE RUSSIANS!! So who colluded with the Russians to influence the outcome of the election?

 

Carter Page: I Told Government That Hillary Hired Steele DURING The Election

 

By Patrick Howley
BigLeaguePolitics.com

Former President Donald Trump campaign adviser Carter Page said that he reported Hillary Clinton’s role in the anti-Trump dossier to governments during the 2016 election, and he believes that Attorney General Jeff Sessions should not be constrained in the Russia case because he got “poor advice” from the DOJ.

Page said he suspected early on that he was the target of a sting operation involving British intelligence. We now know that British spy Christopher Steele compiled a debunked anti-Trump dossier for Fusion GPS, a firm paid millions by the Clinton campaign.

“I didn’t know for sure before the election, but I knew that the Clinton campaign’s opposition political research were behind the fakeness” of the dossier, Page told Big League Politics in an exclusive interview.

In October 2016, while the election was still going on, Page sent a letter to the inter-governmental Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) — provided to Big League Politics — where he stated: “I have learned from a reliable source that a law firm close to the Clinton campaign has hired a London-based private investigator to investigate my trip to Russia. This approach is closely consistent with past tactics that investigators affiliated with Mrs. Clinton have historically taken toward their targeted victims: ‘Impugn…character and veracity until…destroyed beyond all recognition.'”

The United States government is represented in the OSCE.

As Big League Politics reported, the Hillary Clinton campaign promoted the Christopher Steele dossier DURING the presidential election, using the intermediary of Yahoo reporter Michael Isikoff. The Clinton campaign’s press release on the matter has almost completely disappeared from the Internet, but we found its preserved contents — proving that Clinton used the Steele dossier to influence the election.

Page thinks Sessions can still be involved with the Russia case if he figures out how to dis-recuse himself.

“It’s a little bit more difficult to do an un–recusal there at Justice, but any unbiased and logical review of potential conflicts makes it clear that there’s no reason that he should be constrained,” Page told Big League Politics in an exclusive interview.

“I think he is a good man, and it’s a shame that he was given poor advice by people at DOJ. Showing a similar history, bear in mind how Chairman Nunes was falsely accused of having conflicts of interest. But he patiently fought back and has been able to do great things,” Page told BLP.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Research: Google Search Manipulation Can Swing Nearly 80 Percent of Undecided Voters


 

By Allum Bokhari
Breitbart.com

By inserting negative search suggestions under the name of a candidate, search engines like Google can shift the opinions of undecided voters by up to 43.4 percent, according to new research by a team at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and reported exclusively by Breitbart News.

The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.

His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion.

From the study:

The voting preferences of participants who saw no search suggestions shifted toward the favored candidate by 37.1%. The voting preferences of participants in the search suggestion groups who saw only positive search suggestions shifted similarly (35.6%). However, the voting preferences of participants who saw three positive search suggestions and one negative search suggestion barely shifted (1.8%); this occurred because the negative search suggestion attracted more than 40% of the clicks (negativity bias). In other words, a single negative search suggestion can impact opinions dramatically. Participants who were shown four negative suggestions (and no positives) shifted away from the candidate shown in the search bar (-43.4%).

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

FREE Video Library: Elections/Vote Tampering/Fraud


  • Hacking Democracy
    This HBO documentary exposes the vulnerability of the voting machines counting roughly 80% of the votes cast in our county, state and federal elections - and exposes the fraud, corruption of the Diebold company that produces them.  If our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either.  These machines are clearly not designed to produce secure, accurate elections.  They are clearly designed to rig them.
  • Stephen Spoonamore on Stealing Elections Through Electronic Voting Machine Tampering
    This is an incredible interview with an expert on electronic machine transactions, namely ATM, secure transactions and what's required to chain of custody and totally secure records.  You will be socked to learn what is opinion is of the equipment we use for our elections.

     

Short Videos

Funny Videos

 

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Gerrymandering: 'Voters Should Pick Their Politicians -- NOT the Other Way Around'


Gerrymandering is a practice intended to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries. The resulting district is known as a gerrymander, however that word is also a verb for the process.  The term gerrymandering has negative connotations. Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).

In addition to its use achieving desired electoral results for a particular party, gerrymandering may be used to help or hinder a particular demographic, such as a political, ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, or class group, such as in U.S. federal voting district boundaries that produce a majority of constituents representative of African-American or other racial minorities, known as "majority-minority districts". Gerrymandering can also be used to protect incumbents.

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Dershowitz: Census Citizenship Question Issue Will End Up At Supreme Court


Editor's Note:  Only counting US citizens is essential when calculating how many Congressional House seats any given state is allowed. If millions of illegals have been counted in the past, it's possible that some states, like California, may have more Congressional seats than they are properly permitted.

~~~~~~~~

DALLAS (CBSDFW.COM/AP)
– The Trump administration’s decision to ask people about their citizenship in the 2020 census will end up at the Supreme Court according to Civil Liberties attorney Alan Dershowitz. The question is – when?

“Whether it will end up [at the Supreme Court] in time for the next Census is a hard question because the law moves slowly,” Dershowitz told CBS 11 Political Reporter Jack Fink.

 

 

Dershowitz stressed that the Census is required by the constitution. “We get to determine who gets Congressional seats based on the Census,” he said. The Census is used to determine the number of congressional districts in each state as well as federal funding for schools, roads, and other projects.

Several states that have slowing population growth or high numbers of immigrants such as California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts and Ohio are typically at risk of losing U.S. House seats when their congressional districts are redrawn every 10 years — depending on how fully their residents are counted.

Dershowitz also said that – whether a citizenship question should be on the Census – is hard to answer. “The answers to the specific question… are very complex and very difficult and we haven’t really begun to sort them out,” he said. “And I think these are the kinds of questions that we have to begin to ask. And they’ll be asked – not only in the halls of Congress – but in the courts,” he continued. “Because there will be challenges to that question. Because if that question results in Green Card holders not submitting themselves to the Census – Green Card holders are American persons under the law – [they] have to be counted,” Dershowitz continued. “Obviously illegal aliens have a different status.”

“These are very important questions but they are constitutional in nature because the Census determines the House of Representatives and other important aspects of Americas legal and Constitutional life,” Dershowitz added.

At least one lawsuit has already been filed.

California struck quickly, with Attorney General Xavier Becerra filing a federal lawsuit Tuesday that seeks to block Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’ decision to add a citizenship question in 2020.

Officials from New York and New Jersey, also Democratic-led states, were also planning on leading or participating in lawsuits. Massachusetts signaled interest, too.

Dershowitz spoke in Irving this week before the Institute of Policy Innovation, a free-market think tank.

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Video: Mark Levin Interviews Devin Nunes (R-CA), House Intelligence Committee Chair


Mark Levin interviewed House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes on the overall FISA Court abuse and political investigation by the DOJ and FBI.  In a comprehensive interview Levin walks through a timeline of media reporting.

 

 

 

 
 
 
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Election Interference Concerns Prompt Returns To Paper Ballots


Editor's Note:  Word on the street is that the next big shoe to drop will be a report by DHS that will expose the real threat to voting integrity, the Democratic party.  So, once again it seems we will find that the Left has done what they have accused Russia of hoping to cover their own rotten tracks.   Their trumped up hysteria over Russian interference is coming back to bite them in the ass.  The last thing the left wants is to get rid of electronic voting machines because they make it a lot easier to tamper with election results.  So their hysterical efforts to get rid of Trump with the Russia, Russia, Russia tampered with our election thing is now resulting in what is surely an unintended consequence of people realizing we need to go back to paper ballots.  All electronic machines should be banned!!

~~~~~~~

 

WASHINGTON — Hoping to counter waves of Russian Twitter bots, fake social media accounts, and hacking attacks aimed at undermining American democracy, state election officials around the country are seizing on an old-school strategy: paper ballots.

In Virginia, election officials have gone back to a paper ballot system, as a way to prevent any foreign interference. Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolfe this month ordered county officials to ensure new election equipment produces a paper record. Georgia lawmakers are considering legislation to replace a touch-screen voting system with paper.

Top election officials around the country are growing increasingly alarmed about this fall’s midterm elections, with a drumbeat of dire warning signs that Russia is determined to influence them. And many are concerned that President Trump has not focused on the potential for more attacks on America’s election system like the one Russia launched in 2016.

With little leadership from the White House or Congress, they are acting locally, trying to outwit potential hackers by upgrading equipment and enhancing the cybersecurity of systems that contain sensitive voter registration rolls. Secretaries of state and other elections officials around the country in recent months also began applying for security clearances so that federal officials can start briefing them on classified information — and potential threats to election integrity.

Continue Reading

  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)